WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
No Jeff, your probably right. This must be the one military confrontation that your government is telling the truth. This must surely be just as it’s described, all current and past history to the contrary. The walls are closing in on Putin. The Russian economy is crumbling. Victory is just over the hill and there’s no need to worry about all that weaponry flowing in to what’s been recognized as the most corrupt state in Europe. Before March that is.
I One source is General Mark Milley, the other a Ukrainian official. Milley's the one who believed that Ukraine had lost a hundred thousand. Explain how that jives with your assertion that the government is sugar coating the numbers on Ukr losses.
Milley appears to be conflating some truth with some fiction. I believe he’s correct when he mentioned over 100k Ukrainian soldiers are dead. He’s saying a similar amount of Russian soldiers dead. Doubtful but to say less Russian soldiers dying comes close to saying Ukraines losing and, well, we can’t say that as we always back fascist. Not that we’re fascist. Just saying we always back em. There’s a difference right?
The slap down of von der Lyon mentioning the same Ukraine killed number was hilarious though. Watching her Twitter account edit her 100k kia number out of her speech clip was funny.
“ Ursula von der Leyen used the number in a video address, prompting Kyiv's armed forces to state that the death toll was "classified information." Footage of her speech has since been edited to cut the reference.”
Gosh, I wonder what the real number is?… Milleys, von der Lyons revised number or the Ukraine regimes?
Hah! Trick question. The Regime won’t allow publishing numbers. Just like opposition political parties, non aligned press, Russian language, Soviet war memorials or any mention of the Galician massacre, etc, etc…
