WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
2024 Election Forum
by Irked - 05/12/25 12:51 AM
Trump 2.0
by perotista - 04/30/25 08:48 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 7 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,269,106 my own book page
5,056,317 We shall overcome
4,257,910 Campaign 2016
3,861,700 Trump's Trumpet
3,060,467 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,433
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,129
Posts314,632
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 32 of 114 1 2 30 31 32 33 34 113 114
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Just as many Trump sycophantsCabinet members and White House appointees prostrate themselves before their Dear Leader, performing for an audience of one to remain in His Good Graces, it has to be remembered that Pelosi is seeking to persuade only 20 people: the 20 senators she needs to have Trump removed from office. She is bringing them on slowly, building public pressure so that they can see the stark political realities of supporting a corrupt leader. Either they support his removal, or encourage their own removal. And, this will not be a one-time thing, either. In two years there will be another election and opportunity to remind voters who supported the Constitution and who supported corruption. REPUBLICANS don't want another four years of Trump. They just don't know how to get rid of the tar baby.

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 133
L
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
L
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 133
Executive privilege

Neither executive privilege nor Congressional presidential oversight are in the Constitution, so their authority is established through precedent. Both are the subject of court cases being heard today - Kupperman's duty to obey a subpoena from Congress vs Trump's orders to not appear; and Don McGahn's long-running refusal to testify before Congress regarding the Mueller investigation.

My understanding of executive privilege is that it applies to maintaining the confidentiality of conversations between the president and immediate advisors on issues pertaining to national security or the ability of the government to function properly.

While a case could be made that "taking down" a president is a matter that probably would have the effects listed above, if the confidentiality relates to wrongdoing then it stands to reason that any secret information needs to be revealed precisely to improve national security and proper functioning of the government.

Surely EP does not apply to covering up presidential crimes. But what will the courts say?


You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 729
Likes: 3
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 729
Likes: 3
In my reading, logtroll is right, Congressional Oversight of the President, is not directly mentioned or granted in the Constitution. However, it is implied. Here is the Supreme Court Decision that firmly established that Congress has the power of oversight: Watkins v. United States, 354 U.S. 178 (1957) and a Constitution Society article on the matter: Oversight Is a Constitutional Necessity, Not a Luxury.

I am no lawyer, so I may be so far out in left field on my reading that being wrong would be a mercy.


Vote 2022!

Life is like a PB&J sandwich. The older you get, the moldery and crustier you get.

Now, get off my grass!
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,433
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,433
Likes: 373



Rightwigers are getting their wish today: The House will vote on a formal Impeachment Inquiry for Donald J Trump


Chief among this vote is to open the inquiry to public hearings. This will be a good thing for the American people to hear for themselves just what a lying crook Donald J Trump actually is.

smile


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,110
Likes: 136
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,110
Likes: 136

Executive Privilege
Originally Posted by nolo.com
The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decision-making processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.[ed.]


ignorance is the enemy
without equality there is no liberty
America can survive bad policy, but not destruction of our Democratic institutions



Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,178
Likes: 255
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Online Happy
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,178
Likes: 255
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
Just as many Trump sycophantsCabinet members and White House appointees prostrate themselves before their Dear Leader, performing for an audience of one to remain in His Good Graces, it has to be remembered that Pelosi is seeking to persuade only 20 people: the 20 senators she needs to have Trump removed from office. She is bringing them on slowly, building public pressure so that they can see the stark political realities of supporting a corrupt leader. Either they support his removal, or encourage their own removal. And, this will not be a one-time thing, either. In two years there will be another election and opportunity to remind voters who supported the Constitution and who supported corruption. REPUBLICANS don't want another four years of Trump. They just don't know how to get rid of the tar baby.

Yeah they do, they just hate the notion of being forced to take that nasty cod liver oil twice in less than a century, twice in less than HALF a century, no less.

They know it's gonna sting.
The rest of the country will have to force them to stand in the corner for a time-out.


"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,178
Likes: 255
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Online Happy
It's the Despair Quotient!
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,178
Likes: 255
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
They just don't know how to get rid of the tar baby.

By the way, I am sensing a trend, maybe one of them thar innernet viral things. You're maybe the fifth person in a week that I have heard use the term "tar baby".

You are clearly in good company, Mistuh NWP! ThumbsUp


"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,433
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,433
Likes: 373


For you disbelieving conservatives: Andrew Napolitano explains all of Trump's shenanigans and criminality for you.

Fox News Channel.com

You're welcome. smile


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,433
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,433
Likes: 373
Originally Posted by Jeffery J. Haas
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
They just don't know how to get rid of the tar baby.

By the way, I am sensing a trend, maybe one of them thar innernet viral things. You're maybe the fifth person in a week that I have heard use the term "tar baby".

You are clearly in good company, Mistuh NWP! ThumbsUp

#TarBaby

smile


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,433
Likes: 373
Member
CHB-OG
Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,433
Likes: 373

Nancy's resolution in the House passed with a final vote of 232 to 196. Pretty much along party lines with two Dems voting no.
Collin Peterson (MN) and Jeff Van Drew (NJ) are the two Dems who voted against the bill.

It's on conservatives. What are you going to bellyache about now? smile


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Page 32 of 114 1 2 30 31 32 33 34 113 114

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5