Originally Posted by chunkstyle
Does David Frum have credibility with you NWP?
Jesus, you're just a repetitious one-note song, aren't you.

NO, I'm not quoting David Frum because he's a "credible source" or I believe in him, but because he lays out the FACTS that were laid out by the REPUBLICAN committee that investigated the circumstances. Neither has an incentive to undercut the Republican party or further a Democratic agenda. There's a legal principle behind that credibility, it's called "a statement against interest." A genuine suggestion: get out of your own head, listen to reason, and evaluate things rationally, my friend. I really don't know where you are coming from, but it isn't the real world.

Have you read the Mueller Report? Do you have a clue what is in it? Do you have a law degree? Have you evaluated the evidence in light of the law? You keep pulling things out of god-know-where and making outlandish pronouncements that have - at best - a tentative connection to things like... oh, facts, evidence, reality. It's getting more than a little bothersome.

A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich