Originally Posted by issodhos
Hey. A modest proposal, wot? But seriously, Schlack, words can hurt. Some environgelical Gaians prefer the word "depopulate" in place of "genocide" (much softer sounding, though somewhat clanky), or even better "sustainable population" (has that whole recycling, "giving back" aura to it, don't you think?)

Remember -- it is alright to do something as long as one has "good intentions" or especially if one's "heart was in the right place" and (best of all) if it was meant to alleviate a percieved 'social injustice'!! ;-)
Yours,
Issodhos

the key word here, Iss, is some

but i dont think youve posted a single link to any of them. surely if they were so prevelant....

now what do the majority or even some of the other environmentalists think?

are they interesting in new technologies, process and attitudes in the way we organise energy and food production? perhaps you might update your understanding of what environmentalists and stop listening to the shriekers.




"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
(Philip K.Dick)