|
0 members (),
9
guests, and
1
robot. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,091
Posts313,849
Members6,305
| |
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355
Member CHB-OG
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355 |
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals tells Lindsey Graham to get his scrawny ass down to Atlanta and talk to District Attorney Fani Willis' Grand Jury. Not sure what Miss Lindsey's problem is...he's only a witness. Personally, I think that DA Willis needs to move Graham over to the target column. After all, GA SecState Raffensperger and his deputy Gabriel Sterling have implied that the senator pressured them to disappear Democratic ballots in two phone calls in November after the election. What is she hiding from?
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355
Member CHB-OG
|
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355 |
Just putting this out there in the Ranterverse: GOP members of Congress whose PPP loans were forgiven: Brett Guthrie (KY): $4.3 million Carol Miller (WV): $3.1 million Vern Buchanan (FL): $2.8 million Roger Williams (TX): $1.43 million Kevin Hern (OK): $1.07 million Markwayne Mullin (OK): $988,700 Mark Kelly (PA): $970,100 Matt Gaetz (FL): $476,000 Vicki Hartzler (MO): $451,200 Ralph Norman (SC): $306,520 Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA): $180,000 Greg Pence (IN): $79,441 Ralph Abraham (LA): $38,000 Golly! None of these folks are people of color! What?!? PPP loans were only for whites? You don't say! 
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355
Member CHB-OG
|
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355 |
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals tells Lindsey Graham to get his scrawny ass down to Atlanta and talk to District Attorney Fani Willis' Grand Jury. Not sure what Miss Lindsey's problem is...he's only a witness. Personally, I think that DA Willis needs to move Graham over to the target column. After all, GA SecState Raffensperger and his deputy Gabriel Sterling have implied that the senator pressured them to disappear Democratic ballots in two phone calls in November after the election. What is she hiding from?It turns out that as a witness, Lady G cannot invoke the 5th Amendment - all questions must be answered. Given this, some answers may incriminate Lindsey and he moves to the target column. THIS why the lady doth protest. It all makes sense now. 
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355
Member CHB-OG
|
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355 |
on ABC's This Week..., Jonathan Karl interviewed Nancy Pelosi, asking about Donald Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene. Nancy on Trump: He's not man enough to speak under oath to the J6 committee Nancy on MTG: Ol' what's her name (when asked about Greene's assertion that she will be given more power if House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) replaces her as speaker.) Nancy doesn't give any fcks anymore. 
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355
Member CHB-OG
|
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355 |
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,292 Likes: 16
enthusiast
|
|
enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,292 Likes: 16 |
I don't know why, but I couldn't believe it when I first heard this. It makes me wonder why was it the Honorable Justice Thomas that made this decision? Of all the justices, it was the one that will not recuse himself from anything 2020 election related due to his wives beliefs. They must be testing the waters again. I guess I have been too naïve to think that the Supreme court was above partisanship. BLAH!!
Last edited by Kaine; 10/24/22 07:26 PM.
Good doesn't always win!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,132 Likes: 250
It's the Despair Quotient! Carpal Tunnel
|
|
It's the Despair Quotient! Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17,132 Likes: 250 |
I don't know why, but I couldn't believe it when I first heard this. It makes me wonder why was it the Honorable Justice Thomas that made this decision? Of all the justices, it was the one that will not recuse himself from anything 2020 election related due to his wives beliefs. They must be testing the waters again. I guess I have been too naïve to think that the Supreme court was above partisanship. BLAH!! Uh ohhhh, that sounds like you're getting "hysterical". <<<----sarcasm alert. When they say Chief Justice Roberts has lost control of his court, they're not kidding. Roberts is almost "Weekend at Bernie's" material now. ![[Linked Image from media.tenor.com]](https://media.tenor.com/ZmPpzihPocQAAAAC/hello-hey.gif)
"The Best of the Leon Russell Festivals" DVD
deepfreezefilms.com
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355
Member CHB-OG
|
|
OP
Member CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292 Likes: 355 |
I don't know why, but I couldn't believe it when I first heard this. It makes me wonder why was it the Honorable Justice Thomas that made this decision? Of all the justices, it was the one that will not recuse himself from anything 2020 election related due to his wives beliefs. They must be testing the waters again. I guess I have been too naïve to think that the Supreme court was above partisanship. BLAH!! It’s not just Ginny’s beliefs…it’s her actions. Not only was she in on the planning…she was in contact with Mark Meadows on J6. Then in the Trump documents.access request by the J6 Committee, Clarence was the “1” in the 8-1 decision that Trump sought to injunct the J6 Committee’s request access to Trump documents. In those docs was Ginni Thomas’ emails to the planners of J6. Clearance swears up and down that he and Ginni never discussed J6. Uh…huh. .
Contrarian, extraordinaire
|
|
1 member likes this:
Jeffery J. Haas |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129 Likes: 257
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129 Likes: 257 |
Thomas was the Supreme Court Justice in charge with 11th circuit requests, so the request from Graham should have gone to Thomas. But he should have immediately recused himself and passed it on to another Justice or the whole court (minus himself). He violated a federal statute that says he needs to recuse when his spouse is involved with the issue at hand. Ginny was in the election overturn effort up to her neck. It's known she planned illegal actions with Mark Meadows, Rudy Giuliani, and others, probably including Lindsey Graham. So Clarence Thomas has blatantly violated 28 U.S.C. § 455 Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge. (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
.....(5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
..........(iv) Is to the judge's knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.
Educating anyone benefits everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,292 Likes: 16
enthusiast
|
|
enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,292 Likes: 16 |
Who is it that can enforce such rules upon the Supreme Court?
Good doesn't always win!
|
|
|
|
|
