My point, with regard to this incident, would be that I am not at all surprised that FOX would fail to vet their "expert". They clearly hire based upon viewpoint, not qualifications. In this particular instance, I find it amazing that he would attempt to get a clearance based upon a doctored resume, which he clearly knew to be false. Maybe he had drunk the FOX Koolaid and believed alternate reality he was surrounded by. FOX, ironically, could potentially have a claim against him for fraud, in that they paid him for expertise claimed that he didn't have. Of course, he would have a defense in that he gave them what they wanted, and "the truth" is not required by the network, so what would they have to complain about?
