|
0 members (),
16
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,539
Members6,305
| |
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831 Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831 Likes: 180 |
A belief in the Easter Bunny is not in itself stupid, but the choice to remain ignorant of the existence of the Easter Bunny, regardless of how strongly one believes in it, is stupid. And the belief that the Democratic Party is ever going to help the working class is stupid. Perhaps if the two parties merge ideologically there will finally be room for a third party.
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,473 Likes: 38
member
|
|
member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,473 Likes: 38 |
quote=Greger] There needs to be a way to put some teeth into law quote=Greger][You mean there needs to be a way to lock up our political enemies even though the law doesn't say they should be locked up...it's a slippery slope/quote] It's way beyond a slippery slope when a "president" pardons anyone who obstructs a thoroughly whored justice dept to cover up the most clear sedition attempt in Amerkin history. No penalty, no foul, is the message you would like to send? Some socialist TAT
There's nothing wrong with thinking
Except that it's lonesome work
sevil regit
|
|
1 member likes this:
Jeffery J. Haas |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
So who gets to decide who’s stupid?
Will it be skull shapes? Ethnicity? Voting the correct way? Diplomas? Chasing ghost stories? All men are created equal, so I guess the stupidity selection question has to be settled by women?
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
So who gets to decide who’s stupid? Excellent question. How do you think the selection should be done?
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,473 Likes: 38
member
|
|
member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,473 Likes: 38 |
So who gets to decide who’s stupid?
Will it be skull shapes? Ethnicity? Voting the correct way? Diplomas? Chasing ghost stories? All men are created equal, so I guess the stupidity selection question has to be settled by women? Check Mate, she might be reading this dangerous screed! That should not be confused with Scrod! When a Boston visitor asked his taxi driver where he could get Scrod, the driver responded with: Ive been asked that question many times, but never in the pluperfect subjunctive! TAT
There's nothing wrong with thinking
Except that it's lonesome work
sevil regit
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,210 Likes: 3
enthusiast
|
|
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,210 Likes: 3 |
Dunno.
If we stick with Russiagate, I guess you’d have to seperate out those spreading lies and distortions (the malice) from those that would believe em.
With the Iraq invasion, same thing?
The imprisoned and dead in Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Libya, etc.. they’re the German Cleric?
Skull shapes might be simpler.
What do you think?..
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
Yes! The pluperfect subjunctive expresses the same time frame as the pluperfect; that is, it expresses a past action that is more past than another past action. The difference is that the pluperfect subjunctive is used in sentences with a main clause that requires the use of the subjunctive mood in the subordinate clause. I am quite sure that I understood that very well in the distant past, more so than in the recent past, before I came to understand it not at all...
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
Dunno.
If we stick with Russiagate, I guess you’d have to seperate out those spreading lies and distortions (the malice) from those that would believe em.
With the Iraq invasion, same thing?
The imprisoned and dead in Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Libya, etc.. they’re the German Cleric?
Skull shapes might be simpler.
What do you think?.. I think the Theory applies to the willing believers of the lies and not particularly to the malicious Pied Piper purveyors of same. Just think, if people failed to believe the stupid shiit of the stupid shiit shiiters, would that be the end of stupidity?
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373
Member CHB-OG
|
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,430 Likes: 373 |
And the belief that the Democratic Party is ever going to help the working class is stupid So you will be returning that stimmy money that capped at $75K income?
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 12,004 Likes: 133 |
I wonder who believes this woman (and who votes for her)? Surely they can be classed among the stupid? Honorable Representative Boebert
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete.
R. Buckminster Fuller
|
|
|
|
|
