I think Bored is pointing out the legal right to cancel, and Log is saying that arrangement somewhat misses the point of insurance.
As an example, Blue cross can cancel your policy, the British national health service cannot cancel.
I can understand Log's point of view that he would prefer that insurance be more dependable come what may. I am not sure what the advantage is of having a policy that can be canceled.
And I am particularly not clear on why people would prefer not to have the option to have medical insurance that could not be canceled
Last edited by Ardy; 02/19/14 12:59 AM.
