Without digging deeper it sounds good to me. Numan's not going to like this though.... it's another damned Constitution Thumper.

Your're right, I don't like the Constitution --- but in this Era of Stagnation during which it is in effect, it should be interpreted by someone who is responsible and knowledgeable.
During most of the history of the United States, the Supreme Court has been the most dangerous, reactionary and irresponsible element in the American system of governance. That was apparent in the Dred Scott decision, during the 1930's, and in 2000, when it outrageously "selected" George W. Bush as president. It is too powerful, and too unchecked; there are many dangers to the American people from their ill-devised Constitution, but the Supreme Court is one of the most dangerous.
As in a monarchy, it functions well when good people are judges, and it functions very badly and dangerously when bad people are there. So, as long as the present Constitution is in effect, it is very important to have good people there.
-