WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
2024 Election Forum
by jgw - 03/16/25 06:23 PM
Trump 2.0
by rporter314 - 03/16/25 05:10 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 11 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,261,140 my own book page
5,051,299 We shall overcome
4,251,062 Campaign 2016
3,856,704 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,897 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,431
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,551
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 15 of 17 1 2 13 14 15 16 17
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,740
Likes: 1
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,740
Likes: 1
Quote
The demonstrators want to get around the Constitution by creating a sacred geography of sentiment that is outside ordinary legal reality. It consists of a space of white American Judeo-Christian victimhood and of another realm, of a brown, foreign, hostile Islam that must be excluded from lower Manhattan (never mind that these characterizations of American Muslims are pure falsehood). It is an attempt to create a space within which one religious tradition is favored over another, and an attempt to deny members of a religion the opportunity to practice it wherever they like. They grant the technical ‘right’ to the Muslims to worship there, but then seek to withdraw that right on the ground of hurt feelings or inappropriate geography. We saw this sort of thinking in the Jim Crow era, when African Americans, though full American citizens, were prevented from living, shopping, working, and inevitably from worshiping, in certain geographical areas, on the grounds that their doing so would offend and hurt the feelings of the White majority.


Juan Cole


"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
(Philip K.Dick)

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
C
old hand
Offline
old hand
C
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,723
what Issy is arguing is technically true, i.e., there has been no violation of equal protection by any governmental agency. He then says "case closed."

Well, the case isn't closed. The Equal Protection Clause (XIV) which incorporates both the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses (First Amendment) against state and local governments is more than just a legal principle which has no meaning outside a courtroom. That principle embodies an ideal which must be part of the discussion regardless of whether or not someone's rights have actually been violated.

The protesters are obviously demanding something. Whatever that "something" is, I'm sure they would be very happy if local government stepped in and prohibited the building of the Park 51 community center. They certainly have every right to make such a demand. But as long as such demands are being made, either expressly or implicitly (or by threat of mob violence), those of us who understand the concepts and ideals embodied in the First and Fourteenth Amendments will continue to argue that any such governmental action is prohibited by the USCON.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Quote
"As to the reasons given for building it, I have to say I think it is a load of bull chit,
So what are the reasons for building it? My understanding was that the current churches are overcrowded and in need of a larger building to serve a growing congregation. You say:
Quote
"if the goal of the group behind building the place was for bringing divergent peoples together (Hah!) then they would not be building it within two blocks of a location that stirs great emotion in New Yorkers."
Is that their stated goal?
In one breath you grant that they have the right to build the church and yet in another demonize them for doing so. There are lots of Mosques in New York City, lots of Muslims. New York Muslims, surely, were just as shocked and traumatized when the Saudi Nationals attacked their city. The attack wasn't against white skinned Christian Republicans. The attack wasn't committed by brown skinned people against white skinned people, The attack was comitted by a group from one nation against another nation. To demonize them for their religion or skin color is looking past the real reason for the attack: American Government meddling in the middle east.
New York City Mosques
[Linked Image from i399.photobucket.com]
The attack was for political reasons, as are all acts of warfare. Are Japanese forbidden from building near Pearl Harbour? Are Americans forbidden from building in Nagasaki? Germans in London?
Are white people forbidden from building near the site of the Oklahoma Bombing? Where are the protestors? Where is the sensitivity?
Or is the protest only for political gain and no more worthy of respect than the original attack.


Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Originally Posted by Chuck Howard
what Issy is arguing is technically true, i.e., there has been no violation of equal protection by any governmental agency. He then says "case closed."

As I understand it, the developer wants to build, and there is no known zoning problem. So at this point, the only way to stop the project would be if citizen pressure on government authorities would cause them to act to stop the project due to "sensitivity" concerns.

And IF that were to happen... that would be the proximate governmental action which is cause for concern.... IE existing laws being circumvented in a discriminatory manner


"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
I
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
Originally Posted by Greger
In one breath you grant that they have the right to build the church and yet in another demonize them for doing so.
Don't be silly, Greger. Not believing the claimed motive of a person or group does not equate to me demonizing them.;-)
Yours,
Issodhos


"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
I
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
Originally Posted by Schlack
to say its a provate property issue is to ignore the context and history, but sure when should all that interfere with the divine rite of property?
You still do not get it do you, Schlack. Because it is a right of private property, the owners have a rock solid basis for building their center. They need not ask anyone's permission. You seem to think it belongs in a democratic tug-o-war with victory going to the loudest, the strongest, or the most persuasive in debate and political intrigue. Granted, the concepts of liberty and natural rights are a foreign concept to many the world over, but surely a few among the many living in darkness can at least see its shadow upon the cave's wall?:-)
Yours,
Issodhos

Last edited by issodhos; 08/26/10 02:19 AM. Reason: spelling

"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Actually issodhos, it is you who does not get it.


Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Originally Posted by issodhos
Originally Posted by Greger
In one breath you grant that they have the right to build the church and yet in another demonize them for doing so.
Don't be silly, Greger. Not believing the claimed motive of a person or group does not equate to me demonizing them.;-)
Yours,
Issodhos

So what is their claimed motive? You claimed a motive for them but as I said, it appears to be nothing more than needing a larger facility. I'm sorry if you didn't like the word I chose but, despite your obvious support for their right to build it, you certainly give the impression that you don't approve.


Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Originally Posted by Greger
Originally Posted by issodhos
Originally Posted by Greger
In one breath you grant that they have the right to build the church and yet in another demonize them for doing so.
Don't be silly, Greger. Not believing the claimed motive of a person or group does not equate to me demonizing them.;-)
Yours,
Issodhos

So what is their claimed motive? You claimed a motive for them but as I said, it appears to be nothing more than needing a larger facility. I'm sorry if you didn't like the word I chose but, despite your obvious support for their right to build it, you certainly give the impression that you don't approve.

ANd Beyond that, other thant the fact that it ia impossible to know what their motive is.... and the fact that mabe they may have several motives.... and maybe different people in their group have different motives....

other than all that... what the heck difference does it make what is their motive.... if they have rights to the land... legally, and their is no zoning issue after that, who among us has the right and responsibility to speculate upon their motives and suggest that as a reason why they should not be able to do what they appear to be entitled to do?

Why is this discussion even necessary?


"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,740
Likes: 1
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,740
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by issodhos
Originally Posted by Schlack
to say its a provate property issue is to ignore the context and history, but sure when should all that interfere with the divine rite of property?
You still do not get it do you, Schlack. Because it is a right of private property, the owners have a rock solid basis for building their center. They need not ask anyone's permission. You seem to think it belongs in a democratic tug-o-war with victory going to the loudest, the strongest, or the most persuasive in debate and political intrigue. Granted, the concepts of liberty and natural rights are a foreign concept to many the world over, but surely a few among the many living in darkness can at least see its shadow upon the cave's wall?:-)
Yours,
Issodhos

Ahhh I see now, I am wrong because reality doesn't measure up to your ideal.

nuff said



"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
(Philip K.Dick)

Page 15 of 17 1 2 13 14 15 16 17

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5