0 members (),
49
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,536
Members6,305
|
Most Online294 Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373
Member CHB-OG
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373 |
Clearly some are in need of a reminder: Criminal Convictions by Administration Executive Branch – Past 50 Years: Nixon – 11 Ford – 1 Carter – 0 Reagan – 7 GHWBush - 1 Clinton - 2 W Bush – 8 Obama – 0 Trump – 1 TOTAL Republicans = 29 Democrats = 2 Source: Wikipedia 
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129 Likes: 257
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129 Likes: 257 |
The punishment is not so much for the defendant, as it is for the next administrations to ponder before committing crimes. If crime has no cost, everybody will do it. And that criminal administration could well be Democratic. Just because Democrats seem to rarely commit crimes in office does not mean it's impossible.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373
Member CHB-OG
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373 |
Just because Democrats seem to rarely commit crimes in office does not mean it's impossible. True. My point is that the people who claim to be "Law and Order" are the people who are committing the crimes. Just as the people who scream "voter fraud" ARE the people who are committing voter fraud. Weird how things work out that way. 
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 608
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 608 |
It is neither Biden's nor Congresses duty to punish the president or his followers. They are tasked with repairing the damage. They are not cops and detectives, they are legislators. Furthermore, it sets a terrible (and extremely dangerous) precedent. Do we really want to convince future Presidents that the only way they can make sure they aren't personally gone after as part of a revenge-cycle between the factions is not to peacefully give up power in accordance with our rules and norms? 'Cuz, the last time I'm aware of a Republic creating that incentive structure, eventually, one of the leading Executives (guy name of Julius) decided he wasn't willing to sacrifice himself to maintain a system on behalf of those who would seek to take it. So we should give the president a pass so a future president doesn't go Juan Peron?
What can we do to help you stop screaming?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831 Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831 Likes: 180 |
So we should give the president a pass so a future president doesn't go Juan Peron? Something like that, yes. Trump has already gone there though, he has re-blogged a follower who says the only good democrat is a dead democrat. So...once this corrupt regime is out of power and records are released that show criminal activity then yes, prosecute. But lets not dwell on it at the legislative level or start congressional investigations just for the sake of revenge. That would make "us" just like the republicans. Exile him to Palm Beach and surround him with Secret Service. He's done. He'll be dead soon. My thoughts are on the future. What's behind us is behind us. This has been, and continues to be a sad time in history. Tilting at that windmill won't make it less so.
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,026 Likes: 98
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,026 Likes: 98 |
How about forcing all candidates for president to submit themselves to being tested by a group of shrinks who could then give the candidate a clean slate or rule that he is not capable enough to have the job?
I am not really convinced that shouldn't apply to most of those who would govern us as well.
I doubt this could ever happen but, at least, its an option?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,080 Likes: 134
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,080 Likes: 134 |
I didn't see that on the list of qualifications in the Constitution.
One would hope the citizenry of our great nation would be able to discern when a candidate is unfit for office, but apparently that is not the case.
ignorance is the enemy without equality there is no liberty Save America - Lock Trump Up!!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373
Member CHB-OG
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373 |
...One would hope the citizenry of our great nation would be able to discern when a candidate is unfit for office, but apparently that is not the case. Look at who 40% of voters are. 
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129 Likes: 257
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129 Likes: 257 |
It isn't in the Constitution in so many words, but there is language about what should happen when the President is unfit to carry out the duties of his office. A law could be made that explicitly directs those in the cabinet or specific congressional officers to carry out their roles in that determination, complete with penalties for not doing it. Like immediate loss of office.
We have had a few insane or unfit Presidents before. Hopefully they would rely on expert medical opinion, instead of making it partisan. I suppose that has to be in the law, or they would.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,080 Likes: 134
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,080 Likes: 134 |
The 25th applies after a Constitutionally qualified person is elected (unless you are a person named Barack Obama, thought by some conservatives to have been born in a foreign country).
Unfortunately we have a situation in which the cabinet and VP would never cross Mr Trump, ergo the 25th would never be under consideration. It helps when the occupant of the WH packs the cabinet with people loyal to him first and foremost.
ignorance is the enemy without equality there is no liberty Save America - Lock Trump Up!!!!
|
|
|
|
|