WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by rporter314 - 03/13/25 08:45 PM
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/11/25 11:16 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 12 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,260,450 my own book page
5,051,255 We shall overcome
4,250,620 Campaign 2016
3,856,275 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,461 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,430
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,538
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#245758 12/11/12 01:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 884
journeyman
OP Offline
journeyman
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 884
Magic Johnson and his crew are now channeling the spirit of the late convicted felon owner of the New York Yankees - George Steinbrenner.

As a Red Sox fan I have mixed emotions about the Dodgers sudden desire to spend....spend...spend since they did relieve the Sox of some rather ill advised and fiscally restrictive contracts but with this sudden surge by the Dodgers does have a trickle down impact on salary structure and eventually competitive balance.

So the famed NYY's have been relegated to second place in the all time season high payroll rankings as the Dodgers total for 2013 season is now 225M and counting.


Only racists oppose my dictatorship.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373
I heard this news on the way to work yesterday. $36m for a 95 m.p.h. South Korean southpaw. My first thought was: Now the Dodger are trying to buy Championships - instead of earning them.

Quote
... this sudden surge by the Dodgers does have a trickle down impact on salary structure and eventually competitive balance.
Exactly. It costs a family of four a minimum of $100 to enjoy a day at the game. The concession prices are outrageous.





Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004
Likes: 133
L
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004
Likes: 133
I like Greger's recipe for dodgers a lot more. They're cheaper, too.

corn dodgers


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
As a Dodgers fan, I am happy if the they can put together a team that will have a shot at winning. And no matter how much they pay, the team will still have to earn their way to a World Series Championship by winning. You have to have talent to win, and talent doesn't come cheap these days. Not in any pro sport. So now we will have to wait until Spring to see if the bang is worth the buck! It's time for Dodger baseball!


milk and Girl Scout cookies ;-)

Save your breath-You may need it to blow up your date.




Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373
Originally Posted by Scoutgal
...You have to have talent to win, and talent doesn't come cheap these days. Not in any pro sport...
  • Is there a difference between paying a pro-Sport player and a CEO?
  • Is it fair to families who support their regional sports team to have to fork-out $100.00 for a family outting?
  • Does sending a message to kids that athletetics is a valuable commoditiy in the best interest of society?
  • What's the percentage of the population that can realistically obtain a pro-Sport position?


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
'

I have an excellent idea -- just ignore these ridiculous childrens' games and do something useful.

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 884
journeyman
OP Offline
journeyman
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 884
Professional sports is entertainment and when you reach the pinnacle the financial rewards are substantial as they are in entertainment for movies to a stage performer. A successful athlete has a unique skill and is paid accordingly. One may disagree with their value to society but the fact is sports are followed and is a huge business and that is quite visible in The World Cup, Super Bowl and Olympics. Who would have ever thought even a few years ago that elite in such sports as a marathoner or a skate boarder would be millionaires with incredible endorsement contracts and their own personal staff.

How the money has changed. I remember in the early 1950s Gordie Howe was the NHL MVP yet had a part time job in the off season. Now the minimum salary in hockey is over $500,000 per year.

Of course the cost is passed on. You are I pay for it by costly seats, inflated product prices and subsidized stadiums.


Only racists oppose my dictatorship.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Originally Posted by california rick
Originally Posted by Scoutgal
...You have to have talent to win, and talent doesn't come cheap these days. Not in any pro sport...
  • Is there a difference between paying a pro-Sport player and a CEO?
  • Is it fair to families who support their regional sports team to have to fork-out $100.00 for a family outting?
  • Does sending a message to kids that athletetics is a valuable commoditiy in the best interest of society?
  • What's the percentage of the population that can realistically obtain a pro-Sport position?

It is what it is, rick. And several of these athletes do great things for kids. And weren't YOU supporting the SF Giants throughout their pennant race and then their win of the World Series? And admonishing me because I would n't support them as a Californian? How hypocritical of you to then try and chastise me now. Except that you are just doing it to be "contrarian extraordinaire"... rolleyes LOL


milk and Girl Scout cookies ;-)

Save your breath-You may need it to blow up your date.




Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 254
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 254
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Of course the cost is passed on. You are I pay for it by costly seats, inflated product prices and subsidized stadiums.

But it's the subsidized stadiums that piss me off.
If they're already bringing in such enormous sums through inflated ticket prices and lucrative broadcast contracts then the rest of the people who live in a city should not be required to PAY for the COST of a stadium that many of them will never be able to afford to set foot in.

It's no different than oil co subsidies. Aren't we already paying enough as it is?
Actually it's worse since the majority of people use oil whereas the majority of people don't buy season tickets.

Pro athletes make more money than God, they get treated like gods and thus they believe they ARE gods.


"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373
Originally Posted by Jeffery J. Haas
It's no different than oil co subsidies. Aren't we already paying enough as it is?
Actually it's worse since the majority of people use oil whereas the majority of people don't buy season tickets.

Pro athletes make more money than God, they get treated like gods and thus they believe they ARE gods.
Good point Jeff. The irony of course is that the average working family can't afford to take their kids to the ballgame because of the salaries of the players and the stadiums.

Someone mentioned the SF Giants. The Giants have salary caps and will let a player go if they don't fit into the budget even if said player is a "winning Giant" and participated in the 2010 or 2012 Championship.

Dodgers on the other hand, have not won a championship since 1988 and, as the OP has pointed out, management is trying to buy a Championship before their investment in the Dodgers goes financially south and there'll be no ROI.


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5