'
My innocent remarks about H.P. Lovecraft piqued the interest of a number of Ranters, so I thought I would start a thread to go more deeply into the matter.
I have often wondered why the USA has produced almost nothing but second- and third-raters in the arts --- particularly in literature.
I suspect it is because there is such a strong aversion to telling the truth in American "culture" --- it has a very stultifying effect on thought and art.
Numan, I can put up with (even though I disagree) with much of your anti-American ideas, but about the arts? Man, you just don't know your arts if you think that.
Sigh. I am amused (faintly) that so many Americans mistake truth-telling and even the gentlest satire as anti-Americanism. Tetchiness is an extremely American tendency, the vanity of Americans is usually seen by themselves as pride (quite a different thing), and so many, many Americans have absolutely no sense of humor!
Jazz and the Blues.
nuff said
I agree with you that jazz is a contribution to world culture, and, given twenty-five hundred years of undisturbed evolution, might reach the level of sophistication which classical Indian ragas already have attained.
But jazz is the product of an oppressed minority of the US population; the dominant culture had no hand in its creation --- other than to make so many millions of their fellow Americans so miserable that they could only find an outlet for their feelings in musical creation.
The musical tradition of the dominant majority has been vacuous and limited in the extreme. The only composers of real quality I can think of at the moment are Aaron Copland and Alan Hovaniss --- and the latter was at least as influenced by his Armenian heritage as his American.
I think that Sacred Harp singing may be juxtaposed in an interesting fashion against jazz. Both are products of the southern American tradition. I first heard it as a teenager on very low fidelity ethnographic recordings from the early 1940's. I knew nothing about what I was hearing, and someone asked me where I thought the music came from. I thought perhaps from deepest, darkest Africa! As I became used to the recordings, I was vividly carried back to 19th century America, to the peasant culture of the "poor white trash," to their rootedness in the earth, to an uneducated, uncultured people in whom burned an intense flame of simple-minded faith in a primitive religion which sustained them in their life of hardship.
Alas, in my short lifetime that has all vanished away! Modern Sacred Harp singing, though more popular and widespread than in the 40's, has lost its soul and is as shallow and heartless as most other aspects of modern American "mass culture"
[an oxymoron if ever there was one!].
numan,
your anti-americanism is yours to stroke and love all you want, but your disdain for all things american as it is represented here has hindered your ability to see the forest for the trees, as it goes. our irish brother has handed you two fine examples, two that have been embraced lovingly by the world, yet you can even find a reason to denigrate that. there are a number of american masters where the arts are concerned, but it is apparent that you would argue to the death against such a fact. frankly, i do not see opportunity for discussion here, based upon your past inability to see america as anything other than an obstacle to the rest of the world.
'
Your criticism is incorrect. In fact, I praised jazz. It seems that, in your eyes, my sin lies in the fact that I did not over-praise it. All too many Americans feel outrage unless their country is over-praised.
By the way, objectively, the USA is an obstacle to the rest of the world. The most recent, obvious example of that fact is the present economic calamity.
.
'
shallow and heartless as most other aspects modern American "mass culture" [an oxymoron if ever there was one!].
Just out of curiosity, which modern mass culture do you present as an admirable alternative?
'
Is it not interesting that in the land of the vulgar "Pursuit of Happiness," so many of the best writers are gloomy and morbid? One thinks of Nathaniel Hawthorne, Edgar Allan Poe, Herman Melville, Mark Twain, and a host of later luminaries (or at least what passes for illumination in the USA).
Edgar Allan Poe is interesting; he was influential in the 19th century (almost the only influential American writer in the 19th century), particularly in France --- analogous to the unfortunate case of Jerry Lewis in our own time. He was at least a good third-rate poet, but his works are sadly dated --- and one of the crucial tests of great works of art is that they do not become dated. He did produce one great poem --- the ever-glorious To Helen.
Mark Twain rarely rose above being a second-rate writer, but his Huckleberry Finn rose to the heights of greatness --- at least before the descent into bathos and vulgarity at the end of the novel. It certainly deserves to be considered the "Great American Novel." I have always considered it comparable to Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness; it captures, as no other book does, the essential horror and nullity at the heart of the American experience. No wonder it was one of the few American books Stalin permitted to be published in the Soviet Union during the Cold War! How amazing that so many people consider it to be a children's book!
The only other possible contender for the title of the "Great American Novel" is Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita. It is an extended, sophisticated metaphor about Europe's rape of America and America's corruption of Europe.
'
By the way, objectively, the USA is an obstacle to the rest of the world. The most recent, obvious example of that fact is the present economic calamity.
.
Objectively? Perhaps any opinion you have is self defined as objective? Is it your (objective) assertion that economic crisis started with the creation of the USA and would never recur if the USA was to disappear? which nation do you propose as standard bearer whose leaders never make mistakes. Which country in history has achieved great power and not abused that power? Which nation has achieved a political system devoid of corruption by the wealthy? Which nation is populated by people that are not human, but near god like in their disdain for seeking personal benefit? Where is the Valhalla that we should all reference with adoration? Perhaps you would agree to be philosopher king of the world and save us all from ourselves?
'
Your criticism is incorrect. In fact, I praised jazz. It seems that, in your eyes, my sin lies in the fact that I did not over-praise it. All too many Americans feel outrage unless their country is over-praised.
By the way, objectively, the USA is an obstacle to the rest of the world. The most recent, obvious example of that fact is the present economic calamity.
.
im not interested in over praise. i said you can even find a way to denigrate it and my point is bolstered by this comment, written by you:
But jazz is the product of an oppressed minority of the US population; the dominant culture had no hand in its creation --- other than to make so many millions of their fellow Americans so miserable that they could only find an outlet for their feelings in musical creation.
Let's not forget these quintessential American inventions:
Roller Derby, Demolition Derby, and Costumed Wrestling
And what other country on Earth has a near-universally available media channel dedicated solely to presenting fake news stories to keep the mentally-challenged occupied?
Well, the cinema is a largely American creation, yes I know there are others, but I rest my case. Now just off the top of my head:
Leonard Bernstein
Cole Porter
John Williams
Stephen Sondheim
Esa pekka Salonen (while foreign born, most of his works were created while in residence in America)
John Singleton Copley
Albert Bierstadt
Frank Lloyd Wright
Frank Gehry
That is a start, go for it Numan.
Aaron Copeland, Andrew Weyth, e.e. cummings, O Henry, Frank Lloyd Wright.
Numan~Here I must challenge you. Culture or what anyone considers culture is subjective and a matter of taste. And there are some things that can transcend many tastes and be known for both very bad and supreme examples of said culture. You seem to be well-read, well-informed and well-experienced. You know what you like, what you think is sensible and can articulate very well that which is your opinion. I respect that and have agreed with you on several points. But I think.IMHO, that you do have a very anti-American view that colors any feeling towards and actually inhibits objectivity to anything produced or practiced by this country. i.e, when you damned Jazz with faint praise.
Americans have shown several instances of bad taste, bad music, bad art, bad dance, bad sense and bad actions. But that is not the strict purvue of Americans. That is a human condition and world-wide.
As I said on the RT, where this was first introduced by you. What one considers great or terrible is a matter of personal taste. I like American Blue, you prefer Canadian Red. One is better to me, the other to you. Neither wrong, just different.
I do have to admit, that I have liked most of your choices. You have shown a truly sophisticated palate and caused me to look over some of my own choices to enjoy all over again. I give you thanks for that.
I'm fond of John Henry Twachtman's work. He was an American.
John Wayne in "The Searchers".:-)
Yours in an artsy-fartsy mood,
Issodhos
Iss, you and I agree. The Searchers is one of my favorites and one of the best movies ever made. In fact, I like anything directed by John Ford, including The Grapes of Wrath with Henry Fonda, which I saw a few weeks ago.
I will also add, in the painting category, N.C. Wyeth. Pure American.
EmmaG
since you bring up the grapes of wrath, let us not forget steinbeck.
Absolutely, 2wins. I mentioned him the other day in the other thread.
Gee.... where'd numan go??
'
It may surprise you to know, Skyhawk, that I have a life, out side of this site. However, I am back!
.
Perhaps you would agree to be philosopher king of the world and save us all from ourselves?
I would attempt to save only those who could be saved. Triage, you know.
Is it your (objective) assertion that economic crisis started with the creation of the USA and would never recur if the USA was to disappear? which nation do you propose as standard bearer whose leaders never make mistakes. Which country in history has achieved great power and not abused that power? Which nation has achieved a political system devoid of corruption by the wealthy? Which nation is populated by people that are not human, but near god-like in their disdain for seeking personal benefit? Where is the Valhalla that we should all reference with adoration?
Thank you, Ardy, for pointing out the shortcomings of American society even more forcefully than I have --- even though it has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.
.
im not interested in over praise. i said you can even find a way to denigrate it [jazz] and my point is bolstered by this comment, written by you:
But jazz is the product of an oppressed minority of the US population; the dominant culture had no hand in its creation --- other than to make so many millions of their fellow Americans so miserable that they could only find an outlet for their feelings in musical creation.
I fear that your emotions of righteous indignation are causing you to say something which you do not mean.
I might be accused (even though unjustly) of denigrating the dominant culture of the USA, but there is not the slightest degree of criticism of jazz in the statement which you quoted.
.
It may surprise you to know, Skyhawk, that I have a life, out side of this site. However, I am back!
Must have been sleeping, eh?
'
Excellent! That was almost droll, Skyhawk!
You seem to have some embers of humor in your nature; I hope that you will fan them into a brighter fire!
.
'
Excellent! That was almost droll, Skyhawk!
You seem to have some embers of humor in your nature; I hope that you will fan them into a brighter fire!
.
being patronising really persuades people doesnt it?
'
Excellent! That was almost droll, Skyhawk!
You seem to have some embers of humor in your nature; I hope that you will fan them into a brighter fire!
.
being patronising really persuades people doesnt it?
Numan~Here I must challenge you. Culture or what anyone considers culture is subjective and a matter of taste. And there are some things that can transcend many tastes and be known for both very bad and supreme examples of said culture.
I think that we agree much more than we disagree.
I think it is wise to make a distinction between
taste, which is subjective, and
aesthetic judgment, which has a core that is objective, and does not change.
I agree with Shakespeare, when he has Hamlet say,
"Now this overdone, or come tardy off, though it make the unskillful laugh, cannot but make the judicious grieve, the censure of which, one must in your allowance o'erweigh a whole theatre of others."The objective core of art is notoriously difficult to define, but in a finger-pointing way of defining it, I think it comes down to the traditional
cliché of the Good, the True, the Harmonious. As Plato said in the
Philebus,
"If we are not able to capture the Good in a single idea, we shall do so with three: Beauty, Harmony, and Truth."The highest works of art are those which best permit goodness, truth and harmony to shine through them; that is why Bach and Mozart are greater than
any rock-and-roll or heavy metal music.
It may be objected that even in heavy metal music, American militarism and Nazi ritual there are aesthetic components which have a certain "beauty" of their own. This is true, but to become Platonic, these are very dim, fading shadows of the true Beauty which shines forth in the great works of Art. In general, whatever aesthetic components such trash possesses are merely formal, superficial craftsmanship and illuminate true Beauty very ill. Bach, on the other hand, raises us to a transcendent realm where we glimpse what the angels sing to God.
Germany produced Bach, and many, many other towering figures in the arts. Europe is resplendent with Great Art.
The United States produced Elvis.
American barbarism, if it had any sense, would bend the knee and worship at the shrine of European Greatness.
.
being patronising really persuades people doesnt it?
And flattering their vanity rarely causes them to think.
.
And flattering their vanity rarely causes them to think.
We'll remember not to do that to you, numan.
Trying to avoid those that have been mentioned and granting that even the best can produce clunkers, I offer for consideration:
Arthur Miller
Eugene O'Neill
Stephen Crane
H.L. Mencken
Lillian Hellman
Cecil B. deMille
W. D. Griffith
Frank Baum
Robert Frost
Gwendolyn Brooks
Frank Norris
Clifford Odets
William Faulkner
Gene Kelly
Langston Hughes
Louisa May Alcott
Jack Wolf
Washington Irving
Harper Lee
Ernie Kovacs
Robin Williams
Charles Schultz
Al Capp
Jim Henson
Walt Disney
for starters
im not interested in over praise. i said you can even find a way to denigrate it [jazz] and my point is bolstered by this comment, written by you:
But jazz is the product of an oppressed minority of the US population; the dominant culture had no hand in its creation --- other than to make so many millions of their fellow Americans so miserable that they could only find an outlet for their feelings in musical creation.
I fear that your emotions of righteous indignation are causing you to say something which you do not mean.
I might be accused (even though unjustly) of denigrating the dominant culture of the USA, but there is not the slightest degree of criticism of jazz in the statement which you quoted.
.
first, do not pretend to tell me what i mean. you may well possess a great deal of rote knowledge and you might even have a bit of that old high brow palate, but your intelligence is centered in your ego and your arrogance knows no bounds. yes, yes, we are called upon here to avoid such remarks but it is impossible to sit back and watch this go on without saying it outright. too bad for you, numan - interesting nomenclature by the way - because you are missing out on so much of the beauty that is life from the perch where you have placed yourself. i hope one day you will come down off that self-imposed perch and join the rest of us low brows by enjoying the dirt and grime and toil that is the human race. it's actually one of the finest places i have ever been and i have been just about every place a person could possibly go. good luck to you on your journey, i hope you find what you're looking for.
And flattering their vanity rarely causes them to think.
We'll remember not to do that to you, numan.
I cannot remember any instance of you sinking to that level of vulgarity.
.
first, do not pretend to tell me what i mean. you may well possess a great deal of rote knowledge and you might even have a bit of that old high brow palate, but your intelligence is centered in your ego and your arrogance knows no bounds.
Mirror, mirror on the wall....
.
'
Neither man nor woman can be worth anything until they have discovered
that they are fools. This is the first step toward becoming either estimable
or agreeable; and until it is taken there is no hope.
--- Lord Melbourne
.
Anyone who breaks into "nanny nanny boo boo" gets a time out.
Julia, the Ranter
I will also add, in the painting category, N.C. Wyeth. Pure American.
EmmaG
Andrew Wyeth was not bad, either.
Yours,
Issodhos
My innocent remarks about H.P. Lovecraft piqued the interest of a number of Ranters, so I thought I would start a thread to go more deeply into the matter....
I missed you remarks about Lovecraft, but are you familiar with the works of another American writer very strongly influenced by him - Robert E. Howard?
I have often wondered why the USA has produced almost nothing but second- and third-raters in the arts --- particularly in literature.
Is it necessarily a reasonable comparison to make between the artistic accomplishments of a culture that is barely four centuries old and its European parentage that has 2.5 millennia of development? Or to the East Asian cultures that you so obviously admire and their four millennia of artistic treasure?
Is it necessarily a reasonable comparison to make between the artistic accomplishments of a culture that is barely four centuries old and its European parentage that has 2.5 millennia of development? Or to the East Asian cultures that you so obviously admire and their four millennia of artistic treasure?
The point you make is worthy of consideration, but it merely shrinks the arena of comparisons to a span of four centuries. During that four centuries, Europe has vastly outshone America in art and letters.
Moreover, America has not sprung from the forehead of Zeus; in the main, it is a side-branch of European culture. That makes the degeneration into barbarism of its culture all the more appalling,
'
The essential failure of America is that it has no High Culture.
Let me emphasize that I am not referring to the culture of a snobbish clique. I allude to what I mentioned in a previous posting here. The goal of High Culture is the elevation of the spirit; it is centered around the pursuit of the Good, the True and the Beautiful. It drives consciousness into realms which could never have been conceived without the transcendent fire of artistic creation.
To paraphrase Aristotle:
True Art is the energy of the soul at its highest peak, as it pursues the goal of existence.
It is a measure of the utter degradation of American consciousness that these statements sound ridiculous or incomprehensible to most Americans.
American life is dominated by pop culture and mass entertainment. Profit is its driving force, not the expansion of consciousness. Its "art" is ephemeral, shallow, the "suppliance of a moment" --- which is inevitable, since most Americans no longer have the ability to concentrate their minds for any length of time.
It is this almost total lack of a High Culture, and the triumph of garbage in the marketplace, that renders plausible the false view that art is a matter of taste, rather than the traditional view that there is an inner core to art which is real and unchanging.
Numan -
I have, I am sorry to say, serious questions about your taste.
Over time you have suggested that Americans have no real culture, that our population is ignorant, uneducated, and devoid of curiosity. You feel that our government is deeply disordered, corrupt, self-serving, and fatally flawed.
Given that most of the members of this board are Americans, your views and your values must make spending time at RR a bit like a visit with the tattooed denizens of a trailer park.
You are, of course, welcome here; you always have been. But there must be boards like this where the membership is primarily Canadian, European, anything but American; I find myself shaking my head that you continue to spend your time with us.
I can only assume that other sites have not been as welcoming - or perhaps you prefer feeling like the fast fish in a slow pond.
Still, I feel it wise to remind you that there are many boards in the webisphere where you could express your opinion without running the risk of insulting the other posters, where your erudition could be appreciated by members who were raised and educated to value it properly, and where those members can engage with you on a more equitable level.
Until you find a board like that you will, of course, continue to be welcome here.
Julia
Poster
Thank you, Julia. You say things so nicely.
Indeed, Julia. Thank you.
Numan, to put it bluntly, you are either woefully uninformed or just plain wrong. America is widely recognized as the heart of modern "high" culture and your statements to the contrary exhibit either animus or ignorance.
I believe the one truly distinctive feature of American Arts and Letters is not really geographic, but rather temporal. We have simply moved beyond the times that a single individual can be a true polymath. During most of the centuries of European Culture, an intelligent person with adequate resources could (and usually did) master almost all of the science and literature available in their time. That is impossible now.
The result is that we see very few scientists, engineers, or doctors writing great literature (or even studying it much). We see very few great writers who have studied any technical field. Most "technical writers" are just people who didn't get very far in a technical field or writers who study a bit of science and technology to get to the "hobbyist level". And we see an awful lot of humanities majors who can't program their own digital watches.
Just because there is a self-referencing circle of "intellectuals" who see themselves as the epitome of civilization, doesn't mean they really understand much outside their self-inflated little puddle of "fine literature", "fine art", and "fine music". The highly-intelligent in America (and pretty much everywhere else, too, these days) go into engineering, or medicine, or the "hard" sciences.
I would occasionally purchase the works of other sages, who enjoyed great riches and the sweets of success, to learn what sort of things they wrote about. Well, they wrote about the difference between the front and the rear, about the wondrous structure of the Tyrant's throne, its sweeping arms and all-enduring legs, and tracts about good manners, and detailed descriptions of this and that, during which no one ever praised himself in any way, and yet it worked out somehow that Phrensius stood in awe of Schneckon, and Schneckon of Phrensius, while both were lauded by the Logarites. And then there were the Voltaic brothers catapulted to fame: Vaulter elevated Vauntor, Vauntor elevated Vanitole, and Vanitole did likewise for Vaultor.
Stanislaw Lem, from The Cyberiad
Over time you have suggested that Americans have no real culture, that our population is ignorant, uneducated, and devoid of curiosity. You feel that our government is deeply disordered, corrupt, self-serving, and fatally flawed.
I think that is a fair assessment of my views.
The great problem is that Americans, by and large, think that they have a superior society, and in fact, in so many ways, it is a very inferior society. Americans refuse to recognize this, and this "false consciousness," this disconnect between reality and belief, is at the heart of much of the evil that infects modern America. This is what makes Americans such easy prey to all the lies they are told, and which they tell themselves. Until they have the courage to face the truth, there is no hope for them.
Like Socrates, I am a gadfly, asking questions and pointing out truths which most Americans find very "inconvenient." If we were living in ancient Athens, I am sure there are some people who, having read my innocuous remarks, would already have forced me to drink hemlock.
This reaction of rage and dislike are, I think, an indication that what I am saying is true. If Americans are such a self-confident, liberty-loving people, why would they resent my remarks so much? Cultivated Europeans, by and large, would not react in such a manner. Civilized people have been trained to be able to listen to anything without losing their their tempers or their self-confidence.
As to why I do what I do: I am an American who actually wants a better America --- as opposed to all those who merely profess, amid the rockets red glare and flags waving in air, to love their country. I hope, perhaps vainly, that some people will wake up to the true condition of their society before it is too late. As someone far more awake than I reputedly said, "There are some whose eyes are only lightly covered with dust; it is for them that I will speak the truth."
After reading what you wrote Numan, I strongly urge the purchase of a mirror.
This reaction of rage and dislike are, I think, an indication that what I am saying is true. If Americans are such a self-confident, liberty-loving people, why would they resent my remarks so much? Cultivated Europeans, by and large, would not react in such a manner. Civilized people have been trained to be able to listen to anything without losing their their tempers or their self-confidence.
numan, you amuse me more than anything.
As to why I do what I do: I am an American who actually wants a better America.
So, presumably, after receiving a formal education in America and being employed by American organizations that gave you a pension, you ran away to Canada in order to bring about a better America.
Ya know, numan... I think you have succeeded. America IS better for your choice.
why would they resent my remarks so much?
Numan, I believe you are confusing "resentment" with "ennui."
There is no hemlock here.
numan i read and re-read your most recent post and i am constantly reminded of germany, france, spain and italy during the first half of the 20th century. you could easily be describing what took place during the rise of european fascism. so that leads me to ask, precisely what group of europeans are you speaking for in this last post?
The great problem is that Americans, by and large, think that they have a superior society,
I hardlyt think Americans are unique in this. As far as I can tell, nearly every nation ion the world thinks they are "special".... if you talk to the greeks, they think they are special above all aother, as do the japanese, as do the chinese, as do the french, as do the germans. The mexicans think that they are the best, and every other latin american nation is sure they are wrong. Blacks despise the koreans, and vice versa.
In any case, while it is true that many americans are proud of the nation's accomplishments... only a small minority would choose lasting artistic achievement as the best measure of that greatness.
Further it is rather absurd to compare Elvis with Bach... and judeg a society based upon that comparison. And then call that an objective measure. We might as well comparte ABBA to Copeland and judge the Europeans based upon that "objective" measure.
I am not convinced that mass culture in any nation is particularly admirable. I have done some traveling in India... and as far as I can tell, the mass culture there is significantly below the classical raga standard that you mention. I would say that most Bollywood movies adehere to an even lower standard than their hollywood compatriots.
I also have traveled in Europe... and have had several restaurant meals ruined by blasting euro pop music. Not to mention people smoking beside me.
Like Socrates, I am a gadfly, asking questions and pointing out truths which most Americans find very "inconvenient."
And your quest to enlighten americans is furthered by comparing elvis to bach?
If we were living in ancient Athens, I am sure there are some people who, having read my innocuous remarks, would already have forced me to drink hemlock.
This reaction of rage and dislike are, I think, an indication that what I am saying is true.
It is not difficult to go to a foreign nation and make remarks that generate rage and dislike. It is even possible that those comments might be true.... although rage generation is no measure of truth. YOu could go to Israel and deny the holocaust... it would generate rage without any connection to truth.
But, lets suppose that we go to some nation and make truthful comments that generate rage.... I would never the less wonder if such and excercise would be inherently instructive for that nation. Perhaps the only point of the excercise would be our own self gratification
As someone far more awake than I reputedly said, "There are some whose eyes are only lightly covered with dust; it is for them that I will speak the truth."
Thanks for pointing out that Elvis is not Bach.... that was very enlightening.
So, presumably, after receiving a formal education in America and being employed by American organizations that gave you a pension, you ran away to Canada in order to bring about a better America.
I wish my fellow man (and woman) well, but I am not suicidal. I see little point in standing shoulder-to-shoulder in solidarity with those who are determined to destroy themselves.
"It is not reasonable that a wise man should hazard himself for his country,
and endanger wisdom for a set of fools." --- Theodorus of Cyrene
Moreover, I have, much more than most Americans, opposed corrupt power, and put my life and happiness into jeopardy. Now, in my sunset years, I think it is the responsibility of younger people to pick up the torch. I have only words left to contribute.
I understand your remarks, and where they are coming from, but they are unjust. A wise man suspends judgment until he has all the facts.
Numan, I believe you are confusing "resentment" with "ennui."
There may be ennui, but there is also resentment --- and active hatred.
There is no hemlock here.
Tell that to Martin Luther King.
.
There may be ennui, but there is also resentment --- and active hatred.
Or could it be that some of us are just having ... fun?
There may be ennui, but there is also resentment --- and active hatred.
Or could it be that some of us are just having ... fun?
Unlikely since numan has already made an objective detiminatiuon that americans are lacking in humor
So, presumably, after receiving a formal education in America and being employed by American organizations that gave you a pension, you ran away to Canada in order to bring about a better America.
I wish my fellow man (and woman) well, but I am not suicidal. I see little point in standing shoulder-to-shoulder in solidarity with those who are determined to destroy themselves.
"It is not reasonable that a wise man should hazard himself for his country,
and endanger wisdom for a set of fools." --- Theodorus of Cyrene
Moreover, I have, much more than most Americans, opposed corrupt power, and put my life and happiness into jeopardy. Now, in my sunset years, I think it is the responsibility of younger people to pick up the torch. I have only words left to contribute.
I understand your remarks, and where they are coming from, but they are unjust. A wise man suspends judgment until he has all the facts.
Numan, I believe you are confusing "resentment" with "ennui."
There may be ennui, but there is also resentment --- and active hatred.
There is no hemlock here.
Tell that to Martin Luther King.
.
Thank you for your sympathy --- and lack of resentment.
.
After reading what you wrote Numan, I strongly urge the purchase of a mirror.
Why would I need a mirror, when I have you?
.
Thank you for your sympathy --- and lack of resentment.
.
well, at least you get that i have no resentment. but pity would be more like it numan. and numan, pause for a moment and think about this board. do you really think you are not on a board with people of the world? most of us, as i have come to know many over the years, have much experience in the world outside the u.s. and most of us are not the type to bleed red white and blue. however, we do possess the ability to see beauty beyond the scars and the grime that is accumulated by any culture. for better or worse, i have never looked upon us as an exclusive entity in the world. rather we are a part of a whole. and whole of course is the human race. and for all of humanity's foibles, downfalls and shortcomings, we are capable of great beauty, compassion and despite the obvious trend toward destruction, there are still many both in this nation and throughout the world who work toward overcoming those shortcomings both in ourselves and the human race. if you cannot see that, the violin that plays is an expression of my pity, not sympathy. and yes, i did get the sarcasm in your post. your sarcasm is difficult to miss.
Moreover, I have, much more than most Americans, opposed corrupt power, and put my life and happiness into jeopardy. Now, in my sunset years, I think it is the responsibility of younger people to pick up the torch. I have only words left to contribute.
Then perhaps what we see amply demonstrated in your words here is the bitterness of your own experience rather than true objectivity.
A wise man suspends judgment until he has all the facts.
Indeed.
As to why I do what I do: I am an American who actually wants a better America --- as opposed to all those who merely profess, amid the rockets red glare and flags waving in air, to love their country. I hope, perhaps vainly, that some people will wake up to the true condition of their society before it is too late
Bold is mine.
Why???
And how will spending time on RR...with its preponderant population of senior citizens...be productive in effecting that end? Methinks posting on a predominantly youthful board would be far more profitable. Old dogs
can learn new tricks, but may not
want to.
Personally, I find beauty in what I find beauty in; it may not be what amazes or delights
you, but why should that be my...or anyone else's...concern?
Arthur Miller
Eugene O'Neill
Stephen Crane
H.L. Mencken
Lillian Hellman
Cecil B. deMille
W. D. Griffith
Frank Baum
Robert Frost
Gwendolyn Brooks
Frank Norris
Clifford Odets
William Faulkner
Gene Kelly
Langston Hughes
Louisa May Alcott
Jack Wolf
Washington Irving
Harper Lee
Ernie Kovacs
Robin Williams
Charles Schultz
Al Capp
Jim Henson
Walt Disney
Awesome list, Martha!!
most of us, as i have come to know many over the years, have much experience in the world outside the u.s. and most of us are not the type to bleed red white and blue. however, we do possess the ability to see beauty beyond the scars and the grime that is accumulated by any culture. for better or worse, i have never looked upon us as an exclusive entity in the world. rather we are a part of a whole. and whole of course is the human race. and for all of humanity's foibles, downfalls and shortcomings, we are capable of great beauty, compassion and despite the obvious trend toward destruction, there are still many both in this nation and throughout the world who work toward overcoming those shortcomings both in ourselves and the human race.
2wins, everything you have written could have been said about many decent Germans during the Nazi regime, but that does not change the fact that the Nazi state and society were evil.
.
'
Getting back to the topic of the thread, I would never say that there is no aesthetic virtue at all in the inferior productions of American mass culture, but these worthy elements are swamped by the vastly greater amount of evil that is propagated by this "culture."
Plato had justification for wishing that inferior art be banished from his ideal Republic --- which was, of course, a metaphor for banishing it from the life and consciousness of the individual person.
Even if we do not go so far, it is wise to treat any art which is not worthy to be considered High Culture as a dangerous drug, which may serve some positive ends, but which should always be used with a keen consciousness of the evils which it may introduce into the purity of the soul.
.
I have been re-reading, and thinking, and perhaps Numan has a point.
I see most of us spending our time on this site being critical of the world in general and the US in particular, and suggesting ways in which we think it could be improved.
But there is obviously a poster or two out there who has flown under my radar, and as a mod, that concerns me.
So before this conversations goes much further, I'd like to hear from that poster or posters - you know, the ones running around waving American flags, who believe the war against Iraq was in retaliation for an injury done to us by that country.
I want to hear from the poster who believes all our government officials are fairly elected and pure as the driven snow.
I want to know which of us think that what the starving people of the world need is another McDonald's.
I want to hear from the fool who says "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" and "American Idol" are great gifts America gave to the world, and inform him or her that both those shows originated in Great Britain.
Who is it that is driving Numan to educate us all? Step up!
numan has offered a wholesale condemnation of the human race both here and on other threads. he is baiting and clearly enjoying the ride.
numan has offered a wholesale condemnation of the human race both here and on other threads. he is baiting and clearly enjoying the ride.
Yep, he certainly is a Master baiter.
(Think I'll blame that one on Naomi.
)
'
Even if we do not go so far, it is wise to treat any art which is not worthy to be considered High Culture as a dangerous drug, which may serve some positive ends, but which should always be used with a keen consciousness of the evils which it may introduce into the purity of the soul.
The "purity of the soul"??? Well, damn, my soul must be fetid, putrid mess...because when all is said and done, just gimme some of that ol' time rock & roll!!! What could be more American than that!!!
funny how rock n roll seems to have become such a universal sound too. but alas, it must be our low culture appealing to the common masses, unawares of our insidious plan to infiltrate their minds with our garbage in hopes of lower the global common denominator.
'
Plato had justification for wishing that inferior art be banished from his ideal Republic --- which was, of course, a metaphor for banishing it from the life and consciousness of the individual person.
Why stop at just banishing "inferior art"? Let's just banish "inferior people." That way, there will no longer be consumers of inferior art! Problem solved.
"I know, it's only rock 'n roll, but I like, like it, yes I do!"
Awesome list, Martha!!
Thank you. And the more I think about my choices and read this thread, I realize that, to me, an honest attempt at art, even Art, needs to present what the person perceives as truth and/or in some way pushes the envelope.
I'm not as highfallutin' as Numan.
Why stop at just banishing "inferior art"? Let's just banish "inferior people." That way, there will no longer be consumers of inferior art! Problem solved.
You're really stretching for it there, aren't you?
.
Plato had justification for wishing that inferior art be banished from his ideal Republic --- which was, of course, a metaphor for banishing it from the life and consciousness of the individual person.
Which is why I've alwaya believed Aristotle to be far superior to Plato.
Why stop at just banishing "inferior art"? Let's just banish "inferior people." That way, there will no longer be consumers of inferior art! Problem solved.
You're really stretching for it there, aren't you?
Nah. Just another form of Nazi-like thinking.
Sort of like people who cough shouldn't be allowed outside.
Yep, he certainly is a Master baiter.
Am I a baiter, or am I just someone who is trying to get people to think in something other than
clichés?
You know, for there to be a baiter, there must be someone who is baited.
If people would just calm down and look dispassionately at the pros and cons of a matter, the intellectual life of the human race would be more aesthetically pleasing.
.
Why stop at just banishing "inferior art"? Let's just banish "inferior people." That way, there will no longer be consumers of inferior art! Problem solved.
You're really stretching for it there, aren't you?
.
`he's really not saying anything you haven't already said, nu-man.
The "purity of the soul"??? Well, damn, my soul must be fetid, putrid mess...because when all is said and done, just gimme some of that ol' time rock & roll!!! What could be more American than that!!!
"Musical modes are nowhere altered without changes in the most important laws of the state."--- Damon of Athens
[quoted in Plato's Republic].
Yep, he certainly is a Master baiter.
Am I a baiter, or am I just someone who is trying to get people to think in something other than
clichés?
You know, for there to be a baiter, there must be someone who is baited.
If people would just calm down and look dispassionately at the pros and cons of a matter, the intellectual life of the human race would be more aesthetically pleasing.
.
perhaps you really are sincere in your endeavors nu-man, which really makes it all the more disturbing.
funny how rock n roll seems to have become such a universal sound too. but alas, it must be our low culture appealing to the common masses, unawares of our insidious plan to infiltrate their minds with our garbage in hopes of lowering the global common denominator.
How percipient of you to realize this truth.
.
Of course, rock and roll was hugely influenced by British performers - some of whom were influenced, in turn, by American blues - but I think there would be a bit of an uproar in Great Britain if Americans were to take all credit for the art form.
You know who I'm talking about - bands like, oh, the Rolling Stones, and the Kinks, and those other guys (there were four of them, but really they had so little input that it's no wonder I can't think of the name...)
Plato had justification for wishing that inferior art be banished from his ideal Republic --- which was, of course, a metaphor for banishing it from the life and consciousness of the individual person.
Which is why I've always believed Aristotle to be far superior to Plato.
You should remember that Plato was the teacher of Aristotle.
To write about one or the other being superior to the other is a singularly unproductive way of thinking --- they are not really comparable. They were, in general, pursuing different purposes.
All my life I have heard so much blither about Plato! If only people would actually read Plato, rather than parroting the
clichés they have heard about him!
People seem to be determined to misunderstand the
Republic! Plato had his political ideas, but the Republic should be viewed primarily as an extended metaphor, as a disquisition upon the proper ordering of the individual human soul. For cryin' out loud, Plato himself says this as clearly as anyone could:
"{Glaucon and the rest] wanted to arrive at the truth, first, about the nature of justice and injustice, and secondly, about their relative advantages. I told them what I really thought: that the enquiry would be of a serious nature, and would require very good eyes. Seeing then, I said, that we are no great wits, I think that we had better adopt a method which I may illustrate thus: suppose that a short-sighted person had been asked by some one to read small letters from a distance; and it occurred to some one else that they might be found in another place, which was larger, and in which the letters were larger --if they were the same text, and he could read the larger letters first, and then proceed to the smaller -- this would have been a rare piece of good fortune!
Very true, said Adeimantus; but how does the illustration apply to our enquiry?
I will tell you, I replied; justice, which is the subject of our enquiry, is, as you know, sometimes spoken of as the virtue of an individual, and sometimes as the virtue of a State.
True, he replied.
And is not a State larger than an individual?
It is.
Then, in the larger, the quantity of justice is likely to be larger and more easily discernible. I propose therefore that we enquire into the nature of justice and injustice, first as they appear in the State, and secondly in the individual, proceeding from the greater to the smaller and comparing them."--- Book II, 368D
You know, for there to be a baiter, there must be someone who is baited.
But no harm done unless the baitee is gullible enough to bite.
If people would just calm down and look dispassionately at the pros and cons of a matter, the intellectual life of the human race would be more aesthetically pleasing.
If that means to make no judgments at all, I completely agree. But since the second part of that sentence
is a judgment, I guess that's not what you meant.
Ya know, I used to hear this stuff when I worked for Russian-American TV. The Russkies would grumble and snort "Amerikka not have any culture!"
It's a stuffy, elitist sort of argument that attempts to narrowly define what constitutes culture itself in the first place, and then when anything outside it's tiny sphere intrudes, the reaction is to narrow the circle further in an attempt to exclude more.
I see it used everywhere, from country clubs that dread "Jews and Negroes" to Taliban purists who insist that everyone else is
"not a true Muslim" to auto race sanctioning bodies that rule out previously qualified engines that win too many races.
But if it's one thing America is the very best at, it's at being the Great Cultural Aggregator and Integrator.
From the American cultural mixing bowl have come the very greatest hybrid cultural offspring and indeed, the very greatest dissemination of culture itself.
But the anti-miscegenation wing of the cultural purists are routinely horrified that anyone would dare to mix cultural inputs, to which I can only quote in response from Steve Martin:
"Funky Tut - he's mah favorite HONKY!"
That's a cultural grab and paste spanning what, six thousand years? Stick THAT in your Thomas Eakins.
"{Glaucon and the rest] wanted to arrive at the truth, first, about the nature of justice and injustice, and secondly, about their relative advantages. I told them what I really thought: that the enquiry would be of a serious nature, and would require very good eyes. Seeing then, I said, that we are no great wits, I think that we had better adopt a method which I may illustrate thus: suppose that a short-sighted person had been asked by some one to read small letters from a distance; and it occurred to some one else that they might be found in another place, which was larger, and in which the letters were larger --if they were the same text, and he could read the larger letters first, and then proceed to the smaller -- this would have been a rare piece of good fortune!
Very true, said Adeimantus; but how does the illustration apply to our enquiry?
I will tell you, I replied; justice, which is the subject of our enquiry, is, as you know, sometimes spoken of as the virtue of an individual, and sometimes as the virtue of a State.
True, he replied.
And is not a State larger than an individual?
It is.
Then, in the larger, the quantity of justice is likely to be larger and more easily discernible. I propose therefore that we enquire into the nature of justice and injustice, first as they appear in the State, and secondly in the individual, proceeding from the greater to the smaller and comparing them."
--- Book II, 368D
Im gonna write a little letter,
Gonna mail it to my local dj.
Its a rockin rhythm record
I want my jockey to play.
Roll over beethoven, I gotta hear it again today.
You know, my temperatures risin
And the jukebox blows a fuse.
My hearts beatin rhythm
And my soul keeps on singin the blues.
Roll over beethoven and tell tschaikowsky the news.
I got the rockin pneumonia,
I need a shot of rhythm and blues.
I think Im rollin arthiritis
Sittin down by the rhythm review.
Roll over beethoven rockin in two by two.
Well, if you feel you like it
Go get your lover, then reel and rock it.
Roll it over and move on up just
A trifle further and reel and rock it,
Roll it over,
Roll over beethoven rockin in two by two.
Well, early in the mornin Im a-givin you a warnin
Dont you step on my blue suede shoes.
Hey diddle diddle, I am playin my fiddle,
Aint got nothin to lose.
Roll over beethoven and tell tschaikowsky the news.
You know she wiggles like a glow worm,
Dance like a spinnin top.
She got a crazy partner,
Oughta see em reel and rock.
Long as she got a dime the music will never stop.
Roll over beethoven,
Roll over beethoven,
Roll over beethoven,
Roll over beethoven,
Roll over beethoven and dig these rhythm and blues.Chuck Berry -- 1956
Of course, rock and roll was hugely influenced by British performers - some of whom were influenced, in turn, by American blues - but I think there would be a bit of an uproar in Great Britain if Americans were to take all credit for the art form.
You know who I'm talking about - bands like, oh, the Rolling Stones, and the Kinks, and those other guys (there were four of them, but really they had so little input that it's no wonder I can't think of the name...)
ill give your assertion this much, julia, the brits did advance the form light years,
but rock and roll is purely american. but
funny how rock n roll seems to have become such a universal sound too. but alas, it must be our low culture appealing to the common masses, unawares of our insidious plan to infiltrate their minds with our garbage in hopes of lowering the global common denominator.
How percipient of you to realize this truth.
.
the truth is, i like doughnuts for breakfast but can't eat them because the sugar makes me irritable.
Of course, rock and roll was hugely influenced by British performers - some of whom were influenced, in turn, by American blues - but I think there would be a bit of an uproar in Great Britain if Americans were to take all credit for the art form.
You know who I'm talking about - bands like, oh, the Rolling Stones, and the Kinks, and those other guys (there were four of them, but really they had so little input that it's no wonder I can't think of the name...)
ill give your assertion this much, julia, the brits did advance the form light years,
but rock and roll is purely american. but
Paul McCartney once said that there would have been no Beatles if there hadn't first been Crickets, referring, of course, to Buddy Holly and the Crickets.
And is not a State larger than an individual?
It is.
'
It has been noted that subtlety in artistic expression seems to flourish in compact, homogeneous cultures.
As examples, one may point to Japan and traditional English culture.
The smallest hints may convey a world of meaning to those who share a common body of discourse.
In contrast, large heterogenous states, like the USA, lack subtlety, because people of widely different backgrounds literally do not understand what other people are saying.
In such conditions, subtlety and wit are almost impossible, and only the loudest, coarsest expression is likely to be understood.
In Japan and England, litotes, or understatement, flourishes, while Americans are notorious for hyperbole.
Consider the (highly superior) writing of Aldous Huxley, and compare it with the blatant, in-your-face style of Mark Twain or Gore Vidal.
In humor, I may express what I mean by citing these two examples:
A Texan, having bragged at length to an Englishman about the superiority of Texas in all things, concluded: "And do you know that all of little-bitty ole England would fit into just one corner of Texas?" The Englishman replied in a tone of sweet innocence: "Yes, and wouldn't it do wonders for the place!"
Versus:
An American, travelling with his son in England, met two Englishmen whilst riding in a first-class railway carriage. They began talking to each other, and the American enjoyed the conversation very much. Just before parting, the American said, "I've enjoyed this very much, but I still don't know your names." One of the travellers said, "Oh, I am the Earl of Widwater, and this is my friend, His Grace the Duke of Chalfont." The American replied, "Well, I am pleased to make your acquaintance, and may I introduce my son, Jesus Christ."
.
In your second "joke", how is it that the cultured Englishmen are so devoid of proper etiquette as to not introduce themselves but deign to carry on a conversation with an uncouth American?
the truth is, i like doughnuts for breakfast but can't eat them because the sugar makes me irritable.
Ah, that explains it!
PS: By the way, thank you for exemplifying American hyperbole.
.
In your second "joke", how is it that the cultured Englishmen are so devoid of proper etiquette as not to introduce themselves but deign to carry on a conversation with an uncouth American?
I was hoping no one would notice that --- but after all, it is an American joke, not an English one.
now you see, i prefer corn pones. but there are some who wouldn't understand the virtue of such a local food because they have not had the advantage of experiencing such a local culture. instead, they rely upon the parochial misconception that they have experienced all that could possibly be experienced; in short they believe they have reached the apex of indulgence. too bad, really, 'cause corn pones, hot off the skillet, smattered in hot butter, with a helping of fresh cut greens soaked in pepper vinegar, well not even the finest palate would pass it up if that palate was adventurous enough to indulge in such a low economy.
Consider the (highly superior) writing of Aldous Huxley, and compare it with the blatant, in-your-face style of Mark Twain or Gore Vidal.
I'll see your Huxley and raise him with a Kinky Friedman.
There's more subtlety in Kinky's little finger than a planet full of Huxleys.
And there's always Harlan Ellison.
If you can't see the subtlety in Ellison you should lose a finger.
Consider the (highly superior) writing of Aldous Huxley, and compare it with the blatant, in-your-face style of Mark Twain or Gore Vidal.
I'll see your Huxley and raise him with a Kinky Friedman.
There's more subtlety in Kinky's little finger than a planet full of Huxleys.
And there's always Harlan Ellison.
If you can't see the subtlety in Ellison you should lose a finger.
but but ... kinky's a texican. you cain't git no more low brow then a texican.
"You cannot truely appreciate Shakespeare until you've heard it in the original Klingon."
remember folks, for those of us arguing with our esteemed expat, we are 'mericans and by virtue of that fact, would lose said argument. we cain't gain no ground 'cause we ain't got none in the first place.
"You cannot truely appreciate Shakespeare until you've heard it in the original Klingon."
now you're talking brother.
Ya know, I used to hear this stuff when I worked for Russian-American TV. The Russkies would grumble and snort "Amerikka not have any culture!"
It's a stuffy, elitist sort of argument that attempts to narrowly define what constitutes culture itself in the first place, and then when anything outside it's tiny sphere intrudes, the reaction is to narrow the circle further in an attempt to exclude more.
Well, culture is very important to Russians.
It is true that the worship of culture can degenerate into snobbism, but this is true only of people with baser characters. True culture expands one's horizons; it does not narrow them.
Americans tend to be so defensive when confronted with culture. It is an indication that, on some level, they understand that they are lacking in this regard.
.
Strang;
I’ve read just about all of The Kinkster’s novels and have a few favorites, Road Kill and Elvis, Jesus, and Coca Cola come to mind. But I was wondering how he did in the governors election? Never heard much about that and was wondering if old Kinky was subsequently found swinging from a shower curtain rod?
they understand that they are lacking in this regard.
i always felt the british lacked an overall creativity in their food.
"You cannot truly appreciate Shakespeare until you've heard it in the original Klingon."
Well, I have studied the pronuciation of English in Shakespeare's time. It is quite different from both American English and modern Received Pronuciation in Britain. It does deepen one's appreciation of Shakespeare to hear it as he would have spoken it.
I find it as disagreeable to listen to the language of modern English Shakespearean actors as to hear Americans mangle the language.
[The horror of listening to Charleton Heston attempting to act in Julius Caesar I shall never, never forget!]PS: Schlack, of all modern English dialects, Irish English comes closest to Shakespeare's language. Cromwell and all those other Tudor and Stuart invaders, you know.
Americans tend to be so defensive when confronted with culture. It is an indication that, on some level, they understand that they are lacking in this regard.
This defensiveness explains the surprising number of firearms at Lincoln Center. Heck, I've noticed the same thing right here at Opera Omaha.
Ya know, I used to hear this stuff when I worked for Russian-American TV. The Russkies would grumble and snort "Amerikka not have any culture!"
It's a stuffy, elitist sort of argument that attempts to narrowly define what constitutes culture itself in the first place, and then when anything outside it's tiny sphere intrudes, the reaction is to narrow the circle further in an attempt to exclude more.
Well, culture is very important to Russians.
It is true that the worship of culture can degenerate into snobbism, but this is true only of people with baser characters. True culture expands one's horizons; it does not narrow them.
Americans tend to be so defensive when confronted with culture. It is an indication that, on some level, they understand that they are lacking in this regard.
.
The Russians have an eight hundred year head start, so I grant them their lead graciously. The Euros on the other hand, have had opportunity after opportunity to plant their seed here, but instead of letting it bloom and flourish they opted to treat America as the redheaded stepchild, so America told Europe to stick it where the sun don't shine.
But in any case, whether it's a sandy haired Van Cliburn wowing the crowds in the heart of Vienna while doing "cover tunes" or a
boisterous Leon Russell holding a tent revival in Japan to a sold out house with his wholly original compositions, or an Ed Ruscha painting hanging in a revered spot at the Centre Georges Pompidou, or a Frank Lloyd Wright craftsman home holding its stateliness in Illinois, one thing is certain, the culture wars will never be won so it makes more sense to fraternize with the enemy instead of ridiculing the opposition.
Great things always come of such illicit affairs.
Paul McCartney once said that there would have been no Beatles if there hadn't first been Crickets, referring, of course, to Buddy Holly and the Crickets.
Say it isn't so! I thought he was referring to the
bea insects.
i always felt the british lacked an overall creativity in their food.
It has been said that every country has bad cooking, but only the British specialize in it.
And there is the old joke:
"Heaven is where: the police are English, the cooks are French, the lovers Italian, the mechanics German, and the whole place is run by the Swiss.
Hell is where: the police are German, the cooks are English, the lovers Swiss, the mechanics French, and the whole place is run by the Italians."In fairness, it must be said that British cooking has improved to an amazing extent in recent decades. And English breakfasts have always been great; the very best part of their traditional cooking. They are the foundation of the wonderful breakfasts you find in the American South.
.
It is true that the worship of culture can degenerate into snobbism, but this is true only of people with baser characters. True culture expands one's horizons; it does not narrow them.
Alas. We've tried so hard and still you refuse to expand.
"You cannot truly appreciate Shakespeare until you've heard it in the original Klingon."
Well, I have studied the pronuciation of English in Shakespeare's time. It is quite different from both American English and modern Received Pronuciation in Britain. It does deepen one's appreciation of Shakespeare to hear it as he would have spoken it.
I find it as disagreeable to listen to the language of modern English Shakespearean actors as to hear Americans mangle the language.
[The horror of listening to Charleton Heston attempting to act in Julius Caesar I shall never, never forget!]PS: Schlack, of all modern English dialects, Irish English comes closest to Shakespeare's language. Cromwell and all those other Tudor and Stuart invaders, you know.
SWISH! Hand passing over head?
"You cannot truly appreciate Shakespeare until you've heard it in the original Klingon."
Well, I have studied the pronuciation of English in Shakespeare's time. It is quite different from both American English and modern Received Pronuciation in Britain. It does deepen one's appreciation of Shakespeare to hear it as he would have spoken it.
I find it as disagreeable to listen to the language of modern English Shakespearean actors as to hear Americans mangle the language.
[The horror of listening to Charleton Heston attempting to act in Julius Caesar I shall never, never forget!]PS: Schlack, of all modern English dialects, Irish English comes closest to Shakespeare's language. Cromwell and all those other Tudor and Stuart invaders, you know.
man, nu-man, now you're pushing the envelope. well, i'll agree that anything heston did was awful, but i sure as hell would love to hear those old english recordings you have. must be fun to listen to a dialect so old. i'll be there is all that wonderful scratchy.
PS: Schlack, of all modern English dialects, Irish English comes closest to Shakespeare's language. Cromwell and all those other Tudor and Stuart invaders, you know.
My British friend (who lives in northern England and sounds Scottish to me) says my accent (I was born and raised in the south) is the closest to what she thinks of as an American accent.
Numan, you wouldn't last a minute in my small town full of musicians and artists of all kinds.
We're terribly uncouth.
Ask the surrounding counties.
Judging art is so subjective.
I don't really understand this whole conversation.
But then I've been out of town and haven't read every single post.
Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Art, music, sculpture, clean water, clean air, pretty girls, great schools, great food, great health care and hardly a condescending note in the whole cacaphony of culture to be found.
With Minneapolis and San Francisco we have a couple of very nice European cities, stocked with culturally savvy American, of course.
Oh, and a very well known American bard that even the Russians respect, named BOB DYLAN.
The event also represents an unprecedented collaborative opportunity for scholars from more than a dozen disciplines in the humanities, social sciences, engineering, and business, many of whom have come to identify their work as part of the emerging area of "Dead Studies." This kind of collaboration emphasizes academic rigor and a traditional multi-disciplinary perspective, according to University of South Carolina oral historian Nicholas Meriwether, author of All Graceful Instruments: The Contexts of the Grateful Dead Phenomenon, recently published by Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
"Ultimately," says Meriwether, "the Dead phenomenon suggests a new way of looking at yourself, of what we are capable of in a modern western society that appears increasingly fragmented, media-driven, manipulated and alienating...In an era in which academics are increasingly aware of the need to collaborate across disciplinary lines, a topic with as broad-based an appeal as the Dead phenomenon should be fascinating--and welcome."
Unbroken Chain: The Grateful Dead in Music, Culture and Memory at UMass Amherst It's a matter of perspective and what you want out of life.
I don't want to be that narrow to not see beauty where beauty is regardless of it's so called....
pedigree.
OT: Thanks for the reminder; I almost missed Dylan's radio show. The man is an amazing musicologist. My BIL won't listen to it because "he plays weird sh*t." Dylan's explanation is that he doesn't want to play music everyone has heard; he wants to play the stuff you haven't heard but ought to. Everything from Memphis Minnie to Tom Waits.
Which reminds me of another distinctly American piece of culture.
JOHNNY CASH.
In his eulogy Bob Dylan said that "Johnny Cash was the North Star".
Quite fitting.
Late, late, too late to read all 12 plus pages, at the risk of being redundant may I add Bluegrass (though we stole it from our Irish brothers and sisters), Country and Western, Dixieland,
Zydeco and one more,
Jolie Blon by Jo-el Sonnier - which is, well, if you don't like real C&W you won't like this Zydeco song, skip it; West Coast IPA (Laugh, laugh you wastrels! England created IPA and California, Washington and
most especially Oregon created a style of IPA that transcends all IPAs the world over); and TV preaching. I'm serious.
Look, I hate TV preaching as much as I hate ballet, ice skating, choral singing, bars in Salt Lake City, US Airways, the BCS, snow, mutton, ties (especially bow-ties; I don't own a feckin tie), family reunions, oyster stew, anything except sleep before 10.00 AM, sweet cornbread, small talk at forced gatherings, ANYONE who rings my doorbell, vodka, people who hate France, the mistreatment of animals - including hunting, Washington DC, and marching bands,
however, TV preaching is now an art form and that cannot be denied.
Love your style, SM!
I love zydeco (truly I do...fascinated by it) but I love ballet too.
Sorry can't help it...dancin is dancin and dancin is good.
I don't own a tie either and anymore panty hose.
My daughter was in marching band....so well. You know.
I'm not
up on tv preachin....so I'll take your word for it.
Yikes! How could I have not included
Clifton Chenier? Sorry.
Computer problems. Can't get the youtubes yet...
England created IPA and California, Washington and most especially Oregon created a style of IPA that transcends all IPAs the world over)
Well I am proud and happy you recognize the deliciousness of Oregon IPA’s. They have taken the malts and especially the hops to a new level. Bridgeport out of Portland makes the best large produced IPA, bottles and draft IMO but there are many smaller players in Oregon that produce fine quaffing IPA’s.
Ninkasi in good ol Eugene puts out something called Tricerahops Double IPA that will knock your beer moustache off with double everything and comes in at 8.8% alc/vol. An artform in itself. Enough said.
i hate....marching bands,
There you--and I-- go again! Check out these guys (and gals) from, you guessed it, Oregon---March Fourth Marching Band. They just might change forever your opinions on marching bands.
March Fourth Band
But...marching bands aren't distinctly American in origin - even if a large part of their time is spent on football fields.
I won't say I hate marching bands; I'll just say I'm not fond of brass.
I love this thread. Once everyone got on board with the topic, "what's distinctive about American arts and letters", it really took off. Thanks numan!
"What is distinctive about American art and letters"
I have a theory... but it takes a little explaining.
I was visiting Europe with my wife (who is from Europe). We were having a lovely time... sitting on a park bench overlooking a river. My wife was a little tired, and I encouraged her to stretch out on the bench with her head on my lap.
Later on, my wife told me how difficult this was for her to do. People in Europe do not stretch out on park benches... it is NOT DONE.
So my theory is that the "old culture" has a lot of rules that people have absorbed into their being. And, I think that America is a place that is more free to try different things... outside the rules. IMO this is why an improvisational art form called Jazz evolved in the USA.
In letters, consider the example of Mark Twain. I think he was pretty much the first author to successfully incorporate the vernacular of common people into literature.
Of course now there are improvisational artists also in Europe... but I think this was a distinctive gift of American arts and letters. And, yes, I know there are down sides also... there is a lot of improvisational crxp as well.
In letters, consider the example of Mark Twain. I think he was pretty much the first author to successfully incorporate the vernacular of common people into literature.
he is certainly credited here and it seems to make the more squeamish, erudite types uptight. mark twain equalized literature. he was, is, and always will be, the quintessential american. and that is a compliment.
I was visiting Europe with my wife (who is from Europe). We were having a lovely time... sitting on a park bench overlooking a river. My wife was a little tired, and I encouraged her to stretch out on the bench with her head on my lap.
depends on age really, cant see too many 50 year olds doing this, 15-20 year olds would be another matter entirely!
I love this thread. Once everyone got on board with the topic, "what's distinctive about American arts and letters", it really took off. Thanks numan!
Me, too! I've just e-mailed my friend Tessa to borrow any Clifton Chenier CDs.
'
I really wish people would not use acronyms. I have no idea what "IPA" is supposed to mean. The only thing that it suggests to me is the "International Phonetic Alphabet."
.
"IPA" stands for India Pale Ale, which is a style of ale known for its distinct "hoppiness." It's certainly my favorite.
Well, I like the work of Bob Dylan, too. On a good day, when I am feeling particularly sunny, I will entertain the proposition that it lies at least upon the fringes of Great Art. "Mr. Tambourine Man" is my especial favorite.
I do not like Bob Dylan the man. I think that his style and attitudes, in general, have a depressing and negative effect on the people who listen to him. He is usually morose, whiny, full of put-downs, often nasty, and sometimes even trivial
[Typically American, now that I come to think of it]. I usually do not care much for his later work; I fear that when he suffered that terrible motorcycle accident, something magical departed from his psyche. (Great artists should never expose themselves to danger; the loss to the world is too great if they are injured)
Now I would never for a moment suggest that we should judge the work of an artist by his or her character as a person, but their character may stand as a barrier to the higher realms of art and culture. Judging by most of what Dylan produced, we would never know that such things as the Good, the True, the Harmonious, and the Beautiful even existed.
In the end, Allen Ginsberg is a greater poet than Bob Dylan. He plumbed the depths and heights of human experience far more than the usually superficial Dylan; the Good and the Beautiful were ever at the forefront of his concerns and its guiding star. HIs short poem in
Howl on a flower blooming amid the dust and ashes of a railway freight yard is a classic of enlightened conscousness. The poem
Howl itself is Great Art, and, incidentally, one the the most objective views of the America of his time --- or of present day America, for that matter.
"IPA" stands for India Pale Ale, which is a style of ale known for its distinct "hoppiness." It's certainly my favorite.
chuck, nu-man is above that sort of thing. american micro brewery is too, well, american.
But...marching bands aren't distinctly American in origin
That’s true, but their style and performance art (they must be seen as well as heard) is distinctly American having influences that begin in jazz and head off from there. They are not your mothers marching band.
You got here with that info first, Chuck. I was going to offer that up.
Speaking of preaching and art...
Rev Howard Finster
Speaking of Bob Dylan, he was in the news recently...
New Jersey Homeowner Calls Cops on Bob Dylan "He was really nice, though, and he said he understood why I had to verify his identity and why I couldn't let him go," Buble said. "He asked me if I could drive him back to the neighborhood when I verified who he was, which made me even more suspicious.
"I pulled into the parking lot," she said, "and sure enough there were these enormous tour buses, and I thought, 'Whoa.'"
Her sergeant met her at the hotel parking lot.
"I got out of my car and said, "Sarg, this guy says he's Bob Dylan,'" Buble said. "He opened the car door, looked in, and said, 'That's not Bob Dylan.'"
"So we go over to the tour bus and knock on the door and some guy answers and I say, 'Are you missing someone?'"
"Who's asking?'' came the reply, according to Buble.
"I was in full uniform, so I say, 'I'm asking! I'm the police.'"
Eventually, the police were shown Dylan's passport, which Buble said she looked at, saw the legend's name, and rather sheepishly handed it back to Dylan's manager.
I don't know that much about Bob Dylan the person but that doesn't sound very morose and whiny to me.
I have to say, numan, though I often agree with you politically, I find your constant put downs of Americans to be very much as you described Bob Dylan's demeanor (which may be for all I know...I just don't know that).
I truly don't understand why you want to hang out with us.
Dylan doesn't look like the image we all think of, that's for sure - but it's been a long road with some rough miles.
I try to keep the artist separate from the person. On Dylan's radio show he has a wry sense of humor and is very good at poking fun of all kinds of things.
I have to admit I don't keep the artist and the person apart usually especially if it's stuff I really really like.
Then I go look at what their life and interests are. Their political beliefs if they are known. Their activism, etc.
Maybe I'm a snob but I have a hard time supporting art or music from somebody I have fundamental moral differences with.
"IPA" stands for India Pale Ale, which is a style of ale known for its distinct "hoppiness." It's certainly my favorite.
chuck, nu-man is above that sort of thing. american micro brewery is too, well, american.
Once again, your judgment about me is in error, as is also your notion about micro-breweries. It is, perhaps, an example of the inward-looking self-absorption of the American character to imagine that micro-breweries are an exclusively American phenomenon.
On those rare occasions when I quaff beer, I enjoy it very much, though it must, of course, adhere to the
deutsche Reinheitsgebot, --- the German Purity Law. No contamination by North American commercial additives, please!
.
man, nu-man, now you're pushing the envelope. well, i'll agree that anything heston did was awful, but i sure as hell would love to hear those old english recordings you have. must be fun to listen to a dialect so old.
Why would I bother with recordings? I recite Shakespeare to myself aloud. I want the poetry to which I listen to be of the highest quality.
There is one recording to which I do listen --- over and over. It is a recording of the poetry of Percy Bysshe Shelley. It is recited by, of all people, Vincent Price! He was a much more cultivated man than most people realize. I have never heard Shelley better read. It is on the old Caedmon label, and if you get a chance to hear it, do so! It will probably change your view of Shelley's poetry forever!
.
Numan, inward looking is not all bad. you should try it sometime.
Why would I bother with recordings? I recite Shakespeare to myself aloud. I want the poetry to which I listen to be of the highest quality.
Ok, that was truly cute, numan.
I like our vinyl. I know you're talking about a different thing but music of old sounds better with the imperfections.
Depends on your definition of "quality" I guess though.
"IPA" stands for India Pale Ale, which is a style of ale known for its distinct "hoppiness." It's certainly my favorite.
chuck, nu-man is above that sort of thing. american micro brewery is too, well, american.
Once again, your judgment about me is in error, as is also your notion about micro-breweries. It is, perhaps, an example of the inward-looking self-absorption of the American character to imagine that micro-breweries are an exclusively American phenomenon.
On those rare occasions when I quaff beer, I enjoy it very much, though it must, of course, adhere to the
deutsche Reinheitsgebot, --- the German Purity Law. No contamination by North American commercial additives, please!
.
yes, yes. im quite familiar with german purity laws and all that. and of course american micro breweries are not exclusively american. you miss my point and as phil suggests, perhaps a little introspection on your part and a review of your positions might do you some good. after all, you are beginning to contradict yourself.
I like our vinyl. I know you're talking about a different thing, but music of old sounds better with the imperfections.
Depends on your definition of "quality" I guess though.
Don't throw away your LP's, the tone arms of the world shall rise again!
The best quality LP's still exceed the best CD's in accuracy and quality of sound reproduction.
A very able mathematician-physicist friend of mine estimated that CD's would need to contain 3 to 5 times the quantity of information as they do in order to begin to compete with audiophile-quality analogue LP's.
.
True about CD v. vinyl -- used to be a big issue among DJ's when I was active.
Now it is all digital computer files which can have as much quality as your sound card can deliver.
But I digress
I think that his style and attitudes, in general, have a depressing and negative effect on the people who listen to him. He is usually morose, whiny, full of put-downs, often nasty, and sometimes even trivial [Typically American, now that I come to think of it].
Continuing the spirit of good-natured contentiousness, there is an idiom about the pot calling the kettle black.
(The originator of the idiom may have been William Penn, British founder of the state of Pennslyvania. Said idiom allegedly resides somewhere in his writing,
Some Fruits of Solitude...a piece of work I have no interest in reading for the sole purpose of locating the exact phrasing or context. I have to assume that my disinterest is a direct result of having been born in the United States.)
I wish we had little thumbs up and thumbs down things so we could rate individual posts, because Almost Naomi would get a...
wait! We do!
Continuing the spirit of good-natured contentiousness, there is an idiom about the pot calling the kettle black.
If it is indeed true that I err in this regard, I shall ascribe it to my American heritage and background.
.
If it is indeed true that I err in this regard, I shall ascribe it to my American heritage and background.
Ahhh...but if it
is indeed true, and you can't change that to which you were born, what possible hope is there for such mortals as
we...???
"IPA" stands for India Pale Ale, which is a style of ale known for its distinct "hoppiness." It's certainly my favorite.
chuck, nu-man is above that sort of thing. american micro brewery is too, well, american.
Once again, your judgment about me is in error, as is also your notion about micro-breweries. It is, perhaps, an example of the inward-looking self-absorption of the American character to imagine that micro-breweries are an exclusively American phenomenon.
On those rare occasions when I quaff beer, I enjoy it very much, though it must, of course, adhere to the
deutsche Reinheitsgebot, --- the German Purity Law. No contamination by North American commercial additives, please!
.
Your ignorance is showing, Numan. Most North American micro-brewers would die before they used additives, "commercial" or otherwise.
As for micro-brewing itself, I, for one, never claimed it to be an American original. I said that American micro-brewers raised the bar on IPA. I would consider their worthy efforts to worthy of art. I would also submit that you don't know enough about beer to argue the matter.
"IPA" stands for India Pale Ale, which is a style of ale known for its distinct "hoppiness." It's certainly my favorite.
And you've got great IPA, world class, just over the line in Delaware at Dogfish Head.
Love your style, SM!
I love zydeco (truly I do...fascinated by it) but I love ballet too.
Sorry can't help it...dancin is dancin and dancin is good.
I don't own a tie either and anymore panty hose.
My daughter was in marching band....so well. You know.
I'm not
up on tv preachin....so I'll take your word for it.
I seem to remember the Sanford Marching Band years ago when they marched onto the field and spelled "Urine". That, I liked.
Ahhh...but if it is indeed true, and you can't change that to which you were born, what possible hope is there for such mortals as we...???
I know, but I still hope --- perhaps forlornly.
.
I know, but I still hope --- perhaps forlornly.
Might hanging out with the likes of us evoke faint feelings of nostalgia?
Your concern for our welfare is appreciated. But you
could also just sit back and enjoy us from a distance. We do have fun, in our own base ways. After all, life is short and, in the end, none of what we artistically value...or don't value...matters. Creating and choosing from the heart does.
I like our vinyl. I know you're talking about a different thing, but music of old sounds better with the imperfections.
Depends on your definition of "quality" I guess though.
Don't throw away your LP's, the tone arms of the world shall rise again!
The best quality LP's still exceed the best CD's in accuracy and quality of sound reproduction.
A very able mathematician-physicist friend of mine estimated that CD's would need to contain 3 to 5 times the quantity of information as they do in order to begin to compete with audiophile-quality analogue LP's.
.
No worry, numan
Much of this collection is old and the rest is...old too (and been through other hands).
We listen to it often (last night) and have no plans to exchange it for something else.
We enjoy what we enjoy.
I like our vinyl. I know you're talking about a different thing, but music of old sounds better with the imperfections.
Depends on your definition of "quality" I guess though.
Don't throw away your LP's, the tone arms of the world shall rise again!
The best quality LP's still exceed the best CD's in accuracy and quality of sound reproduction.
A very able mathematician-physicist friend of mine estimated that CD's would need to contain 3 to 5 times the quantity of information as they do in order to begin to compete with audiophile-quality analogue LP's.
.
No worry, numan
Much of this collection is old and the rest is...old too (and been through other hands).
We listen to it often (last night) and have no plans to exchange it for something else.
We enjoy what we enjoy.
thankfully LPs are making a comeback. record companies have been expanding their offerings by producing LPs recently and you can find more and more of them for sale just about anywhere. you can also find great turntable set-ups on e-bay.
thankfully LPs are making a comeback. record companies have been expanding their offerings by producing LPs recently and you can find more and more of them for sale just about anywhere. you can also find great turntable set-ups on e-bay.
Yes, I suppose LPs are makining a comeback. It is nice if only for the nostalgia of it. But, it will reamain a niche market. Very few people have the motivaton or discernment to explore the sonic benifits of the LP.
It is obvious that record companies could ude dvd, or HD DVD to pack huge amounts of information onto a High def. audio recording. And I guess there actually is a format to release high def. audio recordings. But again, the demand is trivial. A playing CD is seldom more that background music to one's life.
And, in the end, there is no recording that can replace a live performance for those who are truly interested in appreciating music.
And, in the end, there is no recording that can replace a live performance for those who are truly interested in appreciating music.
absolutely
we love our albums and enjoy them with an intensity
but as most of you know, we go to music concerts too....a lot.
And, in the end, there is no recording that can replace a live performance for those who are truly interested in appreciating music.
absolutely
we love our albums and enjoy them with an intensity
but as most of you know, we go to music concerts too....a lot.
and im sure you athens folk get some good shows your way.
(Great artists should never expose themselves to danger; the loss to the world is too great if they are injured)
BULLS..T! Everyone, great artist or not, has the right to expose himself to whatever he wants--as long as he doesn't drag anyone else--even a barbaric and uncouth American--along with him.
And, in the end, there is no recording that can replace a live performance for those who are truly interested in appreciating music.
That is true up to a point.
A really good LP recording, played on those very few properly configured sound systems which exist, can reproduce sound with a clarity, linearity, and dynamic range that most people never experience on garden variety sound systems. Listening to a great artist on such a system is far superior to listening to a mediocre performer live.
Just as it is true that the American public has been dumbed down by advertising and other forms of propaganda, so has the tolerance for bad sound reproduction been increased by worse and worse sound recording and penny-pinching motives.
'
Many persons have been mentioned on this thread as paladins of American culture.
Almost all of them are deriviative, or superificial --- or both. [One person even brought up the name of John Wayne! Let me forget that as soon as may be possible!]
Frank Lloyd Wright, Jackson Pollock, the Wyeths, Mark Twain, e e cummings, Robert Frost, Allen Ginsberg, Bob Dylan, Aaron Copland, Alan Hovaniss --- these few are artists who are worthy of deep respect, but beyond them the pickings become slim indeed.
Moreover, European culture has seen many creative revolutions in art, for example, Impressionism. America has been extremely derivative and uninventive, with the exception of jazz and its satellite, rock-and-roll. A rather shaky case might also be made for motion picture technique.
However, if America had produced many times the number of the artists whom I have mentioned, ranking with them in quality, it would still be as nothing compared to the brilliance which has shone forth into the world from Europe.
Starting no earlier than the era when the ill-begotten American Republic was formed, one might mention Mozart and Beethoven in music, and Goethe in literature, who by themselves outshine the whole pantheon of American practioners of their respective arts.
But many Americans, being ignorant, may not have the knowledge to make a just assessment of Goethe. Let us then, almost at random, throw in Shelley, George Bernard Shaw, Aldous Huxley, W. B. Yeats, and Dylan Thomas. They tip the balance decisively in favor of Europe.
As for painting, no one in their right mind would ever rank America's productions with those of Europe! Picasso alone eclipses everything American!
.
Numan, you have missed one of the greatest accomplishments ever in American culture and that is the invention of
High Frequency Trading. In my mind that is the pinnacle of American art, combined with science.
Enjoy reading the article while you quaff a pint of
International Phoenetic Alphabet. Sounds delicious.
'
Many persons have been mentioned on this thread as paladins of American culture.
Almost all of them are deriviative, or superificial --- or both. [One person even brought up the name of John Wayne! Let me forget that as soon as may be possible!]
Frank Lloyd Wright, Jackson Pollock, the Wyeths, Mark Twain, e e cummings, Robert Frost, Allen Ginsberg, Bob Dylan, Aaron Copland, Alan Hovaniss --- these few are artists who are worthy of deep respect, but beyond them the pickings become slim indeed.
Moreover, European culture has seen many creative revolutions in art, for example, Impressionism. America has been extremely derivative and uninventive, with the exception of jazz and its satellite, rock-and-roll. A rather shaky case might also be made for motion picture technique.
However, if America had produced many times the number of the artists whom I have mentioned, ranking with them in quality, it would still be as nothing compared to the brilliance which has shone forth into the world from Europe.
Starting no earlier than the era when the ill-begotten American Republic was formed, one might mention Mozart and Beethoven in music, and Goethe in literature, who by themselves outshine the whole pantheon of American practioners of their respective arts.
But many Americans, being ignorant, may not have the knowledge to make a just assessment of Goethe. Let us then, almost at random, throw in Shelley, George Bernard Shaw, Aldous Huxley, W. B. Yeats, and Dylan Thomas. They tip the balance decisively in favor of Europe.
As for painting, no one in their right mind would ever rank America's productions with those of Europe! Picasso alone eclipses everything American!
.