WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by jgw - 03/14/25 07:52 PM
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/11/25 11:16 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 6 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,260,923 my own book page
5,051,281 We shall overcome
4,250,738 Campaign 2016
3,856,333 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,512 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,430
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,540
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
Buzzard's Roost, Troyota
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 10 of 13 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 13
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Some people need to catch up with science. We decide very little with our thinking and almost all with our emotional brain.

Do some reading.


Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
Originally Posted by Mellowicious
If Supreme Court cases were simply a matter of applying/not applying the law, a good law student could go straight from the bar exam to a seat on the Court and little would be lost. It is judgment, as well as (if not more than) knowledge of the law, that makes a good judge, and - speaking only for myself here - in my opinion reason and empathy are both important factors in good judgment.

Excellent points, Julia!

It is unforunate that, looking at the Supreme Court in the broad history of the USA, good judgment has so often been lacking in their decisions --- not to mention empathy and simple humanity.

However, the "selection" of G. W. Bush as President in 2000 was not the worst thing that the Supreme Court has ever done --- that "honor" goes to the Dred Scott decision of 1857, which made the Civil War inevitable.

-

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
C
old hand
Offline
old hand
C
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
Originally Posted by Mellowicious
If Supreme Court cases were simply a matter of applying/not applying the law, a good law student could go straight from the bar exam to a seat on the Court and little would be lost. It is judgment, as well as (if not more than) knowledge of the law, that makes a good judge, and - speaking only for myself here - in my opinion reason and empathy are both important factors in good judgment.

Well put. If the application of law to a given set of operative facts were as formulaic as some seem to think that it is, we would not have 5-4 decisions from the Supreme Court. Instead, they would all be 9-0. There would be no dissenting opinions. Most of the criticism of Judge Sotomayor stems from gross ignorance of how the appellate courts work. In most cases, the ignorance is not willful and, therefore, understandable.

I will again respond to Isshodos' post which excerpts a number of paragraphs from a speech given by Judge Sotomayor. She has a long record as a judge. She has written and joined in (or dissented from) many opinions. If you want to know how she will "judge", the answer can be found in the opinions she has written. I've posted links to one of the better web sites that has endeavored to digest those opinions on various topics. I'm sure there are others.

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
I
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
Originally Posted by Mellowicious
I seem to get the idea from some comments here and elsewhere that reason and empathy are exclusive.

If so, then you have either not read or you have forgotten what I posted earlier in this thread. (emphasis added]
Quote
As to President Obama's choice, and his comments on "empathy" being important in judging, I would suggest that it is a good thing to have at the trial-judge level, perhaps even at the appellate level, but it is most assuredly not what I would want a Supreme Court judge to base the constitutionality of a case on -- or even influence it.

Quote
I do not think that we are that far apart, Chuck Howard, if by "empathy" you simply mean someone having an understanding of the human condition, as opposed to allowing "empathy" to override the law.

It is not a question of empathy and reason being exclusive so much as it is not allowing the subjective to override a pursuit of objectivity. For those gnashing their teeth at the prospect of informing me that objectivity is not fully realizable, save your bandwidth -- perfection is not expected.

Perhaps if someone could provide an example of where a Supreme Court decision was based more on empathy than on reason and the law, I could be convinced to reconsider.
Yours,
Issodhos


"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Dred Scott


Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Oh, wait, Gore v. Florida or whatever that case was


Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
Originally Posted by Phil Hoskins
Oh, wait, Gore v. Florida or whatever that case was
Bush v. Gore
Not to mention: Yasui v. United States, Hirabayashi v. United States, Korematsu v. United States, and Bowers v. Hardwick


"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
And Frederick v. Morse gets an honorable mention simply on the basis that the speech involved wasn't even on school grounds.


"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
I
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
Originally Posted by Phil Hoskins
Dred Scott

So, you present this as a case based more on empathy and you think it bolsters the "empathy over reason" methodology? I would think that it would damage your argument, Phil.
Yours,
Issodhos


"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
There was no law in that case, nor in Gore. Entirely based on emotions. Totally.


Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
Page 10 of 13 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 13

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5