Rights of Animals?
Could it be that male humans look at animals with different brain functions than women do? Men, being mainly hunters see our forest animals as feed for the family. Women see animals as family units much in the same way as they see their own families. Could it be that man has the capacity to find association with young animals who are helpless and need a little TLC from humans? We women do it all the time.
Our children find a puppy or kitten or even a bird’s nest that has fallen from a tree and brought them home. Is it not a desire to help a helpless critter? Is this not a good action to expand the child’s love for nature?
I have a keen respect for Murray Rothbard but a deeper respect for the human mind which is unique in all respects if allowed to develop individuality. There is no set model for the human brain and our strength at being top of the food ladder can be found in our individual look at the animal world as well as how we treat our planet.
Even our indigenous American natives understood the care of the soil they used to grow their grains and fruits by staggering their plants not to deplete the nutrients and probably learned too late to stop slaughtering the bison that fed and clothed them.
The human brain has learned the art of balancing what they seem to enjoy and that is showing the power of men over the animals, especially when holding the power of a gun in their hands. The female brain sees a different point of view and we tend to find this action offensive. But human nature is just that. Maybe the balance of male and female points of view are necessary for the survival of the animal world and mankind.
