WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by pdx rick - 03/16/25 02:19 AM
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/11/25 11:16 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 13 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,261,112 my own book page
5,051,295 We shall overcome
4,251,031 Campaign 2016
3,856,678 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,866 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,431
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,547
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 16 17
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,643
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,643
This might be a little off-topic, but I think it illustrates the mindset of many.

The following link to a CNN video on Huff page titled
Quote
Anderson Cooper Stuns GOP Rep. On 'Terror Babies': 'They Did Not Tell Me You Were Going To Grill Me' (VIDEO)

Terror Babies Being Born In the U.S.

My oh my...leave to a Texas State Legislator to drop this on the public. I have to hold my head in shame. frown


Turn on ANY brand of political machine - and it automatically goes to the "SPIN and LIE CYCLE" wink

Yours Truly - Gregg


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,431
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,431
Likes: 373
Remember when the rebuild of the WTC was supposed to look like this?

[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]

...the rebuild should have been designed this way - the 'Freedom Tower' is for the boids.


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
I agree with the opening premise that this is 1) purely a private property/zoning issue, 2) those who raised the issue did so purely for political purposes. I disagree that the response was "pandering" to anyone/anything. The problem, Iss, is that you constantly - indeed, I can't think of a counter-example - attribute political/pandering motives to anyone who states something that you disagree with. On the contrary, there are many people who have strong ethical reasons for taking stands on subjects, and reasonable people can have different viewpoints.

Personally, I am quite in favor of the religious center being built there and believe that the Imam behind it is quite sincere in his intentions (which have been demonstrated for years). It would, in fact, be one of the biggest defeats for the radical nutjobs who were behind the terrorist attack in the first place. It demonstrates in spades that we are a stronger people than the coward-idiots who pursue their agenda through killing innocents. I think those who have flogged this into an issue are doing it to create a wedge issue for the upcoming election by bringing out the Islamophobia and knee-jerk xenophobia of their mindless followers.


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Originally Posted by issodhos
Originally Posted by Scoutgal
No, it doesn't rest purely on property rights. It should, but when there are people claiming that it is offensive and asking what can be done to prevent this mosque from being built, then first amendment comes into it. That was not decided by President Obama. It was decided with those that find the mosque offensive. President Obama merely answered those inquiries, using the Constitution to explain why what these protesters wanted was not legally possible.
Then you are basically saying that "we" are not a "nation of laws", in which case, there is no real foundation for folks prattling on about a First Amendment right to religious freedom because the result will not be based on law. When the dust has settled, the decision concerning this structure will be determined politically.
Yours,
Issodhos

No, I am not saying that. But some people don't realize, or want to realize that we are a nation of laws and that the laws are to apply to everyone equally. So that is why explanations are needed, and why sometimes we have to go to court for a judgment on where and how the laws are applied.


milk and Girl Scout cookies ;-)

Save your breath-You may need it to blow up your date.




Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Originally Posted by Scoutgal
But some people don't realize, or want to realize that we are a nation of laws and that the laws are to apply to everyone equally. So that is why explanations are needed, and why sometimes we have to go to court for a judgment on where and how the laws are applied.
Amen, Sister! It amazes me that the same people who so stridently urge the court to vigorously police infringements of the Second Amendment will, before they have run out of breath, howl about enforcement of the First.


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,626
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,626
first we need to defend the future for good, clean livin' white 'mericans then we can worry 'bout all them foreigners and ungodly types comin' in and takin' over this promised land.


sure, you can talk to god, but if you don't listen then what's the use? so, onward through the fog!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Originally Posted by california rick
Remember when the rebuild of the WTC was supposed to look like this?

[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]

...the rebuild should have been designed this way - the 'Freedom Tower' is for the boids.
offtopic
Is that a giant "finger"?


Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,626
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,626
you had to ask?


sure, you can talk to god, but if you don't listen then what's the use? so, onward through the fog!
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,431
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,431
Likes: 373
Originally Posted by california rick
Remember when the rebuild of the WTC was supposed to look like this?

[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]
...the rebuild should have been designed this way - the 'Freedom Tower' is for the boids.
Originally Posted by Phil Hoskins
offtopic

Is that a giant "finger"?
A sagacious Ranter amongst us. smile Quite fitting, I believe, given the mosque two blocks away. Kind of a Yin-Yang thing going on... Bow


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,431
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,431
Likes: 373
offtopic

'The Tower' is no longer called the 'Freedom Tower' (thank gawd), the Tower is now simply called One World Trade Center. Framing is set to be completed at the end of 2011, and open for bu$ne$$ in June 2013.

Bow


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Page 4 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 16 17

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5