WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Round Table for Spring 2024
by jgw - 06/02/24 05:30 PM
2024 Election Forum
by perotista - 06/02/24 01:50 AM
A question
by jgw - 05/31/24 07:06 PM
No rubbers for Trump
by pdx rick - 05/31/24 04:30 PM
Marching in favor of Palestinians
by jgw - 05/26/24 06:45 PM
Yeah, Trump admits he is a pure racist
by pdx rick - 05/14/24 07:28 PM
Trump's base having second thoughts
by pdx rick - 05/14/24 07:25 PM
Watching the Supreme Court
by pdx rick - 05/14/24 07:07 PM
Trump: "Anti-American authoritarian wannabe
by Doug Thompson - 05/05/24 03:27 PM
Fixing/Engineer the Weather
by jgw - 05/03/24 10:52 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 9 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,131,417 my own book page
5,021,748 We shall overcome
4,201,042 Campaign 2016
3,796,592 Trump's Trumpet
3,019,205 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,292
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
jgw 5
Kaine 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,091
Posts313,849
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 77 of 86 1 2 75 76 77 78 79 85 86
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Member
CHB-OG
OP Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
How Demographic Shifts Fueled by Covid Delivered Midterm Wins for Democrats

Quote
...there is evidence that the demographic change spurred by Republicans’ and Democrats’ divergent responses to the pandemic likely cost Republicans a number of key seats in the 2022 midterms. And the fallout, fueled by cross-country migration and even the Covid death toll, could linger into 2024 and beyond.

...

Data from the U.S. Postal Service and Census Bureau shows how the pandemic drove urban professionals who were able to work remotely — disproportionately Democrats — out of coastal, progressive cities to seek more space or recreational amenities in the nation’s suburbs and Sun Belt. This moved liberals out of electoral districts where Democrats reliably won by large margins into many purple regions that had the potential to swing with just small changes to the map.

And because partisan gerrymanderers carved up new districts before the extent of pandemic mobility data was understood, they could not neutralize the population shifts. And pollsters were none the wiser.


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Member
CHB-OG
OP Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
The bottom line is there was not one singular event or action that caused the red wave to fizzle - it was many smaller events and actions which added up to a big rally against Republican candidates and their agenda.


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 55
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 55
I agree with that Rick. The fall in the price of a gallon of gas had a lot to do with it. Trump choosing non-electable candidates like Walker, Diehl, Cox, Oz, Masters, Lake, Laxult and more also had a lot to do with it. Abortion probably persuaded a few independents to vote democratic, only 4% of independents listed abortion as their top tissue. There’s more, but I think you’re right on.

How about instead of calling it a red trickle, we call it a blue trickle. After all the democrats gained a senate seat and 2 governors while limiting their losses in the house to 9 seats. Compare that to the historical averages, which will have to be reworked for a president hovering around 40% overall job approval of 48.5 house seats lost, 6 senate seats and 4.25 governorships. We should start calling this a blue trickle.


It's high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first instead of their political party. For way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Member
CHB-OG
OP Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
...or, we could say that Dems held their ground. smile


Contrarian, extraordinaire


1 member likes this: perotista
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 55
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 55
I said on this site that this was coming. I think the civil war within the GOP began after Nov midterm, but has begun to pick up steam after the Georgia runoff. It’s a battle between avid Trumpers only interested in Trump and getting him nominated again, what I call MAGA statement Republicans. A battle between these Trumpers and more moderate, intelligent Republicans interested in winning elections, not making statements. These latter Republicans know Trump can’t win and if 2022 is a prime example, his chosen candidates can’t either. Almost all went down to defeat.

Republicans fear Trump civil war could cost them in 2024

https://news.yahoo.com/republicans-fear-trump-civil-war-110000936.html

It’s my opinion that the Democrats should just sit back, relax and let all of this play out.


It's high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first instead of their political party. For way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.
1 member likes this: pdx rick
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Member
CHB-OG
OP Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Originally Posted by perotista
It’s my opinion that the Democrats should just sit back, relax and let all of this play out.
Agreed.

We'll know how bad the Republican "civil war" is on January 3, 2023 when the Speaker of the House is voted on. smile


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 55
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 55
Exactly Rick. Trump’s MAGA Republicans are losing power within the GOP. They’re in the minority today at 39% of the GOP. But they’re still the largest faction of many factions within the GOP.

https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/bp8fjk5g14/econTabReport.pdf

Remember, Trump won the GOP primaries and the nomination back in 2016 with 35% of the vote. Yeah, 3 Jan will be most interesting.


It's high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first instead of their political party. For way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129
Likes: 257
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,129
Likes: 257
Quote
And because partisan gerrymanderers carved up new districts before the extent of pandemic mobility data was understood, they could not neutralize the population shifts.

Like I said quite a while back, gerrymandering districts so you have a 5% advantage fails spectacularly when demographics change the voting so you need 6% to win. A lot of those engineered 5% districts go to the other side. Gerrymandering assumes static demographics for 10 years. Not happening here in America now. And they got the triple-whammy of educated professionals working from home in Red states, conservative anti-vaxers and anti-maskers dying, and over a million elderly voters dying from Covid-19.


Educating anyone benefits everyone.
1 member likes this: Jeffery J. Haas
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 55
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 55
Here’s how all Americans view the two major parties and some history. Keep in mind the favorable/unfavorable ratings are dynamic and change constantly.

Party Images Stable After Midterm Elections

https://news.gallup.com/poll/406892...nt=morelink&utm_campaign=syndication

The bottom line, I’ve gone over hundreds of these, you find the bases of both major parties always view their party favorably usually in the mid to upper 90 percentile while the other party views the opposite party in single digits. At least since G.W. Bush’s second term. Independents usually view both major parties around 30% favorable which isn’t surprising. They for the most part don’t like partisan politics. Independents think both major parties should work together to get things done, compromise, play the old game of give and take and not stand on principle. It’s also independents, 75% of them want a viable third party. They’re sick of the two party monopoly as they view both major parties as governing only for their base and not for all of America.


It's high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first instead of their political party. For way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Member
CHB-OG
OP Offline
Member
CHB-OG
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 47,292
Likes: 355
Originally Posted by pondering_it_all
Quote
And because partisan gerrymanderers carved up new districts before the extent of pandemic mobility data was understood, they could not neutralize the population shifts.

Like I said quite a while back, gerrymandering districts so you have a 5% advantage fails spectacularly when demographics change the voting so you need 6% to win. A lot of those engineered 5% districts go to the other side. Gerrymandering assumes static demographics for 10 years. Not happening here in America now. And they got the triple-whammy of educated professionals working from home in Red states, conservative anti-vaxers and anti-maskers dying, and over a million elderly voters dying from Covid-19.
Gerrymandering has obvious political effects, but it can also have economic consequences. One 2018 study found that partisan redistricting impacts people’s ability to borrow money. The less competitive a district was, the less access to credit a person living in that district would have.

Significantly skewed maps in states like Texas, Georgia, Florida and Ohio, which many people thought going in might be greater than the majority that Republicans would have in the House. And that seems to have been borne out. Florida, for example, probably gives Republicans four extra seats than they would have under a fairly drawn map. And so if, in fact, Republicans have a very thin majority in the House, it is likely to be due to gerrymandering.


Contrarian, extraordinaire


Page 77 of 86 1 2 75 76 77 78 79 85 86

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5