WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by rporter314 - 03/13/25 08:45 PM
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/11/25 11:16 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 12 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,260,450 my own book page
5,051,255 We shall overcome
4,250,620 Campaign 2016
3,856,275 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,461 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,430
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,538
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
It's called "indirect pronoun reference."

I'm not sure there was a point, there, anyway, except to be snarky.


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
My point, with regard to this incident, would be that I am not at all surprised that FOX would fail to vet their "expert". They clearly hire based upon viewpoint, not qualifications. In this particular instance, I find it amazing that he would attempt to get a clearance based upon a doctored resume, which he clearly knew to be false. Maybe he had drunk the FOX Koolaid and believed alternate reality he was surrounded by. FOX, ironically, could potentially have a claim against him for fraud, in that they paid him for expertise claimed that he didn't have. Of course, he would have a defense in that he gave them what they wanted, and "the truth" is not required by the network, so what would they have to complain about?


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
OP Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
I have to agree with you, NWP! ThumbsUp


milk and Girl Scout cookies ;-)

Save your breath-You may need it to blow up your date.




Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373


Let's time-travel way back to January 2015 and see what Fox News was up to (read: lying about) then, shall we?

Quote
Fox’s terrorism commentator Steve Emerson claimed that there were certain neighborhoods and towns completely overrun with a Muslim population so fierce that even police wouldn’t enter them: according to him, there are “actually Muslim religious police that actually beat and actually wound seriously anyone who doesn’t dress according to religious Muslim attire.”

Needless to say, according to David Cameron and a bunch of mad French television stations, that’s not the case. Emerson has apologized, and Banderas profusely continued to apologize tonight:

Originally Posted by Fox News
To be clear, there is no formal designation of these zones in either country… and no credible information to support the assertion that there are specific areas in these countries that exclude individuals based solely on their religion. There are certainly areas of high crime in Europe as there are in the United States and other countries – where police and visitors enter with caution. We deeply regret the errors and apologize to any and all who may have taken offense including the people of France and England.

Linky Dink


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430
Likes: 373
Originally Posted by Ma_Republican
Does this mean that Obama can be indicted for claiming to enforce the Constitution?
Yet, per Telemundo, Obama is the Deporter-In-Chief. The "not defending the Constitution" line gets old - especially since it's not true.


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
OP Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 27,583
Ma_Republican-If all your posits were true, the Republican jackals would be filing charges right and left(pun intended). They have not been able to field one charge that has stuck. Just a lot of shouting and temper tantrum throwing. Now they are caught (and by their own admissions) using the investigative process to politically try and submarine Hillary Clinton. Some Senate Democrats have sent a letter to the RNC demanding that they repay the government for wasting tax-payer money. I agree.


milk and Girl Scout cookies ;-)

Save your breath-You may need it to blow up your date.




Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5