WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by Irked - 03/14/25 10:00 AM
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/11/25 11:16 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 16 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,260,915 my own book page
5,051,279 We shall overcome
4,250,718 Campaign 2016
3,856,322 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,489 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,430
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,539
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
Buzzard's Roost, Troyota
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#274281 10/04/14 08:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
Years ago, during a discussion in my South Carolina Family Law course, we turned to the topic of reproductive rights. Many in the class asserted the state's right to protect human life trumped a mother's right to determine what happened inside her body.

Borrowing a concept from Gloria Steinem regarding a willingness to surrender the fetus to the state to do with it as they wished, I suggested that if public policy indeed required protection of the fetus, then the body politic should invest in artificial wombs for the gestation of those fetuses not wanted by the biological causes of them. There were, predictably, howls of outrage, with the most reasoned among them rejecting the theory on the basis of impossibility.

Apparently, medical science has caught up with Gloria and me!

This should shift the debate from whether a woman may choose to which womb the unwanted fetus should transfer to.


"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Have you a link, my friend? I'd like to research.


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129
Likes: 257
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129
Likes: 257
Getting a transplant of somebody else's non-essential organ is a fundamentally bad idea. The best possible course of action for those women would be to remove their transplanted uterus and sanction the doctor who performed the transplants.

When we can grow them a new uterus from their own stem cells, that would be a different story. (And that's not far off, either.) Of course, once we can do that then couples can chose which parent should carry the child! Talk about disruption of the reproductive laws...


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5