I'm glad you wrote that last post NW_P. I'll be looking into those articles on militia later, as those are not my focus here and I'm not myself party to any such organization.

Looking at this link you posted earlier, http://kval.com/news/local/backgrou...ases-on-hammond-case-in-october-december
It becomes clear that my sources on these events have been wrong on some statements. These include the terrorist claim.
I still have doubts about the justice here. Way back, 45 years ago, I worked at a dairy farm that was completely destroyed by fire. It was a wooden building with up to 50 tons of dry hay stored above the cows.
After the fired had burned out, the bodies of those cows were still individual and holding up as separate carcases. Had any forensic personell wanted to check them for bullets to see if they were shot before burned, that would have been entirely possible.
Therefore I still don't believe it is possible to illegally shoot a bunch of deer and cover up the crime with a grassfire. The bodies would still be there. So when the verdict says that evidence was destroyed in the fire, they either didn't look or the Hammonds were convicted on testimony, not evidence.
The other thing is the lighting of fire to one's own land to create a barrier of burnt land to stop a wild fire, it can not be crime. Failing with that prospect is misfortunate, but shall it in all fairness be deemed a crime?
I still argue that an administered and served sentence, although wrongly shortened by the court should not be able to come back and haunt the those who served the time. It should haunt those who served the sentence.

The OJ. Simpson case has left us with a lot of question marks regarding American justice.

Cowardly men always plot to label Freedom as anarchy!