LOL ... sorry but pretzel arguments are amusing

Quote
It's still a very open question wether the motivation for their behaviour is "furtherance of political or social objectives" or economic, ie. criminal in the way of fraud or theft.
If it is the latter, it's not terrorism.
logT beat me to it ... are you now arguing they are just plain old garden variety criminals?

Quote
The lawfulness of their actions have been called to question, but their actions have no been tried and found unlawful.
again you are conflating the action with a verdict. If I murder someone and the jury does not convict me, does that imply I am innocent of committing murder?

Using your argument, I have every right to legally occupy federal buildings and keep people from entering, all because you can't figure out if my actions are unlawful. Clearly what the Bundys did in Nevada and Oregon was unlawful i.e. I can point out the federal statues which they violated, which are recorded on video and audio tapes.

If you want to side with the Bundy terrorists then at least say it correctly. The Bundys committed crimes for which they were not convicted. There is no other equivocations.

ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
America can survive bad policy, but not destruction of our Democratic institutions