Originally Posted by logtroll
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
If I or any other conservative post an article from any conservative sources it is dismissed solely because it is from a conservative source. Yet if the same article is posted from a liberal source it accepted without question.
That may be what you perceive, but what I see is that most of what you call ‘rejected due to source’ is actually rebutted due to false content.

On the subject of bad sources, those can be identified generally by a lack of independently corroborating source material that shows the substance to be non-temious. As it happens, over time some purveyors news and facts establish a reputation for only pitching fake news and alternative facts. Because of that demonstrated lack of trustworthiness they will be quickly rejected as sources if there is no validating corroboration.

Of course, we are all free to express opinions, even opinions unsupported by solid factual information. But those can be rebutted by opinions, too. A good argument, on the other hand, needs more than that.
It is not my perception that the problem here logtroll. What you claim is rejected due to false content is because it is as William F. Buckley said about liberals.
Originally Posted by William F. Buckley
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.
The responses to my comments prove what Buckley said. All of them we critical of me and in defense of a fellow liberal. It is not false content that is rejected it is anything that a conservative says that is rejected.

The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary