Cool, I didn't know that it was allowed to do a broadbrush proof (using dated data - bet that could be a new word,
data'd) to support a broadbrush hypothesis.
Guess that's why I'm not in the biz of proving things.

Ah, but you have proved yourself to be...


Some say,
Critical thinking is anti-American...
Are you implying that I am
...anti-American?
Are broad-brush criticisms, supported by broad-brush and shallow information, and defended by uncompleted aspersions, considered to be critical thinking?
Does the truth have a future in America? What does that mean? Or is this just another vague,
noomie-esque scattershot of negative jibber jabber at the U.S.?