Lemon v. Kurtzman was wrong because it did not establish a religion. By citing Lemon v. Kurtzman you did not use the Jeffersonian definition of the establishment clause. None of the three prongs in the Lemon test deal with the funding of a religion. That is why I said that Lemon v. Kurtzman was wrong. If you truly do believe in the Jeffersonian definition of the establishment of religion you would also say that Lemon v. Kurtzman is wrong. But you didn't. Instead you cited it as a good example of how the Supreme Court has correctly ruled on the separation of church and state.


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary