Originally Posted by Perfect Fit
Originally Posted by Ardy
If there was anything worthwhile in the original post, it might be interesting to go back there and try to start discussing that.

.... just a thought
Hi Ardy. Resistance from the gang. It's easier to just keep on making things up faster and faster, it seems.

With respect to the poll questions

1/
Quote
How much do you agree or disagree with the following
statement? "I could easily change my mind about global
warming."

Any comments on what kind of thoughts might be stimulated, for instance, on the question's contextual meaning; the question as it could be taken wrt the readers' internal state ?

I think one could be tempted to assume that answering to the negative, is an indicator of some negative intellectual or ethical characteristic, or quality, to many "progressive" thinkers.
It's being "inflexible", "dogmatic", "not willing to look at contrary evidence" etc.
kinda stuck in rut, ain't ya.

sure, you can talk to god, but if you don't listen then what's the use? so, onward through the fog!