Bundy objected to the Federal government demanding to be payed the grazing fees, he claimed it would be the right of the state of Nevada or the local community. Not, as I understand, the level of the fees.

rporter claims that makes his stance political and therefore an act of terrorism. I can see how an argument that it is a political point made by Bundy, and not just fiscal resentment. But if the federal definition of terrorism comes that conclusion, the federal definition needs to be looked at and perhaps mitigated some.

The fees may be reasonable, NW Ponderer's calculation point in that direction, but it does not really have any bearing on who should have the right to collect the fee.
In many farmers experience the fees themselves are not a true indication of what the costs to operate the business are. Getting quite OT here.

Cowardly men always plot to label Freedom as anarchy!