Originally Posted by Mellowicious
Pondering, I had no idea. Oddly, that’s one of the scenarios I sketched out in a post I think I deleted, and one of the original questions I intended for this thread. It looks to me as though the court used a sort of “common-law” fatherhood idea.
Pondering is right...there are many cases like this. The Court's rational is that the kid grew-up believing the guy is the dad - even the dad thought he was the dad and to change course now would be like pulling the rug from under the kid...and too bad - the kid's well-being is more important here.


This is why there are now law firms specializing in Divorce for Men Only. Hmm

Contrarian, extraordinaire