Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
Originally Posted by Ezekiel
Almost all military intervention is almost always economically motivated. Ideology is always the "story" used to justify military intervention to the plebe. I see no difference between one perpetrator or the other.
I also don't think you'll find any piece of journalism that is not politically biased.
I do see differences between perpetrators, but in all other respects, I agree.
You are correct.
I should clarify: there are wars that are fought to defend against aggression and there are wars initiated by aggressors.
Intervention, IMO is the latter and not the former.

"The liberals can understand everything but people who don't understand them."
Lenny Bruce

"The cleverest of all, in my opinion, is the man who calls himself a fool at least once a month."
Dostoevsky