Theoretically speaking, if another couple were to appear in court who were wealthier than the foster parents and who were willing to put millions into a Trust Fund for the children and move them to Sweden where they would be safer and have better Health care - could the court decide, based on the theory of "what is best for the children's future prospects", to place them in that new home?
Would they be willing to kick in a $ million or so to the Republican National Committee? If so, then the answer would be, "You bet!"
