0 members (),
13
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,547
Members6,305
|
Most Online294 Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,428 Likes: 1
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,428 Likes: 1 |
For anyone concerned about the economy, here is an excellent analysis of the Financial Industry, and a serious warning of what could be a very near term catastrophe. Are Banks in trouble? If, after reading the article, you feel that there are any mitigating circumstances that could save the world markets from a financial Armageddon, would you share your thoughts here?
Last edited by itstarted; 09/10/07 11:40 AM.
Life is Good!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 973
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 973 |
Funny thing IS,
A month or so ago when this whole subprime thing really started becoming news, I went in and had a chat with my bank. Frankly? I wanted to make SURE my money would be accessible, to ME.
We spoke of mortgages etc, turns out the bank I use writes their own mortgages, and holds and services them in-house. You must be extremely creditworthy to get a mortgage through them, and while it doesn't make me feel truly secure, it did make me feel a bit better. They also assured me that they weren't involved in investing in mortgage secured bundles, At this moment, I'm glad my banking isn't done with one of the mega-banks, mine is regional, and apparently rather consrevative in their practices.
But, after reading the article, I am appalled that the safeguards put in place after 1929 have been removed, I had no idea this had happened, and I cannot believe minds far greater than mine thought this was 'OK'!! What in the heck were they thinking?
Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels -- men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, we may never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,428 Likes: 1
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,428 Likes: 1 |
I would like to keep this thread alive for reference purposes. I believe that the ultimate resolution of what has been called "Subprime lending", will be a recession/depression/worldwide upheaval of the banking system. A desperate struggle is going on right now, to avoid a liquidity crisis in the monetary system. The very best hope to avoid this, is some kind of agreement between the largest banks, to accept the Derivatives... (CDO's) that have been allowed to proliferate within the monetary system. This is unlikely, since the egregious policies that have been allowed, are too great to be swept under the rug of "Bank Assets". This article explains the problem and the likely outcome... (not in the opening paragraphs but in the final ones). Rather than try to explain, I will continue to research and post articles that cover this "first ever" phenomenon of exposing the deepest secrets of bankers and money managers. Here's the latest, and one that goes to the heart of the problem. Banks at Risk for Failure... an analysis Stay tuned for more...
Life is Good!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 973
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 973 |
Oh how I hate feeling ignorant, but when it comes to the language of high finance, I am, woefully so.
Can someone translate for us mere mortals? I think I know what the author is saying in general, but I'm not entirely sure I catch the nuance.
Thanks!
Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels -- men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, we may never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,428 Likes: 1
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,428 Likes: 1 |
Let me give a try at explanation. If it were easy, the media might have figured it out by now.
The last referenced article said two things. First, that the Stock markets have been soothed for the short term, because the Fed will likely reduce the costs to banks to loan money by lowering the Fed Rate. It just means that the banks will be able to borrow from the Fed at a low rate, and not be pressed by a liquidity crisis.
The second part is the crux of the Bank's underlying problems.
It used to be.. back in the 80's that banks had to keep a portion of their assets in a liquid form, to be able to handle demands on those assets by those with rights to them.
The assets could be gold, or individual mortgages, or items with a recognizeable value. Items that could be converted into cash.
This limited the banks to holding these liquid assets. During the Clinton Administration, the banks lobbied (300 million Dollars worth) to allow the banks to "Secure" these required assets. This meant that they could combine (for instance) mortgages, into what is called Collateralized Debt Obligation(s)... A piece of paper that represented (perhaps) 20 mortgtages... avg value $200,000. This would be a CDO, worth $4 Million dollars. This CDO could then be sold, transferred, swapped, divided into smaller CDO's, usually to Mortgage of Investment companies.
This allowed the bank to raceive money for the CDO, to then loan out again for othr purposes... more mortgages, or loans for other purposes.
Now here's the problem... once the CDO's debt (or what they now call credit) changes hands, it now becomes a "Security" which is not easily convertable, for several reasons. First, no one knows how much that CDO is really worth. (What if 4 of those houses that represented the original CDO... burned down. What if the houses ended up in depressed areas, and the values went down? What if the mortgagees can no longer pay their mortgages?)
The CDO that was worth $4 million is now worth WHAT?
In many cases, the CDO's were made up of very risky mortgages. The $4 Million dollars may be worth much, much less.
The banks... and really, EVERYONE is afraid to buy the CDO securities.
People, Organizations, Corporations, and yes, Banks, who own these CDO's, cannot sell or trade these CDO's without taking serious risks.
Can't sell, and can't provide liquidity to pay back other debts. That's it... in a nutshell.
Now, you go to the bank... to take out money from your checking account. The bank doesn't have the dollars to pay you. They cannot borrow, even though they have Value that they carry on the books (those CDO's that the government allowed them to create and trade). ....................................................... There is so much more to it than this. The fact that the CDO's are created with calculated risk factors, designed by mathmeticians who create formulas that supposedly give ratings of the risk. They then use these risk factors to assign a dollar value to the CDO's... This makes them derivatives... The derivatives are then sold on margin, and traded, swapped, exchanged, and sliced and diced into totally new money instruments. All of this further obscures the values of the original mortgages. Supposedly, the risks are updated, by recalculating them (Called Mark to Market Value). Unfortunately this is not regulated and in many cases is not done at all.
The GREAT FEAR is that Banks and Brokers are holding vast sums (TRILLIONS) of dollars of securities (including CDO's) that are being held at original value, NEVER HAVING BEEN MARKED TO MARKET.
This (failure to mark to market) is also a reason why some banks and brokers are taking back their own CDO's. It allows them to keep the risky securities as base assets, without having to revalue them.
It's a spider web that is not able to be unravelled.
It's world wide, because every country in the world has bought and traded these CDO's... some countries are more involved than others, but all are affected.
Lastly... because of the derivative/hedge fund markets... much of the value was bought and sold on margin. No one anywhere knows how much of this exists, or when it comes due. The margin amount is related to the full amount (called the Notional Value). The amount of Notional value existing at any one time is staggering, ranging into hundreds of trillions of dollars on an annual basis. (forget about trying to understand this part... no one knows.)
There are virtually no regulations to cover this, and no intermediary to come in and establish values. ..........................................
Reading back on this, I realize it's a terrible explanation of a much more complex subject. It's quite a challenge to try and explain this without getting into obscure technical terms.
Because I really DO believe that we will have a meltdown, now or later, I think it's important to understand why. For those who own equities of any kind, understanding the bigger picture, may help in making decisions before this happens.
Last edited by itstarted; 09/15/07 04:48 PM. Reason: to correct a few of many misspellings
Life is Good!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 1
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 1 |
For anyone concerned about the economy, here is an excellent analysis of the Financial Industry, and a serious warning of what could be a very near term catastrophe. Are Banks in trouble? If, after reading the article, you feel that there are any mitigating circumstances that could save the world markets from a financial Armageddon, would you share your thoughts here? Northern Rock bank in the UK is certainly in trouble "Shares in one of the UK's largest mortgage lenders, Northern Rock, have fallen 32% after it had to ask the Bank of England for emergency funding...." Banking sources suggest that on Friday alone clients pulled out £1bn - or 4-5% of retail deposits.
"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words." (Philip K.Dick)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,428 Likes: 1
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,428 Likes: 1 |
Henry C.K.Liu, is my personal guru for all things economic. Liu Sept 17 article Here is just a small part of the article.. The scurry by banks to shore up their deteriorating balance sheets as the commercial-paper market dries up as a source of funding for many of their highly leveraged borrowers could slow down bank funding for consumer credit further, to cause a downward spiral of more layoffs in the already anemic US economy. Also, as recently completed private-equity deals structured with cheap money turn distressed with a credit squeeze, massive layoffs in the target companies will follow, adding to a further sharp rise in unemployment.
More ominous, the wide anticipation for a rate cut by the Fed at its September 18 FOMC meeting has already pressured the exchange rate of the US dollar, pushing up gold prices. By September 12, the GLD exchange-traded fund (ETF) for gold set a 52-week high of $70, with gold prices rising above $700 per ounce from $610 in January. Oil has risen above $80 per barrel. Food prices are rising. A further weakening of the dollar combined with faster-growing economies in emerging markets means foreign investors would invest in non-dollar zones or in US companies that have non-dollar revenue, further weakening the US domestic market.
All 10 major sectors in the S&P fell lower on September 7, and for the week, the US consumer discretionary sector fell 3.2% amid fears over lower consumer spending. Home-builders lost 6.8% for the week, taking their fall for the year to 50%. Financials declined 2.6% for the week, while the S&P Investment Bank Index fell 0.8% on the day of the discouraging jobs report, taking its loss for the year to 16.5%.
Investors are still waiting nervously to see whether the market can clear a backlog of $300 billion in unsold debt paper and bonds associated with this year's record private-equity buyout deals. In the midst of all the negative news, it is sometime forgotten that the Dow Jones Industrial Average is still above 13,000, a level substantially higher than economic fundamentals would justify. Left alone, a truly free market would adjust downward by as much as 40% before all the liquidity fluff is removed. The pleasure of excess in the market is never restrained by the excess of pleasure, which unfortunately must be paid for at some point by pain in the economy 40% Liquidity Fluff.... ach....
Life is Good!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
|
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655 |
It is my personal belief that should there be problems in the financial world that we let the market take care of itself. Government intervention only prolonged the Great Depression and helped usher in the slow rise in the size of our government. The possibility of pain and suffering are large but in the long run removing some of the shackles of government from our economy is something that needs to be done. Government meddling causes more problems than it solves.
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity. I'm a conservative because I question authority. Conservative Revolutionary
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator Bionic Scribe
|
Administrator Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134 |
It is my personal belief that should there be problems in the financial world that we let the market take care of itself. Government intervention only prolonged the Great Depression and helped usher in the slow rise in the size of our government. The possibility of pain and suffering are large but in the long run removing some of the shackles of government from our economy is something that needs to be done. Government meddling causes more problems than it solves. Actually, if you have studied the situation, you will conclude that government saved this nation from breaking apart and the economy going to pre-industrial levels during the depression. Part of the delay in remedying the disaster tht the "market" wrought in the 20's came from the rulings of the right wing Supreme Court. The government must control the economy much more than it does now in order to save us from an even worse economic disaster.
Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,290
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,290 |
My favorite too, but Henry Liu is not light reading. I agree with you on Liu, It's. Each of his sentences is packed with meaning and takes a long time to read properly. It is certaily worth the effort it takes! TAT
There's nothing wrong with thinking Except that it's lonesome work sevil regit
|
|
|
|
|