WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
A question
by jgw - 06/11/24 08:38 PM
Time to Impeach Thomas
by jgw - 06/11/24 05:56 PM
Round Table for Spring 2024
by perotista - 06/10/24 11:53 PM
2024 Election Forum
by perotista - 06/10/24 06:17 PM
Marching in favor of Palestinians
by pdx rick - 06/06/24 05:31 PM
No rubbers for Trump
by NW Ponderer - 06/05/24 09:20 AM
Watching the Supreme Court
by NW Ponderer - 06/05/24 09:15 AM
Yeah, Trump admits he is a pure racist
by pdx rick - 05/14/24 07:28 PM
Trump's base having second thoughts
by pdx rick - 05/14/24 07:25 PM
Who's Online Now
1 members (NW Ponderer), 25 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,171,716 my own book page
5,023,357 We shall overcome
4,205,032 Campaign 2016
3,799,214 Trump's Trumpet
3,020,939 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,300
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
jgw 9
Kaine 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,095
Posts313,909
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
But ya gotta admit it is awfully funny, in a gap-toothed invidious smile kinda way [Linked Image from lh6.googleusercontent.com]

Last edited by Ardy; 04/30/13 02:32 AM.

"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,998
Likes: 187
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Online Sad
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,998
Likes: 187
Originally Posted by logtroll
Originally Posted by issodhos
I think a near consensus is forming, Slipped, that the honorable and socially responsible thing for this citizen to have done would have been to either 1) put his gun away and bear-hug the guy into surrendering, or even better 2) give the knife-wielding fellow his gun and then bear-hug him into surrendering. He would then be looked up more favorably regardless of the outcome. LOL
Like my second ex-wife would say, "That's the kinda boolshit that flops on the floor when ya try ta think!"

Fer the record, nonsensus ain't the same thang as consensus.


Log, I think your response lacks a certain level of imagination. What's the point of limiting one's argument with what was said, when you can make up statements that were never made, to defeat those with counterarguments that are not even applicable. Know you nothing of the priniples of strawmanicus argumenti?


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,226
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,226
Originally Posted by california rick
Originally Posted by Slipped Mickey
...When I was a USAF security policeman...
R-e-a-l-l-y...[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]

We did have our groupies. Must have been our big guns.


____________________



You, you and you, panic. The rest of you follow me.
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,226
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 12,226
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
Interestingly, most mass shootings (NEIS*), are stopped by unarmed bystanders.

*NEIS - not ending in suicide.

Well, yeah, after masses have been shot. Throw a human wave a one or two people with guns and the chances are sooner or later they'll be overwhelmed. I have no interest in being part of the human wave.

So Plan A is to stand there and get shot while hoping the shooter shoots everyone but you?


____________________



You, you and you, panic. The rest of you follow me.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Originally Posted by Slipped Mickey
Originally Posted by california rick
Originally Posted by Slipped Mickey
...When I was a USAF security policeman...
R-e-a-l-l-y...[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]

We did have our groupies. Must have been our big guns.

What sort of ammo were you shooting?


"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Originally Posted by Slipped Mickey
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
Interestingly, most mass shootings (NEIS*), are stopped by unarmed bystanders.

*NEIS - not ending in suicide.

Well, yeah, after masses have been shot. Throw a human wave a one or two people with guns and the chances are sooner or later they'll be overwhelmed. I have no interest in being part of the human wave.

So Plan A is to stand there and get shot while hoping the shooter shoots everyone but you?

Mickey
So this guy was clearly deranged
Would you say this circumstance is the most likely sort of reason that requires citizens to carry guns in public? Or if not the most likely need to carry, this reason in and of itself still is adequate justification to have citizens armed?


"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 128
L
veteran
Offline
veteran
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 128
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
... Know you nothing of the priniples of strawmanicus argumenti?
"I'd be witty, I'd be clever - would they ever fool me? Never! If I only had a brain... Hmm
I'd be swell, I'd be mellow, I'd be such a happy fellow, if I only had a brain." blush

I dedicate this video to the Wizard of 'Oddhos...



You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 128
L
veteran
Offline
veteran
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 128
Here is an image of: GUN CARRYING WOMAN...

[Linked Image from imageenvision.com]

I couldn't find one of: GUN CARRYING MAN.


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,939
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,939
Originally Posted by logtroll
Here is an image of: GUN CARRYING WOMAN...

[Linked Image from imageenvision.com]

I couldn't find one of: GUN CARRYING MAN.

Could it be because it's a phallus-y?


Take the nacilbupeR pledge: I solemnly swear that I will help back out all Republicans at the next election.
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,998
Likes: 187
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Online Sad
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 17,998
Likes: 187
I'm still having a hard time believing that in response to
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
Interestingly, most mass shootings (NEIS*), are stopped by unarmed bystanders.
the response is:
Originally Posted by Slipped Mickey
Well, yeah, after masses have been shot.
Does that mean that you agree that magazine limitations are an appropriate counter to mass shootings? How else does one limit the massiveness of mass shootings. Let's see, how many mass shootings have been stopped by armed intervention - before they became "mass"? ....

I'll wait for an answer (but I don't really expect one).

I realize that gun control debates go round and round, but that is because only one side makes an argument, and, like an axle with only one wheel, can only go around in circles. As far as I can discern, the only gun-lobby argument is "only more guns will stop more gun violence." Nevermind that there is no empirical evidence to show that. Never mind that history doesn't support that. Nevermind that it is counter-intuitive. It is an article of faith, only to be believed, and not challenged.

Well, I challenge it. For every singular example of an exception, I can provide dozens, hundreds, thousands of cases that prove the rule. I have only provided suggestions that have a proven track record, have empirical or logical support, and limited effect on any law abiding citizen with a desire to keep and bear arms (as I do and will continue to do).

Indeed, none of the proposals I have made would have prevented even the lauditory exceptional circumstances, like this one, trotted out as a sorry excuse for an argument against limited legal reform.

Would a magazine-size limitation have changed this situation? No. Would a registration scheme? A licensing regime? A background check? An assault weapons ban? Even a caliber restriction? No, no, no, no. We go back to a doctrine of faith, and simply say "gun control bad" - 'cause I believe it to be so!


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Page 5 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5