So the 28% pro-death and the 13% pro-life add up to 41% of the population telling the other 59% what's best for them. That's probably a running average on pretty much any issue.

I'm in the 28%, but I'd certainly be able to compromise and at least for now take care of the most at risk. When the religious/political fervor of the post-Trump years dies down, the courts and the doctors will be able make a case for expanding those rights.

The art of the possible, y'know?

States would still have the right to be more or less lenient, and Starbucks was the last corporation to announce that they would cover travel costs for abortions or gender-affirming surgeries.

If John Fetterman survives to run in November, have you seen who his opponent is liable to be? Kathy Barnette is surging in Pennsylvania and could defeat her millionaire rivals.

She is black and she is gritty Pennsylvania to the core. She is radically pro-life and is running on it.

Her mother was raped at eleven and had Kathy when she was twelve.
From Twitter:
Quote
The United States is the greatest nation in the world.

I grew up on a pig farm in a house without insulation, but today I just cast a vote for myself to represent Pennsylvania in the US Senate.

My story is only possible in the USA. To God be the glory!

Last edited by Greger; 05/17/22 04:33 PM.

Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...