Capitol Hill Blue Forums Hot Topics & Breaking News News Voter fraud - The Urban Legend

http://electionfraudnews.com/indx.html
..........
"Michael Collins has added substantially to what we know about the chilling reality of E2004, numbers that don't add up to a legitimate election no matter how they are sliced. His "Election 2004: The Urban Legend" is a blockbuster, an analytical romp through the oddest numbers that were never brought to light, never questioned. And boy is there ever something wrong with this picture. - Mark Crispin Miller
...........
Don't know if the link is going to work but it is an interesting article. If you go to the link and click on Urban Legend you'll find it.
This was posted on scoop.co.nz American CoupII. As you can see it is a New Zealand blog.
I've had a very hard time trying to get this to work but if you can get to it, I think you will find that it is very interesting, even if somewhat long and detailed.
Sara

I just tried to the link I posted and it didn't work for me. This was also posted in the Smirking Chimp for June 13. Sorry, I'll go back and try to find a better link.

When I go to electionfraudnews.com the link works for me. Hope it will work now. See-I said I was having a hard time getting this posted. Don't know why. It still is important imho

Interesting article. For those who'd like to know what the article said, without actually reading the article, here is a summary:

In 2004, Bush lost votes in his key areas: Rural and small cities. Even more surprising. Bush picked up votes in large urban cities - traditionally Democratic strong holds - and an area he did little campaigning or spending of ad money.

So while Bush's "base" left him at the polls in 2004, Bush picked up unlikely votes - urban cities in 2004.

An analysis shows a 16% increase of voters from 2000 to 2004 in urban cities, yet Bush picked up over 66% percent of the vote in large urban cities - that's over a 150% increase in 2004 from 2000. Also, statistics show that the majority of voters who voted for Bush in 2004 from the large urban cities were white voters - again traditionally leaning towards voting Democrat.

Amazing and clearly very Rovian, isn't it?

Thanks for reducing my post to "very rovian". I had hoped that some of the CHB gang would read it and find it as astonishing as I did. However, your summary relegated it to the trash pile since it didn't register more than "how rovian" on your scale.

Needless to say, I am somewhat PO'd. Sorry I'm not one of the priviledged few whose comments are considered worthy of consideration. Thanks to your summary apparently no one else even bothered to read it.

There are other blogs who think this is important. Sorry you don't.

So long, farewell, ahvedisein (sp) adieu.

I did give the article a "very" Rovian .

By your own admission, you noted to have linkage problems with the article.

Perhaps the topic didn't register with the Ranters, or the topic simply needed a to get noticed, again.

Don't give up on RR just like that, there is so much going on in D.C. that it's hard to keep up the Bush Administration's shenanigans some days.

I think it is issue fatigue Eager.

i remember we debated almost endlessly about election fraud, die-bold-die, anomolies between exit polls and reported results. fewer voting machines in democratic areas etc.

but that was back when the president still had some supporters willing to post here.

you really need a Senator Hatrack to get a thread really boiling!

Here you go, Sara. This link will work. http://electionfraudnews.com/ Personally, I don't buy into the conspiracy bull, but others may enjoy your link.:-)
Yours,
Issodhos

Don't be quick to jump ship. Many threads are started that don't get full attention. We've all started them and seen them fade away. And I think Schlack is right, it's just that we've done this one to death. Not that it's unworthy, mind you. That said, when I first went to this thread the link didn't work. At any rate, give RR a chance. I think you'll like it hear. Just be patient.

I'm just tired of posts (not necessarily here at CHB) saying that we, the voters, got what we deserved on 2000 and 2004. I think it is fairly obvious that the voters didn't get what they wanted or deserved. This was some fairly new information posted on a New Zealand site and I thought it was worthy of at least a mention.

As a matter of fact I have been "here" for quite some time. Mostly lurking. And I even made a contribution to Doug's campaign. Not that I have much to give but I do what I can.