|
0 members (),
49
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,536
Members6,305
| |
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707 |
I don't have much of a choice. It's more complicated than it appears. I am just ahead of the curve as to what awaits Americans. It's a brave new world not to the happiness and welfare of the average American.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707
veteran
|
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707 |
[b]Bills Would Mandate Warrant for GPS Tracking[/b]Two bills introduced Thursday in the House and Senate would compel law enforcement agents to obtain a warrant before affixing a GPS tracker to a vehicle, using a cell site simulator to locate someone through their mobile device or obtaining geolocation data from third-party service providers.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707
veteran
|
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707
veteran
|
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,939
old hand
|
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,939 |
So it is OK to use a spotter airplane so long as it has a human in it, but not all right to use a drone?
Joe, have you read the text of this bill? It carves out enough exceptions to make it nothing but a show-the-Florida-Flag to the voters.
And the bit about using the bill to authorize people to file a lawsuit to prevent someone from using a drone? Piffle. Just piffle. You must file a lawsuit AFTER someone has done something. Not to prevent them.
Example:
You are growing "hemp" on your Panhandle property, and you want to prevent flyovers by drones. So you go into court and ask that the authorities be enjoined from flying over your marijuana crop. Let me know how well that works out for you. Not just you: Joe, but anyone.
Take the nacilbupeR pledge: I solemnly swear that I will help back out all Republicans at the next election.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707
veteran
|
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707 |
Ted, are you still arguing that the NDAA doesn't apply to Americans?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,939
old hand
|
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,939 |
Joe, are you next going to bring up yet again your perception that the Federal Reserve is not an agency of the Government? What does the NDAA have to do with a flawed Florida law about drones, anyway?about
Take the nacilbupeR pledge: I solemnly swear that I will help back out all Republicans at the next election.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707
veteran
|
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,939
old hand
|
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,939 |
Thank you for your insightful comment.
Take the nacilbupeR pledge: I solemnly swear that I will help back out all Republicans at the next election.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707
veteran
|
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,707 |
[b]Idaho restricts drone use by police agencies amid privacy concerns[/b] SALMON, Idaho (Reuters) - Idaho's Republican governor signed a law on Thursday that restricts use of drone aircraft by police and other public agencies as the use of pilotless aircraft inside U.S. borders is increasing. The measure aims to protect privacy rights.
In approving the law, which requires law enforcement to obtain warrants to collect evidence using drones in most cases, Idaho becomes the second U.S. state after Virginia to restrict uses of pilotless aircraft over privacy concerns.
|
|
|
|
|
