Originally Posted by Ardy
We know of course that an person with inherent bias can easily manipulate data... either consciously or not.

If I recall correctly, when he produced his study he was not a gun owner and had little interest in being one. So, how biased he was at the time, who can say? Bear in mind that I was going to provide stereoman with a link to Lott's work because he might be interested in it relative to the claims of logic stereoman made in a post regarding defensive use of handguns.

As to Lott having critics, well, that is hardly surprising. He also has supporters.
Quote
The work was immediately controversial, drawing large amounts of support and opposition. Numerous academics praised Lott's methodology, including Florida State University economist Bruce Benson,[10] Cardozo School of Law professor John O. McGinnis,[11] and University of Mississippi professor William F. Shughart.[12] The book also received favorable reviews from academics Gary Kleck, Milton Friedman, and Thomas Sowell.

...snip...

Referring to the research done on the topic, The Chronicle of Higher Education reported that while most researchers support Lott's findings that right-to-carry laws reduce violent crime, some researchers doubt that concealed carry laws have any impact on violent crime, saying however that "Mr. Lott's research has convinced his peers of at least one point: No scholars now claim that legalizing concealed weapons causes a major increase in crime.
SOURCE:

As to the 2003 article by MotherJones? Puh_lese. MotherJones? John Lott is still at work in 2008.
Quote
John Richard Lott Jr. (born May 8, 1958) is a senior research scientist at the University of Maryland, College Park. He has previously held research positions at other academic institutions including the University of Chicago, Yale University, the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, and the American Enterprise Institute. He holds a Ph.D. in economics from UCLA, and his areas of research include econometrics, law and economics, public choice theory, industrial organization, public finance, microeconomics, labor economics, and environmental regulation.

I have no reason to think that because he has critics, it means his work is substantially flawed.
Yours,
Issodhos


"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos