|
0 members (),
13
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,539
Members6,305
| |
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
OP
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
The complaint offered ( regarding my action of choosing to read and comment on the executive summary, first, before reading the entirety, exhaustively ), is so weak that it hardly needs to be addressed.
It's already had more attention than it warranted. Are you saying that it is acceptable practice to comment on scientific reports based upon a few words that caught your attention? It could be. You're so imprecise that it's impossible to give any good answer even were your question to be cleaned up...if it were not a loaded one. e.g. in need of cleanup: your use of "acceptable practice". Where? By whom? For what purpose? Why is it that you are not using my words directly ? No need to paraphrase for me ! ...on scientific reports based upon a few words that caught your attention Those words caught your attention because of your prejudice. so you claim - again providing nothing to substantiate the claim I give up!!  (For the record, I think you are a "closet" Dimissive belief type)
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293
newbie
|
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293 |
The complaint offered ( regarding my action of choosing to read and comment on the executive summary, first, before reading the entirety, exhaustively ), is so weak that it hardly needs to be addressed.
It's already had more attention than it warranted. Are you saying that it is acceptable practice to comment on scientific reports based upon a few words that caught your attention? It could be. You're so imprecise that it's impossible to give any good answer even were your question to be cleaned up...if it were not a loaded one. e.g. in need of cleanup: your use of "acceptable practice". Where? By whom? For what purpose? Why is it that you are not using my words directly ? No need to paraphrase for me ! ...on scientific reports based upon a few words that caught your attention Those words caught your attention because of your prejudice. so you claim - again providing nothing to substantiate the claim I give up!! Yes, that's a good move. You were up to no good, anyway.
Last edited by Perfect Fit; 07/12/11 11:25 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
|
OP
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
Yes, that's a good move. You were up to no good, anyway. That's debatable (but not with you!  )
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293
newbie
|
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293 |
as you say, I am humble - but I'm not downcast.
Last edited by Perfect Fit; 07/12/11 11:45 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
|
OP
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
as you say, I am humble - but I'm not downcast. Whaaaat? Never mind. 
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293
newbie
|
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293 |
I think you are a "closet" Dimissive belief type) Why must I always explain ? It's the stuff you write. It's about a little self-awareness.
Last edited by Perfect Fit; 07/13/11 01:03 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
|
OP
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
I think you are a "closet" Dimissive belief type) Why must I always explain ? It's the stuff you write. It's about a little self-awareness. Why do you never explain? It's the stuff you write. It's about whaaaaat?? Forget the attempts at manipulation and evasion and disingenuity. Just say what you want us to hear. Plain. Direct. Concise. Be brave. Then we can discuss.
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293
newbie
|
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293 |
Well, you could have meant either "dismissive", or "demissive".
No need to become nasty. It's the stuffs you write.
It's not like I'm writing those mangled stuffs that you pop up with.
Last edited by Perfect Fit; 07/13/11 01:30 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
|
OP
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
Still haven't read the report that is the subject of the thread, have you?
Why do you post?
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293
newbie
|
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 293 |
Still haven't read the report that is the subject of the thread, have you?
Why do you post? Because I noticed something in the executive summary as I read. I thought we had gone over that already. And you? You've gone over it exhaustively, of course ?
Last edited by Perfect Fit; 07/13/11 01:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
