WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Round Table for Spring 2024
by jgw - 06/02/24 05:30 PM
2024 Election Forum
by perotista - 06/02/24 01:50 AM
A question
by jgw - 05/31/24 07:06 PM
No rubbers for Trump
by pdx rick - 05/31/24 04:30 PM
Marching in favor of Palestinians
by jgw - 05/26/24 06:45 PM
Yeah, Trump admits he is a pure racist
by pdx rick - 05/14/24 07:28 PM
Trump's base having second thoughts
by pdx rick - 05/14/24 07:25 PM
Watching the Supreme Court
by pdx rick - 05/14/24 07:07 PM
Trump: "Anti-American authoritarian wannabe
by Doug Thompson - 05/05/24 03:27 PM
Fixing/Engineer the Weather
by jgw - 05/03/24 10:52 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 127 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,136,442 my own book page
5,021,849 We shall overcome
4,202,335 Campaign 2016
3,797,732 Trump's Trumpet
3,019,804 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,292
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
jgw 5
Kaine 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,091
Posts313,849
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
C
old hand
Offline
old hand
C
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
No, LT, you're wrong about me being a closet partisan. I came out of that closet a long time ago. I unabashedly lean to the left and make no apologies for it.

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 128
L
veteran
Offline
veteran
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 128
Originally Posted by Chuck Howard
No, LT, you're wrong about me being a closet partisan. I came out of that closet a long time ago. I unabashedly lean to the left and make no apologies for it.
Okay... so I'm entirely correct to assume that all of your opinions, based upon the fact that you have them and are clear about that (making you a partisan), are unquestionably wrong. How long have you been a member of the Communist Party, if I may ask?


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Originally Posted by Doug Thompson
One needs only to look at the Americans who are losing their existing insurance to see the damage that is already happening and the potential for further destruction.
Americans are "losing their existing insurance" because ACA requires insurance companies to meet key areas of coverage. I believe its nine key areas of coverage - mental health being one of them.

The insurance policies being dropped are high deductible, inferior insurance products which have been grandfathered in. However, it is the insurance companies who are choosing to drop these particular plans even though they don't have to.




Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Originally Posted by california rick
Originally Posted by keysersoze
The number of sign ups are not even close to the levels they should be at.
2000 enrollees a day in California not good enough for you?

Quote
On Tuesday, Obamacare’s state-level insurance marketplaces opened to the public, marking the start of a six-month enrollment period that will stretch into March. Although there’s been some confusion around the health law’s new marketplaces — also known as “exchanges” — initial reports suggest that a significant number of people are seeking out information about reform. States across the country are overwhelmed with huge amounts of traffic to their new exchange websites.

Nice try. Don't drop any water for Obama. How many folks live in the state?
You're asking the wrong question. The correct question to ask is: How many in the state who don't currently have health insurance have signed up?

I already have health insurance. Why do I need to sign up at California Covers™?


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Originally Posted by logtroll
Originally Posted by keysersoze
...The real issue is need of coverage. Nation insurance is a must but how?...
Single-payer - natch. Hmm

Don't vote for R's and we might get it.
LOL Republicans send a single-payer plan through Congress! That's socialism!! Shirley, you gest! smile

(***psssst*** Don't tell 'em that Social Security and Medicare are socialism, they currently don't know these facts... wink )


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Originally Posted by logtroll
I'm getting a bit dizzy, can anyone tell me if I'm really "getting" all this?
Your vertigo is duly noted. Hopefully you have health insurance. smile


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Originally Posted by Doug Thompson
-- Obamacare is a failed system that can't work, won't work and never will work.
Doug
I understand that this is your opinion. But most people make a pretense that their opinion has some basis other than preconception and bias.

Can Obamacare work? Well the system in Mass. is quite similar, it also got off to a difficult start, but now seems to be working well, with no significant damage to the "fragile" system, and not a terrific citizen movement to repeal that program. So on what basis do you form your opinion that that Obamacare cannot work?

As a matter of fact, the international community has a large number of examples of alternative health care systems. And my observation is that there are very many systems that statistically speaking seem to achieve better results than our own pre-obamacare system. These systems manage to deliver medical care to a wider portion of the population, they do not exclude sick people, or poor people. They accomplish the goals of Obamacare. So if we want to "do better" with an alternative system, there are no shortage of options.... are there DOug?

But we all know that any of these non-US models could never be approved in the USA... Regardless of the evidence of better performance. And I think that reality begs the question of WHY? Why should we not have a better system when there are so many good alternatives that are tested and proven elsewhere?

Is the reason because Of President Obama? Well if not, why is the reason?

But getting back to Obamacare.... Are you actually proposing that the Obamacvare model is what Obama would have chosen had he been a dictator able to make an arbitrary decision? I think only the most foolish person would believe that to be true.

So why Obamacare? As you know, Doug.... there are real reasons that we cannot choose a health care model that has already been tested an proven elsewhere. Basically those impediments have to do with things like special interest groups (like the realtors, except that in this case it is the insurance companies) Also the is the issue of ideology.... we worship at the altar of free markets. And finally the issue of partisanship.... which meant that republicans would not agree to anything that would give the administration a "win."

These factors shaped and distorted what was possible.

But.... as you point out.... if you cannot have a perfect answer, why select an imperfect option just because that is all that you can get passed the congress?

And that question gets back to the trajectory of our previous system. Was it going in a good and sustainable direction? And for all sorts of well known reasons, the previous system was spiraling downward.... costs ever escalating, affordability plummeting, a larger and a large portion of the population not covered, safety net care being delivered in the ER, insurance companies competing for healthy customers and trying to shed unhealthy customers, increasing numbers of people being bankrupted by medical expenses... It is an endless depressing litany of a system that was already headed for collapse without Obamacare.


Originally Posted by Doug Thompson
In my opinion, every day it is allowed to continue threatens the already-fragile health care system in this nation.

That's my opinion and it stands.

As above, Doug, I just so not see how you consider the previous situation represented a system not heading for collapse? Nor can I possibly imagine that you would really want to go back to it.

But.... lets put it up for a vote of the people....

On your side.... we will have people who are enthusiastic to return to the situation where insurance companies only want to insure healthy people. Let all the politicians who support this view stand up and earn the support they will certainly receive.




"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
C
old hand
Offline
old hand
C
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
Originally Posted by california rick
Americans are "losing their existing insurance" because ACA requires insurance companies to meet key areas of coverage. I believe its nine key areas of coverage - mental health being one of them.

The insurance policies being dropped are high deductible, inferior insurance products which have been grandfathered in. However, it is the insurance companies who are choosing to drop these particular plans even though they don't have to.

CR, you are relying on awful lot on facts in your comments. Please state whether or not you are partisan so I will know whether or not I can believe any of your facts.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Originally Posted by Chuck Howard
Originally Posted by california rick
Americans are "losing their existing insurance" because ACA requires insurance companies to meet key areas of coverage. I believe its nine key areas of coverage - mental health being one of them.

The insurance policies being dropped are high deductible, inferior insurance products which have been grandfathered in. However, it is the insurance companies who are choosing to drop these particular plans even though they don't have to.

CR, you are relying on awful lot on facts in your comments. Please state whether or not you are partisan so I will know whether or not I can believe any of your facts.

ROTFMOL


milk and Girl Scout cookies ;-)

Save your breath-You may need it to blow up your date.




Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Originally Posted by Chuck Howard
Originally Posted by california rick
Americans are "losing their existing insurance" because ACA requires insurance companies to meet key areas of coverage. I believe its nine key areas of coverage - mental health being one of them.

The insurance policies being dropped are high deductible, inferior insurance products which have been grandfathered in. However, it is the insurance companies who are choosing to drop these particular plans even though they don't have to.

CR, you are relying on awful lot on facts in your comments. Please state whether or not you are partisan so I will know whether or not I can believe any of your facts.


And beyond that....
these less expensive policies the people "want".....
well they are fine for healthy people
as long as you have not big problem.... it is great.

If you get diagnosed with cancer.... then what?
Well.... the insurance company can drop you at time of renewal.... or jack up your premium to an unaffordable level.

But isn't that the whole point of having "insurance?"
I mean, if you will remain healthy.... you do not need insurance. And if the insurance become unavailable if you do need it, well is that really insurance?


It is laughable how many people are interviewed and are outraged at the price of ACA insurance. They are happy with what they have, it is all they need. But our liberal media never asks the obvious follow up question.... what happens with your insurance if you get diagnosed with a long term chronic illness.... will your coverage and rate stay the same?

People are saying that they do not "need" more expensive insurance because they are not sick. Well I do not need car insurance because I am a safe driver who does not get into accidents. I do not need home insurance because my home has not burned down.


"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5