WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/31/25 07:57 PM
Trump 2.0
by Irked - 03/27/25 08:46 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 23 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,262,889 my own book page
5,052,768 We shall overcome
4,253,928 Campaign 2016
3,857,919 Trump's Trumpet
3,057,077 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,433
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,129
Posts314,587
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
Fermi paradox
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 10 of 47 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 46 47
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 133
L
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 133
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
Originally Posted by logtroll
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
I strongly believe that the Electoral College is one of the things that makes our Constitution the greatest political/legal document ever written.
Do you have an example of how the electoral college has produced a superior (above average at least) leader for the United States? How about any tangible benefit?
The purpose of the Electoral College is not to produce superior leaders. That is the responsibility of the American voters. It's purpose to balance the power of states with small populations against those with large populations.
Tell that to Hamilton and Madison. They'd be shocked you didn't understand their well written arguments,
You would think that after some 240-odd years of history that there would lots of easily identifiable tangible benefits resulting from "one of the things that makes our Constitution the greatest political/legal document ever written".


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
Originally Posted by logtroll
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
Originally Posted by logtroll
[quote=Senator Hatrack]I strongly believe that the Electoral College is one of the things that makes our Constitution the greatest political/legal document ever written.
Do you have an example of how the electoral college has produced a superior (above average at least) leader for the United States? How about any tangible benefit?
The purpose of the Electoral College is not to produce superior leaders. That is the responsibility of the American voters. It's purpose to balance the power of states with small populations against those with large populations.
Tell that to Hamilton and Madison. They'd be shocked you didn't understand their well written arguments,
Originally Posted by logtroll
You would think that after some 240-odd years of history that there would lots of easily identifiable tangible benefits resulting from "one of the things that makes our Constitution the greatest political/legal document ever written".
That you are participating in a free and open political discussion is a very easily identifiable tangible benefit of our Constitution. The fact that 44 times the leadership of our government has peacefully changed hands is another one. The amendment process of Article V of our Constitution is another. Logtroll are you forced to be a member of the official state religion? No, you are not because there isn't an official state religion. There are lots of easily identifiable tangible benefits that come from our Constitution. It is unfortunate that you are unable to see them when they are an integral part of your life!


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 133
L
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 133
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
[/quote]That you are participating in a free and open political discussion is a very easily identifiable tangible benefit of our Constitution. The fact that 44 times the leadership of our government has peacefully changed hands is another one. The amendment process of Article V of our Constitution is another. Logtroll are you forced to be a member of the official state religion? No, you are not because there isn't an official state religion. There are lots of easily identifiable tangible benefits that come from our Constitution. It is unfortunate that you are unable to see them when they are an integral part of your life!
The subject is the electoral college, not the Constitution in general. I have made that clear numerous times.

Please reread my comments with that in mind, and respond accordingly.


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 729
Likes: 3
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 729
Likes: 3
In keeping with logtroll's admonition to keep the conversation to the Electoral College.

The proof that this form of electing a president is obsolete and should be replaced, comes from the Founding Fathers themselves, specifically The Federalist Papers : No. 68. "The process of election affords a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications."

The 2016 Electoral College failed in their Constitutional task to prevent the unqualified from attaining the Office of President in Donald (Coward, Misogynist, Traitorous, Lying, Spiller of Secrets, etc) Trump. Best argument to move to a true Democratic Republic form of Government - one person one vote. They who has the most votes wins, now that is a true representative form of government.


Vote 2022!

Life is like a PB&J sandwich. The older you get, the moldery and crustier you get.

Now, get off my grass!
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
I admit, I am opinionated, and even arrogant when it comes to subjects I know well. For many years I defended the Electoral College - and for certain purposes I still do (although weakly anymore). In conception it is a bulwark against things going horribly wrong. But, as with many things in government, it has not worked as advertised, and is showing its decrepitude. Trump should never have happened, that is certainly true. The "fail safe" function of the EC was the last vestige of respectability it possessed, but it failed spectacularly to keep us safe.

There are structural and social impediments to fixing things that are wrong in government, and that includes specifically, the EC; more generally, the Constitution; and even more generally, government itself. More than two-thirds of the voting population is wedded to one or another major party. That loyalty, in its current form, prevents consideration of ideas from "the other side". Even things that are universally popular among the population cannot get traction in Congress or the White House. Obama, for his faults, remained committed to keeping that dialog open, but he never had a receptive audience, and eventually had to move on.

The antidote, I thought, was going to be a strong Supreme Court opinion striking down partisan gerrymandering. That might have begun steering this ponderous ship in the proper direction. But that institution is also too far gone, now. It has been infected with hyper-partisanship, just like the other branches. It may eventually recover, with proper timing and circumstances, but I don't see a significant alteration in my lifetime, which brings on depressive thoughts.

I would have thought that conservatives would be in favor of preserving these institutions, and as a former "conservative" would have myself, but I see just how naive I was, and perhaps am, still. Laws, norms, and constitutional expectations still motivate me, though; the grand experiment may yet recover from the partisan stupidity, but I have my doubts. I think, if the next election goes well, the next generation may have a chance to right the ship. I may be around to see that happen (or falter). When I think that way, I get optimistic again. There are big things to get done, and soon. Conservatives, and conservatism, stand in the way of that, so are now obsolete. I wish them/it well in their/its dotage.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Quote
In keeping with logtroll's admonition to keep the conversation to the Electoral College.

The proof that this form of electing a president is obsolete and should be replaced, comes from the Founding Fathers themselves, specifically The Federalist Papers : No. 68. "The process of election affords a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications."

Back in the founders day, government in general was a plaything of the wealthy. They set things up so that wealthy land and slave holders would be in charge. Wealthy land and slave holders are still in charge.(our Corporate Overlords)

The point I've made before is that the Electoral College gave voters a chance to voice their opinions but the wealthy land and slave holders made the final decision.(their Corporate Overlords)

When the FFs put their heads together there were only a handful of states and the total population was under 4 million. There was a lot they didn't and couldn't foresee, but the genius of the contract they put forth has resonated down the ages. With just a few nips and tucks it has survived intact. Because the boys made it flexible.

The Electoral College has outlived its usefulness.


Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
Originally Posted by logtroll
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
That you are participating in a free and open political discussion is a very easily identifiable tangible benefit of our Constitution. The fact that 44 times the leadership of our government has peacefully changed hands is another one. The amendment process of Article V of our Constitution is another. Logtroll are you forced to be a member of the official state religion? No, you are not because there isn't an official state religion. There are lots of easily identifiable tangible benefits that come from our Constitution. It is unfortunate that you are unable to see them when they are an integral part of your life!
Originally Posted by logtroll
The subject is the electoral college, not the Constitution in general. I have made that clear numerous times.

Please reread my comments with that in mind, and respond accordingly.

Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
I read your comments and replied to them. Here is your comment that I replied to.
Originally Posted by logtroll
You would think that after some 240-odd years of history that there would lots of easily identifiable tangible benefits resulting from "one of the things that makes our Constitution the greatest political/legal document ever written".
You asked a general question about our Constitution and I answered it. Now because you don't like my answer you are saying I'm not responding properly. Despite what you think I did respond properly.


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
The ONLY reason liberals want to get rid of the Electoral College is because Hillary Clinton lost! Had the results of the election been reversed, Trump winning the popular vote but losing in the Electoral College, they would not have anything bad to say about it. Well that's too freaking bad! Changing the rules after they cost you the election is not how a representative democracy works.

Our Founding Fathers knew that people of virtue would not always be in our government.

"Occupants of public offices love power and are prone to abuse it." George Washington
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree." James Madison

That those comments were made shows that the members of the Constitutional Convention did not create the Electoral College with the idea of it being protection against unqualified people from becoming our President.

The reason that the quality of people in our government has declined is not due to the failure of anything our Founding Fathers did. We have people running our government who aren't qualified to run a small business. They are there because we have stopped doing what we should be doing. What we should be doing is reverse these numbers, the approval rating and reelection rate for members of Congress. Currently Congress has an approval rating of about 11% and a reelection rate of 95%.

Another reason the Electoral College did not fail is due how we look to whoever is the President to fix our country while we keep reelecting incompetent idiots to Congress. Congress run is supposed to run our country not our current President. How can any President, regardless of party, fix problems in four to eight years that the idiots in Congress who are, or have been, there for decades? It can't be done! Our Presidents are not the cause of what is wrong with America, WE ARE!


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 133
L
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 133
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
You asked a general question about our Constitution and I answered it. Now because you don't like my answer you are saying I'm not responding properly. Despite what you think I did respond properly.
You are a dishonest man. I will not engage with you any further.


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
The ONLY reason liberals want to get rid of the Electoral College is because Hillary Clinton lost!
You lose that argument with the first sentence. Well done! As a purported "classical liberal" that conception just doesn't work. Moreover, painting with only one color tends to be very boring. Put the labeler away and address the substance, please. There are many of us, liberal and conservative alike, who have found the EC unworkable. Do you know how long it has been argued to be unworkable? I'll give you a hint: Madison was still alive.

Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
That those comments were made shows that the members of the Constitutional Convention did not create the Electoral College with the idea of it being protection against unqualified people from becoming our President.
Even Madison disagrees with you on that one. That's the problem with relying on conservative websites for your quotes, you miss the context (and the point).

Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
The reason that the quality of people in our government has declined is not due to the failure of anything our Founding Fathers did.
Well, yeah, it is. They created parties.
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
We have people running our government who aren't qualified to run a small business.
Now we are getting somewhere...
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
They are there because we have stopped doing what we should be doing. What we should be doing is reverse these numbers, the approval rating and reelection rate for members of Congress. Currently Congress has an approval rating of about 11% and a reelection rate of 95%.
Yes, and how did we fix that?
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
[W]e keep reelecting incompetent idiots to Congress. Congress is supposed to run our country not our current President.
See, we can find common ground.
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
How can any President, regardless of party, fix problems in four to eight years that the idiots in Congress who are, or have been, there for decades? It can't be done! Our Presidents are not the cause of what is wrong with America, WE ARE!
Hmmm. So it wasn't all Obama's fault? Bravo!

Page 10 of 47 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 46 47

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5