WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by rporter314 - 03/16/25 09:17 PM
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/16/25 09:13 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 17 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,261,144 my own book page
5,051,299 We shall overcome
4,251,076 Campaign 2016
3,856,709 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,904 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,431
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,553
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 17 1 2 3 4 16 17
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
Originally Posted by Schlack
what a bastard

OMG! Are you creating a new sect within the birther movement???


"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
C
old hand
Offline
old hand
C
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
Quote
Let me be clear: as a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country, and will not be treated differently by their government, is essential to who we are. The writ of our Founders must endure.

Thank you, Mr. President. This is, in fact, a First Amendment issue.

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
I
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
Originally Posted by loganrbt
And we ascribe heinous motives to the choice of this location without taking into any consideration the role of the imam who is behind it in calming the situation on the ground at and around ground zero in the days after the disaster and worked extensively with the Bush administration to try to keep this kind of Islamaphobia from taking over the country.

...snip...

This thread is offensive on so many levels it is hard to square its presence with the otherwise reasoned thinking of so many of my friends here. As well as others.
The thing I find contemptable and offensive is the portrayal of New Yorkers as being so evil or so savage that it somehow took a heroic imam to "calm" them. Weird stuff. coffee
Yours in wonderment,
Issodhos


"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Quote
Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds. The Hereafter is for the pious, and there is no enmity save toward the unjust. I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship save Allah alone, and I bear witness that Muhammad is His Slave and Messenger. May Allah bless him, his pure Household, his noble Companions, and all those who follow them in goodness up to the day of Judgement.

Last edited by Greger; 08/15/10 01:04 PM.

Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
Originally Posted by issodhos
The thing I find contemptable and offensive is the portrayal of New Yorkers as being so evil or so savage that it somehow took a heroic imam to "calm" them. Weird stuff. coffee
Yours in wonderment,
Issodhos

Where, or where, did you get that, Iss. Certainly not in my post. What evil lurks inside your heart and mind?


"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,426
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,426
Originally Posted by Phil Hoskins
The President took what appears to me to be a position with no political payoff at all, but one of principle.


This was my first impression as well, and I'm no partisan supporter of this President. A case could probably be made for my naivete, though.


The final war will be between Pavlov's dog and Schroedinger's cat. --Robert Anton Wilson
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,740
Likes: 1
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,740
Likes: 1
Quote
Because of their track record of killing Americans, I can't support the construction of a Ground Zero McDonald's.

twitter link


"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
(Philip K.Dick)

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,643
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,643
Originally Posted by Chuck Howard
Quote
Let me be clear: as a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country, and will not be treated differently by their government, is essential to who we are. The writ of our Founders must endure.

Thank you, Mr. President. This is, in fact, a First Amendment issue.

I would love to have seen the course a similar thread to this one had GWB made the same statement as did Obama.

I'm far from a lover of Obama. I've been pretty vocal about that for sometime. But his statement is in the context exactly as Chuck's post above. I really don't know who can view this issue as being anything other than First Amendment issue despite what anyone chooses to believe what the underlying motives are.

This is America. We are a nation of laws. We are a nation whose common values are built around the Bill of Rights. Either it protects all as written, or it doesn't.

Obama has since added to his statement saying (paraphrasing) that he is sticking what he said, but also in light of the symbolism of that location, it isn't a very wise decision to construct the Mosque in that chosen location. I can agree with that. But, I also believe in the First Amendment.

If the Mosque turns out to be a meeting place for terrorists who setup office to plan out the next attacks...and to store weapons of mass destruction...then we have a different ball game.

But, even if the Mosque is a rub-in-the-face statement of contempt for Americans and want the Mosque's presence to be a reminder of such contempt, then its up to the individual as to whether or not to give power and satisfaction to those who are voicing their contempt via the construction of Mosque.

Just my 2 cents...thanks






Turn on ANY brand of political machine - and it automatically goes to the "SPIN and LIE CYCLE" wink

Yours Truly - Gregg


Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
Originally Posted by Schlack
Quote
Because of their track record of killing Americans, I can't support the construction of a Ground Zero McDonald's.
Droll, Schlack; very droll.

On the other hand, consider the track record of all the religions, and their persistent proclivity for murdering and torturing people.

How many people would commit murder for a McDonald's? (hmmm...I shudder to think!)

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
I
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
Originally Posted by AustinRanter
This is America. We are a nation of laws. We are a nation whose common values are built around the Bill of Rights. Either it protects all as written, or it doesn't.
Oh really? So when I wrote, "In this case the property is privately owned and, to my knowledge, there are no restrictions against building regious buildings on it, so that should settle the matter. All the rest is politics.", was I not saying that the issue does not need to be hyped as a First Amendment issue? Is not the issue laid to rest constitutionally based purely on property rights? Is there any argument in favor of prohibiting this 'Islamban' structure from being built? Is it not stupid to try to muddy the right to build on this privately owned site by dragging religion into it? Of course it is.
Yours,
Issodhos



"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos
Page 2 of 17 1 2 3 4 16 17

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5