Capitol Hill Blue Forums Political Issues Campaign 2020 J6: Putting it all together

Those sound almost identical to the arguments used in 2016 and guess what happened.

Trump got the documents case before a loyal judge, Cannon, and see what happened. She ruled in his favor on everything to the point of obviously disregarding the law. What would you think would happen in a state where the election board was led by a loyal Trump supporter, one who has publicly stated they would overturn elections if they thought fraud was involved. All Trump has to do is say fraud and they will overturn the election.

So simply saying there are all kinds of reasons why Trump couldn't get elected, I say there are all kinds of reason why even if he loses, he can still win. And it gets worse.

Obviously his opponent would not concede based on an overturned election and would immediately file for expedited hearings from the courts. If they get before a Trump loyalist court, they will rule in Trump's favor, and then it is taken to the supremes. You may think and believe the SC will rule by the law but we have already seen what a Trump court thinks about precedents. I think it's a 50-50 proposition whether they will show fealty or rule by the law. Now if they do rule it is illegal to overturn an election, who will enforce the ruling?

You think or believe a Trump loyalist election board would even think any court not ruling in Trumps favor would be a legitimate court? There is no way of legally enforcing a court order. Oh you think the court will order the arrest of the offender. And who will arrest the election board? Trump loyalist sheriffs?

So despite Trump being not qualified to be a dog catcher, and not actually winning the vote, he still has a chance of winning by having rigged the system in his favor. I know ... can't happen in America