0 members (),
7
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,129
Posts314,628
Members6,305
|
Most Online294 Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581 |
I have been doing some reading on the Founding Fathers, and have reluctantly concluded that their original intent was for America to grow into a fundamentalist theocracy propped up by a kleptocratic war profiteering police state that would eventually remove all civil liberties from non-wealthy Americans on the premise of fighting a never ending war on a transitive adverb. I see. So, in arriving at this conclusion you felt a need to join a party that would help pave the way to such an outcome? Cool.;-) Yours, Issodhos
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581 |
for those of us who are going to cast a principled vote for a candidate of a minor party whom we judge to be worthy of occupying the office of the presidency Perhaps I've missed something along the way but just who are these minor party candidates you and others deem worthy of occupying the white house? Perhaps I was not as clear as I should have been Greger. When I wrote, and this is the complete clause, "but for those of us who may not be willing to enfranchise either major party's candidate with the temporary authority to wield power as a result of our vote, or for those of us who are going to cast a principled vote for a candidate of a minor party whom we judge to be worthy of occupying the office of the presidency, expect us to exercise our Right to be critical of both the utterly corrupt Democratic and the utterly corrupt Republican parties, if for no other reason than it being entertainment of a sort in an otherwise dismal decade.", I was refering to those of us who would be either not voting at all, or would be voting for a minor party candidate. I did not mean to indicate that I had a third party candidate in mind this go-around. If Ron Paul were to get the Repub nomination (and live to see the next day) I would quite happily vote for him. Other than that, and once again for the record, there are, in my opinion, three principled actions a Citizen can take on election day 1. One can vote party-line for a Party that adhers to its stated principles and character. 2. One can vote for an individual candidate who represents the character and principles one thinks are most supportive of one's vision of what America is -- or should be. 3. One can exercise one's responsibility as a citizen and refuse to enfranchise any current candidate with the temporary priviledge of exercising power with one's consent if all are unprincipled and unworthy candidates -- assuming one thinks that legitimate power originates with the individual citizen. And please note, in refusing to vote for a supposedly lesser evil in opposition to a supposedly greater evil, one does not forfeit one's right to be critical of the one that eventual ascends to the throne. This is usually referred to by those who wish to energize their party base as "throwing your vote away", telling you each time that "this election is too important to allow principle to stand in the way -- we'll make it up to you next time. Be patient". How many voters still think they they will eventually catch up to that Democratic/Republican carrot?:-) Yours, Issodhos
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,235
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,235 |
When I hear some people claim to be of the Superior Non-Partisan Variety, snootily denigrating those who are foolish enough to see a difference between the Dominant Political Parties, I wonder if they think we are stupid enough to believe they don't go into the booth and pull the lever that we can plainly discern from their pattern of discussion favors one or the other Party.
Issodhos, for instance, has never voted for a Democrat.
Phil has never voted Republican, and if he ever did, probably felt dirty about it afterwards.
"I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct." J. Coleman (Founder of the Weather Channel poo-poos Globwarm)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator Bionic Scribe
|
Administrator Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134 |
Actually Fermi, I was a avid Republican up to my college days. I was even a delegate to a young Republican Convention and assumed the role in proxy of Henry Cabot Lodge and spoke passionately before the convention of the evils of Social Security.
Soon thereafter I became a passionate Democrat, arguing for the expansion of programs that I felt would bring equality of opportunity.
That was then and this is now. I have voted too many times for Democrats hoping they would some day live up to my dreams for America. I would still vote ofr someone of either party who speaks openly and passionately about our REAL problems and proposes what I see as possible solutions.
I was very much disappointed by the performance of Pres. Clinton and his wife seems to be even worse, to me. I am leaning towards Dennis Kucinich as the closest in principle and John Edwards as the closest and also maybe electable.
It is true, I have not voted for a Republican since 1960, but that has over the years led me to vote multiple times for someone of neither party.
For all their faults, I am fortunate to have as my Senator Barbara Boxer and Representative henry Waxman. I like at least 80% of their positions. That they are Democrats is irrelevant however.
I do not claim to be non-partisan to show how superior I am, but I now believe any contribution to the divisions in this country fostered by both parties is a mistake.
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,235
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,235 |
Phil, up until this very moment, I had never felt judgemental toward any of your lifestyle choices.
I should have been able to recognize that young Republican in the picture, I guess.
"I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct." J. Coleman (Founder of the Weather Channel poo-poos Globwarm)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator Bionic Scribe
|
Administrator Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134 |
LOL, oh the more you know the more the aversions, believe me.
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,646
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,646 |
I also would expect Democrats to stop demanding that others provide them with a "plan" and, if it pleases them to do so, to instead come up with one themselves H Res 1234. Go Dennis!
Steve Give us the wisdom to teach our children to love, to respect and be kind to one another, so that we may grow with peace in mind. (Native American prayer)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,581 |
... I wonder if they think we are stupid enough to believe they don't go into the booth and pull the lever that we can plainly discern from their pattern of discussion favors one or the other Party. Not a judgement for me to make, Fermi.:-) Besides, you are incorrect -- and apparently a poor fisherman, as well.;-) Yours, Issodhos
"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,235
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,235 |
I stand by my assessment.
"I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct." J. Coleman (Founder of the Weather Channel poo-poos Globwarm)
|
|
|
|
|