0 members (),
6
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,540
Members6,305
|
Most Online294 Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 161
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 161 |
The false flag concept is so ugly. I wish that I did not know what our country has done before ... Why would these laws hit the books if nothing was in the works? Do we need martial law in America? Is your passport current? Hate to send you to Prison Planet, but they have it covered.
"Usually, terrible things that are done with the excuse that progress requires them are not really progress at all, but just terrible things." Russell Baker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,290
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,290 |
It probably has a list of the cities considered for "terrist" attacks to start the plan, in order of priority with all the pros and cons politically. NoCal and SoCal are probably safe, due to economic factors, as is Seattle. Portland and Oregon in general are in trouble because those librule, to a fault, tree huggers, need a wake up call about the realities of US politics. Plus the Cascades would prevent that nasty radiation from getting to red state Idaho and Utah, plenty of buffer high desert in between. NYC again, nope, to important to international econ, wall st etc. Wash DC, yeah right, unless you see all the "fearless leaders" suddenly developing a high affinity for the Texass dessert. Birmingham, Kansas City, come on! Who would notice? Plus ya already got the Red State/Neck vote. This protects most of the Red States. Considered Chicago, cause Ill is so blue, and Fitzpatrick lives there, but fallout would probably reach Indiana, so not so good. Denver too close to that hole in some mountain where Cheney likes to hide when it gets "hot". New Orleans, no way, and redundant anyway as La is well on its way to regaining Red State status. I would be interested in others ideas about the prime location for a little nuc action. Upstate NY  why bother, plus the radiation would reach the DC and NYC areas. Vermont is a reasonable choice, except that it doesnt have any cities to target (Rummy why bomb a tent or a goat rationale), trust me I have driven through it many times. It almost as citiless as New Hampshire, but it sure isnt a hyperlibrul wasteland like Vermont. The economy would survive without maple sugar... TAT
Last edited by Tatuma; 09/14/07 09:46 AM.
There's nothing wrong with thinking Except that it's lonesome work sevil regit
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 950
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 950 |
It is amazing that this President has taken the Legislative power out of the hands of the Legislature...of course, it wouldn't be the first time, but Bush seems to be addicted to the usurpation of power and that is an extremely dangerous addiction. National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive
"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them."~Patrick Henry
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,626
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,626 |
If it makes you feel any better, this was covered by the Associated Press and made the rounds in newspapers coast to coast. Problem is, there was no outrage from the majority of elected pols and the issue just went away.
sure, you can talk to god, but if you don't listen then what's the use? so, onward through the fog!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373
Member CHB-OG
|
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373 |
In case any of you Ranters have a visceral negative reaction to reading Prison Plant, here is the document signed May 9, 2007 which is linked below to the White House's server: [b]National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive[/b]
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 161
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 161 |
"It probably has a list of the cities considered for "terrist" attacks to start the plan, in order of priority with all the pros and cons politically..." I think I am safe in Idaho.. Red on Red around here!  I am thinking San Francisco!
"Usually, terrible things that are done with the excuse that progress requires them are not really progress at all, but just terrible things." Russell Baker
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 161
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 161 |
This is so strangely vague...
(b) "Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions;
Any? Regardless of location? Ack..
"Usually, terrible things that are done with the excuse that progress requires them are not really progress at all, but just terrible things." Russell Baker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 223
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 223 |
Hi to california rick and others that have an interest in the martial law issue. I've contacted Pete DeFazio's -D Oregon, Washington Office this AM to find out the status of his attempt to view the Homeland Security martial law plans for the U.S.
I was told his first attempt was done on an informal basis, but since the Whitehouse refused his attempt to view the plans, both he and his Congressional committee members are now sending a formal request to view the plans.
After some discussion with his D.C. office I asked them if they would be interested in my gathered material concerning their plans for us and the offer was well received. I then fax'd my material to DeFazio's DC office and also to his office in Eugene, Oregon.
I plan on keeping on top of this issue because my research indicates they have truly draconian plans for "we the people" that would make the SS and the Gestapo proud of them. Folks we have monsters in our nation's capitol. I have no idea why these bureaucrats hate us so, but they do!
Martial law should be only implemented to protect the nation and it's infrastructure, but not to destroy it's people through forced incarceration by unwarranted mass roundups and worse in such times. My research indicates they will strive to operate with the efficiency of the Germans who ran the camps during WWII, evidently this time "we the people" of the U.S. are part of the NWO's final solution to a long-standing problem; ie, the elimination of people who both love and value freedom. Destroy the U.S. via martial law and they figure they'l then have the planet in their hip pocket.
It would be helpful if others either, called, wrote or fax'd Peter DeFazio's office demanding that he get to the bottom of this martial law planning for the U.S. You cannot contact a Congressional rep outside of your own congressional district since their emailing service is set up only to receive emails from district constituents. You can, call, fax letters or of course snail mail them. You can also E-Fax them if you care to do so.
The more people demand accountability and the right of our elected reps with proper clearances to view such classified material then the better our chances are for survival against a government that has slowly but surely turned into a monster from our worst nightmare.
Carl Nemo **==
Last edited by Carl Nemo; 09/15/07 06:43 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373
Member CHB-OG
|
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373 |
Hi Carl, welcome to Reader Rant. ![[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]](http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f228/ca_rickf/Smilies/welcome.gif) I've read your posts many times on CHB. ![[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]](http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f228/ca_rickf/Smilies/icon_smile.gif) ...My research indicates they will strive to operate with the efficiency of the Germans who ran the camps during WWII... This is the scariest part of your post. Seven years of the Bush Administration has shown that they are a complete failure at everything they touch. One can only assume that things will be extremely bad under a Bush Administration martial law given their propensity to screw the pooch which will probably result in complete anarchy.
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 950
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 950 |
Hi Carl, welcome to Reader Rant. ![[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]](http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f228/ca_rickf/Smilies/welcome.gif) I've read your posts many times on CHB. ![[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]](http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f228/ca_rickf/Smilies/icon_smile.gif) ...My research indicates they will strive to operate with the efficiency of the Germans who ran the camps during WWII... This is the scariest part of your post. Seven years of the Bush Administration has shown that they are a complete failure at everything they touch. One can only assume that things will be extremely bad under a Bush Administration martial law given their propensity to screw the pooch which will probably result in complete anarchy. Oh, not only will it be anarchy, but it will be an insurgent war in this country that will make Iraq look like a walk in the park. Even the War between the States will look decent compared to what will take place if Bush declared Martial Law.
"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them."~Patrick Henry
|
|
|
|
|