WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by Irked - 03/14/25 10:00 AM
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/11/25 11:16 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 16 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,260,915 my own book page
5,051,279 We shall overcome
4,250,718 Campaign 2016
3,856,322 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,489 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,430
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,539
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
Buzzard's Roost, Troyota
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,643
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,643
Surely the Senator from Texas can come up with a better reason for voting down a campaign fund transparency bill.

Quote
Washington, DC - Today, U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) issued this statement following her vote on the DISCLOSE Act:

"The Senate has now voted on this measure three times," said Sen. Hutchison. "With 23 million Americans struggling for work and unemployment over 8 percent for 41 straight months, we should be focused on job creation and boosting our weak economy."
More Bullsh!t from the Great Insane State of Texas!

Could disclosure be used as a political tool to damage opposing political opponents or to undermine the political process?

As you all probably are aware, the Senate Republicans voted down the Disclose Act yesterday...and I think again today, which is supposedly a "new campaign transparency law". A second vote was cast because of some technicality. ????? Was it or is it really a bill that would truly mandate exposing contributors?

But according to Sen. McConnell...

Originally Posted by [color:#330000
[b]Suppression of Speech and Harassment if Donors Disclosed - Huff Post[/color][/b]]The bill was not expected to beat back the Republican filibuster, which was led by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). McConnell, called the "Darth Vader of campaign finance reform" in the past, recently made news by giving a series of speeches declaring that campaign finance disclosure amounted to nothing short of harassment and a suppression of speech.

In light of the Citizen's United case - according to the Conservative Justices in the Supreme Court - McConnell could be declared right on his position and apparently other Republican membersin the Senate...and probably those in the House.

Gosh! Maybe I'm being Unamerican because I believe that transparency in government is a good thing. Now, admittedly, I've never witnessed transparency in government during my lifetime. But, hey...who knows?

American politics is pretty much a mirror copy of the America's civil court system (and in some cases criminal court). You know...whoever has the most money and lies the best - WINS!


Turn on ANY brand of political machine - and it automatically goes to the "SPIN and LIE CYCLE" wink

Yours Truly - Gregg


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 2
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 2
In a Free country of Free Individuals, no one would have the right to know anything about an Individual's Property and how he chooses to use it, administer it, profit from it or buy with it. Only through privacy can each Individual participate in a Free Market without the threat of attack from the Envious Mob.


How eager they are to be slaves - Tiberius Caesar

Coulda tripped out easy, but I've changed my ways - Donovan
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Interesting that three votes on the Disclose bill are too many but 33 on repealing ACA are not.

Ahhh, Republican math, it is such a fluid subject.


Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Quote
"The Senate has now voted on this measure three times," said Sen. Hutchison. "With 23 million Americans struggling for work and unemployment over 8 percent for 41 straight months, we should be focused on job creation and boosting our weak economy."

Maybe KBH should be saying that to Republicans that keep trying to repeal the AHCA.


milk and Girl Scout cookies ;-)

Save your breath-You may need it to blow up your date.




Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,082
Likes: 134
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,082
Likes: 134
i think kbh is simply re-iterating the democratic mantra of work on jobs. Note in her tweet she did not comment on the bill itself as mcconell did.



ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
America can survive bad policy, but not destruction of our Democratic institutions



Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,082
Likes: 134
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,082
Likes: 134
Quote
threat of attack from the Envious Mob
lol ... lol

yeah i had to laugh as i tried to envision an envious mob ...


ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
America can survive bad policy, but not destruction of our Democratic institutions



Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,082
Likes: 134
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,082
Likes: 134
i think i referred to this in previous post ... after just a few votes dems asked about jobs (and of course continued) ... only after 3 did she comment ... it is obvious both are correct





ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
America can survive bad policy, but not destruction of our Democratic institutions



Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,026
Likes: 98
J
jgw Online Content
old hand
Online Content
old hand
J
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,026
Likes: 98
Weird, I would remind that, when the dems had the majority, they also failed to pass disclosure - same with the senate filibuster rule.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 2
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by rporter314
Quote
threat of attack from the Envious Mob
lol ... lol

yeah i had to laugh as i tried to envision an envious mob ...

Hmm. It's my experience that all mobs are envious.


How eager they are to be slaves - Tiberius Caesar

Coulda tripped out easy, but I've changed my ways - Donovan
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,082
Likes: 134
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,082
Likes: 134
having a majority does not imply any bill would pass

once the minority blocks business cloture is required and with the close difference in the number of the majority, debate may never end, thus requiring the nuclear option or reconciliation

i believe in modern times that the speaker of the senate prefers to conduct business rather than tie the calender up with nonsense

ergo neither could get past senate

i can only think reid thought he had enough votes to pass it or it was a "political" effort, simply portraying the republican/conservatives as the evil ones


ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
America can survive bad policy, but not destruction of our Democratic institutions




Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5