WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
3) My argument is that wars are waged with economic motivation, whether they are a rational way to achieve that goal is not the issue. My response was they DO sometimes achieve that goal.
So, a bunch of decision makers sit around a big table and debate whether or not to have a war. The people in favor propose that they could throw massive amounts of money and lives at a project and and there is a possiblility that maybe it could work out to be economically beneficial.
The leader asks what is the probablility of success.
Proponents say... well, sometimes these thing work out well... but we really don't know.
Is that how it works?
Last edited by Ardy; 01/25/1312:06 AM.
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel