WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
"The idea behind the Electoral College is to force a Presidential candidate build a large coalition of voters from every state in the country."
The idea behind the EC was to bring slave states into the Union. This is where the 5/8 clouting of black male slaves came from.
This is another example of your ignorance pdx rick. It was the 3/5 compromise not the 5/8 compromise...
5/8...3/5...meh - the fact remains that the EC is very much tied to slavery.
Quote
Standard civics-class accounts of the Electoral College rarely mention the real demon dooming direct national election in 1787 and 1803: slavery.
...
At the Philadelphia convention, the visionary Pennsylvanian James Wilson proposed direct national election of the president. But the savvy Virginian James Madison responded that such a system would prove unacceptable to the South: “The right of suffrage was much more diffusive [i.e., extensive] in the Northern than the Southern States; and the latter could have no influence in the election on the score of Negroes.” In other words, in a direct election system, the North would outnumber the South, whose many slaves (more than half a million in all) of course could not vote. But the Electoral College—a prototype of which Madison proposed in this same speech—instead let each southern state count its slaves, albeit with a two-fifths discount, in computing its share of the overall count.
...
If the system’s pro-slavery tilt was not overwhelmingly obvious when the Constitution was ratified, it quickly became so. For 32 of the Constitution’s first 36 years, a white slaveholding Virginian occupied the presidency.
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
Originally Posted by pdx rick
We don't have slavery any longer - much to most modern Conservative's chagrin.
That comment is an insult to and a lie about Conservatives.
1870s Klan Members and 1930s Jim Crow writing Conservative Southern Democrats would disagree with you. What's that thing about conserving the past?