Originally Posted by stereoman
Originally Posted by issodhos
He was motivated by something other than selflessness.
Here again we see the distinction between the concept of altruism as it is commonly used in modern vernacular and as a technical term in the study of ethics and philosophy. Many of the examples that have been offered by others in this discussion describe the former interpretation, liberated from the necessity of proving the absence of self-interest.

In fact, it seems to me, there is nearly a consensus among us that altruism generally does include some degree of self-interest. The odd man out being you, iss. Which explains very neatly how the rest of us can celebrate our altruism and the altruism of others, whilst you doggedly insist that it doesn't exist.

Actually, I think it is more a case of some folks seeking to redefine the issue so that it will comforably line up with their pat answers. I think it upsets some to think that they are not as morally superior as they perceive themselves to be. As to personal sniping, that began almost immediately. Dodge away. I am a patient man.
Yours,
Issodhos


"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos