Originally Posted by Greger
So Hills and Liz are really the same person? With the same flaws, the same records and the same dreary future if either were elected...

What has Sanders got that will win the nomination for him? He better pull it out of his pocket pretty soon now.

I feel like Biden and Clinton are much more similar, but I'd take Clinton in a heartbeat over that old hairspray sniffer.

Hills and Liz have much the same constituency, Have had the same political trajectories, though timed differently and are from the same class. O.K., Hillary got wonderfully rich going in to politics so economically they are differences but they like to identify with the white collar class.

Warren is now talking 'access' to healthcare so she appears to be signaling?. Dunno how her commitment to medicare for all to Sanders will fare after the primaries. We'll see.

Warren has that lanyard nerdiness. She's got them up to the date truth bombs on her web site with round the clock updates and revisions to help you with the truth...
Reminds me of Clintons approach during her debacle of a run. When has fact checking been a substitute for politics? NERD!!!

I doubt she would take bribes from Goldman in the same way that Clinton did, Warren would creat the case for it's continued existence, with some stronger worded, larger printed, italicised type font on the board game lid.

Now there's rumors she's even in consult with the crater maker. Why, after you tried distancing yourself from Clinton in the start of your campaign, would you be consulting the author of the parties 2016 presidential cratering? ( I know, I know, won by 3 million votes, Russians!, Sander supporters, etc...)

I prefer Sanders for his steady consistency over the decades to Warrens bio, but if it can't be Sanders, Warren will be a Hillaryesque consolation.

I also don't think she's enough of a politician to beat Trump.

Last edited by chunkstyle; 09/13/19 02:38 PM.