Originally Posted by bigswede
Yes, the testimonies given by different people must have been compelling. Why the would the Attorneys office say evidence was destroyed?
The sentencing judge made an illegal sentencing. The illegality of it was per the American people, not the Hammonds. If there should be a correction towards the American people it should be the judge on trial.

They said the fire was started in an attempt to conceal or destroy evidence of the illegal hunting expedition..... You are mincing words.

The first judge was trying to go easy on the Hammonds, the Feds stepped in a cried foul. The Hammonds knew what the cost of their folly could be, they chose to ignore it.

Last edited by Bored Member; 05/17/16 04:12 PM.