WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by Irked - 03/17/25 12:09 PM
2024 Election Forum
by jgw - 03/16/25 10:58 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 14 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,261,156 my own book page
5,051,309 We shall overcome
4,251,105 Campaign 2016
3,856,731 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,922 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,431
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,556
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 7 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Quote
The days of super cheap and readily available liquid fuel are coming to a gradual close.
It's all uphill from here, so ALL vehicles HAVE to become more efficient. There's no way around it.

Bingo.

Even if you aren't a Mechanic this should be fairly obvious.

1959 is gone. And it aint comin' back.



Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
'
Originally Posted by Greger
1959 is gone. And it aint comin' back.
And good riddance.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 254
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 254
I am not saying that the current raft of regulations is going to be perfect either. But I am also saying that the answer is to remove the lobby influence from the government regulatory agencies.
As long as we have lobbyists going through a revolving door from lobby office to govt agencies, and back and forth, NO government agency will be able to function properly, no government agency is going to write fair and honest legislation and no government agency is going to do anything but protect the people who are supplying its staffing.

It's real convenient to blame all of this on liberal and on Obama, but Obama and his liberal America haters didn't put the foxes in the henhouses.

You might want to look at the ATA, it's associated lobbies, and Big Oil first, and see if perhaps they might have wielded some undue influence.

It's not JUST the Securities Exchance Commission, it's ALL of the agencies now...regulatory capture is across the board, and it did NOT START WITH OBAMA.


"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Quote
it did NOT START WITH OBAMA.
Yer on a roll, Checks.

Interestingly, lobbyists are where our politicians get most of their information these days. They usually get to hear both sides from opposing lobbyists.
Republicans would like to believe that everything was okay when the government was run by Republicans. But it just aint so. Conservatism has generally proven itself to be a failure.
Liberalism, of course, is also a failure, but its failures are usually less painful.
Balance is the key.
And, as this thread has addressed, coping with change.


Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 802
M
journeyman
OP Offline
journeyman
M
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 802
Originally Posted by Greger
Quote
Water - regardless of where in America you're at - is a vital issue.
Yes it is. and there really isn't enough og it in south Texas to fill hundreds of miles of ridiculous 19th century style brick lined aquaducts for the porpose of transporting frieght at 4MPH. Nor is there enough of it in any of the desert regions. Water also has a tendency to freeze in the winter, and the Great plains run uphill a mile between the Mississippi and Denver. Water don't run uphill y'know. Then it's another mile up to get across the Rockies. Your Barge Canal theory is as dumbassed a scheme as I ever heard of.
There's still plenty of Railroad tracks and right of ways that can easily be upgraded for high speed rail, both for freight and passenger service. The day will come when your gas guzzler will be too expensive to drive around. Maybe not in your lifetime, maybe not even in mine. But that day is coming. Truckers and lone commuters in 10mpg pickemup trucks will be a thing of the distant past. Digging barge canals to fill with precious fresh water is not going to be an option either. rolleyes


All of which goes to prove you're far more "ideological" than I, Greger ! OTOH, even I do know how canal boats can go "uphill" even as water flows down. But let's hear your engineering precis on how to build "200 mph freight roads", by all means ! Or your political one on how to create freight spurs in urban areas economically !

"High-speed passenger rail" - where you go sixty + mph until the next station 10 miles down the track - stop and a couple of dozen depart/ board while hundreds wait. A couple of hundred people stopping/starting in order to board/discharge a dozen ! (Yeah that's "efficiency "!)

OTOH we could create a system of elevated "interurban cars/carriage systems" using the the median/sides of extant highways providing efficient point-to-point transport in, say, 12-15 passenger packets moving at 40-50 mph. Developed like a tree, systems would use standardized "cars" operating solely on remote control and shunting from the "main line" in order to discharge/pickup passengers to be met by "locals" of the same ilk.

Not too long back the local paper published an old account of two individuals traveling from Easton, PA to Ohio and returning in a couple of days on a similar, terrestrial system. Now all you have to do is claim our grandfathers could do something we can't !

The lack of the foregoing is ONE of the reasons we have folks commuting sixty+ miles in "pickemup" trucks. The other is government interference. Until government stepped in, the "sine qua non" of the suburban set was the station wagon. It was built on a car chassis.
EPA CAFE regs killed them. But didn't "kill the need" . Hence the emergence of the SUV. (Which, BTW, weren't subject to "car safety regs" so mfgs, happily embraced the SUV and loaded it up with all sorts of "gee whiz" features attractive to the suburban set. Never mind the CG and ride height meant truck handling and "enthusiastic driving" meant dead bodies. The consumer - and most importantly government was "happy" !

America is awash in energy ! We've got trillions of units of NG in proven fields. Like wise billions of barrels of oil in proven fields. But there is one "holdup:". The Obama Administration ! Its halted development of inshore, shallow water development in the Gulf, blocked terrestrial development of the Baakken Field in the midwest and done everything but declare martial law to slow development of Marcellus Shale ! One must wonder what the "objective" of the Obama Administration is, since its "estimates" of the efficiency and impact of its touted "green alternative energy" schemes aren't proving out in reality and killing a lot of wildlife along the way.

But not of this is going to help the plight of the OO trucker ! It appears he's going to get slammed on his punkin with yet another in a long litany of federal mandates favoring the unions and the ATA. And, as usual, the consummer will have to pay.... >Mech

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 802
M
journeyman
OP Offline
journeyman
M
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 802
Greger,

Spoken like
Originally Posted by Greger
BTW OTROO R ADB. IMNSHO.
By the way, over the road owner operators are a dying breed.
In my not so humble opinion.
Back when Diamond T, REO, Mack Trucks and White Freightliners were the main trucks on the road and Mack introduced the more efficient more powerful Maxodyne diesel engine, trucks were workhorses, not horribly expensive, not horribly luxurious. But truckers demanded more. Not just a sleeper in back of the cab, but a luxury apartment. They needed more speed, more power, MORE CHROME. Single axles couldn't pull the newer larger loads so everything became tandem. Trailers were extended a few feet at a time form 40 to 53 feet in length. Truckers needed more power. They asked for it and they got it. Fuel was cheap and speed was easy to come by. They got everything they asked for, including the price tag.
Old truckers never die. They just get a new Peterbilt.


Spoken like someone that's never driven any of them - particularly the "maxodyne" ! "Singles" can pull as much freight as any other design, but DOT weight regs demand "axles/ton". I see you've never seen those multi-axle trailers so prevalent in the northern midwest.

No OTR "sleeper cab" truck is what anyone, (outside a tribe of Packis) would term, "luxurious". More like a mobile (and very tiny ) motel room sans the shower !

None of this "Government Imposed Mandate" is about energy or its "efficient use" IMO. Our trucking industry is already on the peak of the energy/cost curve. The Obama Administration - and the ATA/Teamsters, etc are using the power of regulation to "reshape the curve" - to their advantage. IOW a political ploy to erase yet another "restricting factor" in government control of our economy.

The United States is awash in energy ! Or at least it would be but for the blockading rulings and actions by the sitting administration. Developement of vast fields of gas and oil are being blocked at every turn by every legislative arrow in the quivers of the watermelons regardless of the "science" of its safety ! Why would the President of the most powerful economic machine in the history of the world work so damn hard to starve it of its lifeblood ? >Mech

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Quote
The United States is awash in energy !
Yes, of course it is. Drill, baby drill. rolleyes
The one good thing about having Texas oil executives in the whitehouse was the way they drove down the price of oil.
Fuel prices have soared since Democrats stole the last elections.

What the United States is awash in is idiocy.

No, I'm not a truck driver. Yes I've driven a few Mack trucks and worked on them as a youngster. It wasn't my cup of TEA thank you. My dear old Pa was a mechanic and a truckdriver when I was just a tyke. Fortunately by the time I grew up he had gotten a real job.
[Linked Image from remarkablecars.com]
In a perfect world I'd be drivin' this!


Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Quote
even I do know how canal boats can go "uphill" even as water flows down. But let's hear your engineering precis on how to build "200 mph freight roads", by all means ! Or your political one on how to create freight spurs in urban areas economically !

I think you may have miised the part where I said trucks are perfect for local deliveries.

Yes, all the water in your intergalactic canal system can be pumped up or down as required. I think we all have a handle on that technology. And yes, I've seen barges being pushed up the Missisippi and the thousands of horsepower required to slowly push it up the hill. But as far as trains go we have only to look as far as Europe for the High Speed Rail technology. No, it doesn't stop at every whistle stop anymore than airplanes land in every hick town. But do please write your congressman to see if you can get that barge canal started. Just point to examples of it efficiently used elsewhere in the world.

High Speed rail, unlike your Automated Interstate Barge Canals, are already in the planning stages, this is what the future looks like:
[Linked Image from crooksandliars.com]


Last edited by Greger; 08/24/11 02:56 PM.

Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,853
'
Originally Posted by Greger
The one good thing about having Texas oil executives in the whitehouse was the way they drove down the price of oil.
Fuel prices have soared since Democrats stole the last elections.
I do like twisted humor, Greger, but this does push the envelope !

· · · wink

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 254
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 254
Originally Posted by Mechanic
The lack of the foregoing is ONE of the reasons we have folks commuting sixty+ miles in "pickemup" trucks. The other is government interference. Until government stepped in, the "sine qua non" of the suburban set was the station wagon. It was built on a car chassis.
EPA CAFE regs killed them. But didn't "kill the need" .


OMG this is almost sickening enough to make me puke.
Come on Mech, why is it that you only see the ONE side of everything? The station wagon could have been saved numerous ways, and I know this because there are two surviving examples, no THREE I just thought of a third, and it's a domestic one!

1) They could have done what Mercedes did, develop a reliable DIESEL version, which would have gotten 40 to 50% better fuel economy. No-o-o-o-o-o! Instead they insisted that station wagons had to have 460 cubic inch four barrel gassers and they wouldn't even stop bitching long enough to try fuel injection.

Jesus Christ on a bike Mechie, the station wagon died at a time when the US auto industry was so damn cynical that the only company with the guts to try an alternative design was forced to use a Renault engine...and we got AMC PACERS as a result.
The Ford Fairmont could have succeeded if they would have been willing to try an up-engineered version of the 2.8 liter Ford V-6 instead of the 250 or 300 cubic inch straight six, which they refused to outfit with fuel injection ONCE AGAIN.

Bullcrap, I call bullcrap.

2) Yeah I am on a roll! The next surviving example comes from SWEDEN, the Volvo wagon. They're everything the American wagons weren't, safer, better looking, roomier, more powerful but still efficient, because the Swedes, those damn socialist bastards, they engineered the crap out of em.

3) FINALLY today you can now get a decent station wagon again, and the best of them costs a pretty penny but it's powerful, good looking and it's efficient. The Cadillac CTS wagon.
It'll smoke a lot of the sports coupes and still get 25 mpg on the freeway.

And what we now call "sport touring" is a station wagon my friend. The Chevy Traverse, the Dodge Magnum, the Caliber and Nitro all fit the station wagon category.

And still no diesels. And please, don't even try to tell me it's because our smog regs are too tough. They're tough but it just requires something our automakers refuse to do, DOMESTIC research and development.

Originally Posted by Mechanic
Hence the emergence of the SUV. (Which, BTW, weren't subject to "car safety regs" so mfgs, happily embraced the SUV and loaded it up with all sorts of "gee whiz" features attractive to the suburban set. Never mind the CG and ride height meant truck handling and "enthusiastic driving" meant dead bodies. The consumer - and most importantly government was "happy" !

Yeah okay whatever, not like Republicans don't have a aching desire for a large surrogate penis on wheels. That's what killed the station wagon, it's a Mom car while an SUV is compensation for..... LOL

Originally Posted by Mechanic
America is awash in energy ! We've got trillions of units of NG in proven fields.

Oh yeah sure.
USGS slashes Marcellus Shale estimate 80%

The USGS are the factual end, the party poopers.
I am so used to hearing rosy projections...we're AWASH IN ENERGY, so much it will too cheap to meter!
Remember that projection? Yeah sure Mech, we can just hook up a port in every garage and charge a flat rate. Too cheap to meter!

I'm waiting for the next downgrade, first it was 410 trillion cubic feet, now 84 trillion, next they'll say 21 trillion.
And most of it will be on a slow boat to CHINA!
You like for us to forget that there is NO requirement that these benevolent bastards sell all that energy to US. They can sell it to anyone they want.

So like I said, the era of CHEAP AND READILY available fossil fuel IS OVER Mech. You can have cheap, but it will mean long lines and reduced availability, you can have readily available but it will mean expensive. You can have one or the other but not both.

Originally Posted by Mechanic
Like wise billions of barrels of oil in proven fields. But there is one "holdup:". The Obama Administration ! Its halted development of inshore, shallow water development in the Gulf,

When they stop destroying those shallow waters we'll talk.
They seem to have a distinct disregard for that sort of thing.

Originally Posted by Mechanic
blocked terrestrial development of the Baakken Field in the midwest

I would LOVE to engage you in a discussion of the costs involved in shale oil development, but I am waiting for oil to once again top 150 bucks a barrel. Once it does, and it has staying power at 150 for oh...say at least a decade, that discussion will not be necessary and whatever obstacles are currently present will be worked out, because at 150 a barrel it will make more sense to approach shale oil development than not to, and then the only problem will be whether or not the principal players want to pay attention to environmental quality or go in like usual rapers and pillagers they've proven to be.

Over my dead f**ing body, and I am not alone.
Notice how they suddenly came up with a new frack water formula the other day, one which isn't quite as toxic?
Know why? I think you do know why.

Originally Posted by Mechanic
and done everything but declare martial law to slow development of Marcellus Shale ! One must wonder what the "objective" of the Obama Administration is, since its "estimates" of the efficiency and impact of its touted "green alternative energy" schemes aren't proving out in reality and killing a lot of wildlife along the way.

violin Spare me, please.
Republicans have BLOCKED almost EVERY SINGLE effort to develop alternative energy proposed since 2008 unless it benefitted China.

Originally Posted by Mechanic
But not of this is going to help the plight of the OO trucker ! It appears he's going to get slammed on his punkin with yet another in a long litany of federal mandates favoring the unions and the ATA. And, as usual, the consummer will have to pay.... >Mech

And as usual, the consumer has to pay when the magical "invisible hand of the market" is allowed to work too, so what the hell is the difference, please tell me!


"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com
Page 7 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5