Originally Posted by Bored Member
Originally Posted by logtroll
Originally Posted by Bored Member
Good point Ardy but what you and Log are referring to is socialized medicine, not health insurance.
Not at all, BM.

I began by saying that the concept of insurance, where a large number of people pool their resources in order to spread the risk, is inherently a socialist manifestation. Do you disagree with that concept?

Yes I do, in a monetized society the pooling of large numbers of risk is an actuarial function of the insurance business, not the insureds. If it were not for a large number of similar losses to insure, not only would it be impossible to write standardized forms but it would not be profitable.

Even in a mutual insurance exchange a fee for service applies, the only difference is that if the company shows more profit and less losses at the end of the year they return a portion of the premium dollars to the members.
Why does it have to be a business? Why does someone have to profit?

I see... to a capitalist, the first order of importance is profit. Does the existence of profit make the insurance better or cheaper?


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller